We performed a comparison between Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) and SAP Customer Data Cloud based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, HPE Aruba Networking, Forescout and others in Network Access Control (NAC)."The most valuable features are authentication, we have more granular control on the access policies for the administrators. The solution is easy to use, has a center point administration, and has a good GUI."
"We were originally a Cisco shop and Cisco ISE integrated well with our other Cisco switches and networks."
"The most valuable feature is AnyConnect Posture because it scans all the programs on the workstation and checks if the antivirus is up to date, as well as the cryptographic keys on our SSD."
"They have recently made a lot of improvements. My clients don't have much to complain about."
"The most valuable feature is the ASDM - the user interface makes it very easy to configure the firewall."
"Authentication is the most valuable feature because it puts our company at another level of security."
"The most important feature for us is visibility in terms of user connections. It's the ability to see what devices are online for a particular user that helps a lot with our troubleshooting."
"For me, the TACACS feature is the most valuable. I have also used Cisco ISE with LDAP, not with Active Directory. That works for me because I prefer LDAP versus Active Directory."
"SAP CDC is very easy to use and the best part about this tool is its documentation."
"The solution can lag somewhat as we have a large database."
"The initial setup was a little bit complex. It's not that simple because it requires a lot of prerequisites for the solution to get a hold on."
"We face many bugs."
"The interface could be more user-friendly and the ability to apply rules to MAC addresses, for example, if I wanted to allow a certain MAC address access at a particular time I cannot make this adjustment."
"This product doesn't work in isolation."
"The user interface can be improved."
"It should be virtualized because many people have begun migrating to the cloud. They should offer a hybrid version."
"In order to make it a ten, it should be more user-friendly. You need somebody who is knowledgeable about it to use it. It's not easy to use. We have to rely heavily on technical support."
"I have struggled to give different access to different users in the same application."
More Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) is ranked 1st in Network Access Control (NAC) with 135 reviews while SAP Customer Data Cloud is ranked 2nd in Social Login. Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) is rated 8.2, while SAP Customer Data Cloud is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) writes "Gives us that extra ability to assist the end user and make sure that we are making them happy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Customer Data Cloud writes "Enables us to sell products which creates significant revenue but their disaster recovery needs improvement". Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) is most compared with Aruba ClearPass, Fortinet FortiNAC, Forescout Platform, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and Fortinet FortiAuthenticator, whereas SAP Customer Data Cloud is most compared with Auth0, SAP Identity Management, Okta Workforce Identity, ForgeRock and Symantec VIP Access Manager.
We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.