Cisco Intersight vs HPE Eucalyptus comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Cisco Logo
2,318 views|1,880 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Logo
389 views|181 comparisons
50% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cisco Intersight and HPE Eucalyptus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, Nutanix, IBM and others in Cloud Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Our organization uses Cisco Intersight since it helps manage our physical infrastructure.""We enjoy having an inside view of all the data centers and all the EdgeX nodes within a single portal rather than going into the EdgeX connections one by one.""Scalable portfolio of services for remote device management, with good cloud integration. It's also easy to set up.""What I like most about Cisco Intersight is its manageability.""I like Intersight because of the integration with HashiCorp, Kubernetes, and each cloud because Intersight is the IO module.""Cisco Intersight has valuable features for workflow automation and inventory administration.""The tool helps to manage Cisco servers.""Provides an overall view using a single portal."

More Cisco Intersight Pros →

"The most valuable aspect of the solution is the interface on the console."

More HPE Eucalyptus Pros →

Cons
"The unique problem with Cisco Intersight is that it's not supporting some players.""Cisco Intersight needs some improvement in terms of stability. Hybrid cloud management and proper hyperscaler tie-up are other areas for improvement.""The usability must be better.""The solution needs some enhancement in order to build the cluster in two nodes.""The product could be easy to use.""In the future, the solution needs to plan on an extension to cover a broader range of objects since, at present, there are some Cisco devices within the range of Intersight UCS that it can't manage.""When new features are added, the service becomes full of bugs.""The product's setup should be easier."

More Cisco Intersight Cons →

"The customization should be improved."

More HPE Eucalyptus Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Cisco Intersight is not cheap, but it's not the most expensive product either."
  • "It's just the standard licensing cost. There are no additional fees."
  • "Cisco Intersight has competitive pricing. On a scale of one to five, my rating for its pricing is four."
  • "You can get a free license for monitoring but need to purchase a license if you need extra control."
  • "The product is cost-effective."
  • More Cisco Intersight Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.
    767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Intersight can validate our environment.
    Top Answer:We used the solution's automation capabilities, but it wasn’t easy. It was part of why we took some time to deploy the solution. It didn't give us much value. It wasn't that good. Intersight is a… more »
    Top Answer:We use the solution for server management across various locations.
    Top Answer:The best cloud platform for your organization will depend on specific needs and requirements, but below are the advantages and disadvantages of VMware vSphere, Rackspace OpenStack, and HPE Eucalyptus… more »
    Ranking
    13th
    out of 75 in Cloud Management
    Views
    2,318
    Comparisons
    1,880
    Reviews
    7
    Average Words per Review
    468
    Rating
    7.9
    38th
    out of 75 in Cloud Management
    Views
    389
    Comparisons
    181
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Intersight
    Eucalyptus, HP Eucalyptus
    Learn More
    Overview

    Cisco Intersight is Cisco’s systems management platform that delivers intuitive computing through cloud-powered intelligence. This platform offers a more intelligent level of management that enables IT organizations to analyze, simplify, and automate their environments in ways that were not possible with prior generations of tools. This capability empowers organizations to achieve significant savings in Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) and to deliver applications faster, so they can support new business initiates. The advantages of the model-based management of the Cisco UCS platform plus Cisco Intersight are extended to Cisco UCS servers and Cisco HyperFlex and Cisco HyperFlex Edge systems. Cisco HyperFlex Edge is optimized for remote sites, branch offices, and edge environments.

    HP Eucalyptus helps customers grow revenue and stay ahead of competition by enabling developers to get the IT resources they need in seconds, not days. Its unique AWS compatibility ensures applications are easily deployed in private, public or hybrid cloud environments.
    Sample Customers
    EXMAR, RapidScale
    Mosaik Solutions, Nava Solutions
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company43%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    Manufacturing Company5%
    Healthcare Company5%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business30%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise50%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise76%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Cloud Management
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, Nutanix, IBM and others in Cloud Management. Updated: April 2024.
    767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Cisco Intersight is ranked 13th in Cloud Management with 10 reviews while HPE Eucalyptus is ranked 38th in Cloud Management. Cisco Intersight is rated 7.8, while HPE Eucalyptus is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Cisco Intersight writes "Scalable and easy to set up portfolio of services; good for remote device management and other functions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HPE Eucalyptus writes "Good interface, and an easy initial setup with good community support on the free version". Cisco Intersight is most compared with Cisco UCS Manager, HPE OneView, IBM Turbonomic, Cisco UCS Director and VMware Aria Automation, whereas HPE Eucalyptus is most compared with OpenNebula.

    See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

    We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.