Most Helpful Review
Good stability and enables us to identify and isolate a machine that is infected or that is going to be infected
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Using this solution gives us the ability to allow proper access to the network.
The biggest value of ISE is that it can get so granular with gaming systems, versus IoT and BYOD.
Easy to use and provides good support
The best feature of the Cisco ISE platform is that it is compatible with Microsoft products.
We found that the most valuable features associated with this tool are posture assessment, policy management, VLAN assignments, guest assignment, and BYOD services. In addition to these services, the Cisco IOS software switch configuration feature is another very valuable aspect of the policy and compliance solution.
In terms of scalability, you need to factor in your licenses. With a virtual platform, the scalability is more than sufficient. We have over one thousand users.
Visitors can be granted access to the wifi network using their cellphones, notebooks or tablets in a very easy way. The ease of accessibility that anyone can have to the network is very quick and is a big improvement in our network.
For guests we give them limited access to the internet when they come in so that access has been useful. Previously, we just used to give them the APN key which they would leave with. Now, we give them credentials to use that are for a limited period of time.
The short version is that we gained significant insight into the issues of access governance. This allowed us to turn an auditing nightmare into praise from our auditors.
It gives the best user experience, enabling us an overview of all user entitlements.
This solution is better on the IT personnel, because now they spend less (or almost no time) managing user rights.
The most valuable feature for me is the built-in security, which is the best that I have seen.
The connection with multiple systems is what makes it flexible. We can create the accounts flexibly, enabling access to other systems. In addition to Active Directory, it can extend to SAP, to Salesforce, to Office 365, etc.
Nobody has to put people in AD groups by hand anymore. It goes automatically and that's very good. It's also very flexible. It's quite easy to customize and we have customized it a lot.
For me, personally, the automation is the most valuable feature. I don't have to do things manually, like creating user accounts and provisioning them to the target systems.
This is almost a complete solution for us.
There should be a single button that can be pressed to dismiss all of the alarms at once.
I'd like to see an easier way to upgrade to larger versions, as well as more best practices that are easier to locate on their support page.
An area that could be improved is the agent. The challenge now is that agent and most of the computers have changed. They could think about agent-less deployment.
Cisco ISE is complex. The deployment and design of networks with it is so complex. If it could change it would be better.
There are issues with respect to the posture assessment function. It's been observed that customers are not receiving total access to the network because the assessment agent is glitchy and malfunctions from time-to-time. I would like to see refining of the compliance assessment and adding more detailed compliance of endpoints on the user end.
There can be a little bit more integration between the controller management and ISE. There are two dashboards, you have the controller dashboards, and you have the ISE dashboard it would is a way to maybe integrate that into one. That would be great. It's not that bad. It would be easier if it could be combined into one dashboard.
There should be an easier way to do the upgrades. There are a lot of steps to get to the next version from the previous version which ends up being a bit of the headache with the upgrade.
In order to make it a ten, it should be more user-friendly. You need somebody who is knowledgeable about it to use it. It's not easy to use. We have to rely heavily on technical support.
The support team could be improved on. The first level of support essentially looks up knowledge base articles and often can't provide the answer needed.
The initial setup was complex. We have a lot of different systems. The journey from implementing to joining all the systems was difficult.
The performance could use improvement. Sometimes synchronizations take too long.
A feature that I would like to see is a mobile app that provides users the ability to make changes or add users to the Active Directory, on the fly.
More integration with SAP and with the internet of things would be good. We also have system devices that we could manage as identities, so that would be a feature to add.
One of the things we would like is the ability to have more than one system role manager. That would be nice. For example, when people are on vacation, sometimes it gets a little hard to administrate system roles.
The system role manager, or some of the roles that are inside Identity Manager, are limited to one user. It would be more flexible if these responsibility roles could be attached to many people.
It should be able to give a client version of the product, rather than just a web-portal.
Pricing and Cost Advice
If you go directly with Cisco for the implementation it's very, very expensive.
There is a one-time licensing cost, and there is also a yearly subscription fee.
It's costlier that some other products, and there is nothing that fits every solution.
We are using a self-built solution. It would cost too much to get that up to the standard of what we need. In the long-term, it is cheaper to buy a solution that has what we need. Though, we are still running the previous solution, as we are still in the implementation phase.
It needs flexibility in the licensing or packaging, because you buy the entire package at once, and sometimes the customers are a bit overwhelmed with whatever they get. I would like if they could cut the licensing or packaging into somewhat smaller things.
It has helped to reduce customer costs.
We are paying for premium support, which is expensive. However, we do receive very good, fast support.
It helps us save on licenses for applications because we are following the account lifecycle, as well as account reactivation.
We have the premium support and are very satisfied. They are always answer our questions very quickly. For the moment, we are very satisfied, but I think it's because we are paying for the premium support.
out of 24 in Network Access Control
Average Words per Review
out of 62 in Identity Management (IM)
Average Words per Review
Compared 37% of the time.
Compared 19% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Also Known As
|Cisco ISE||Quest One Identity Manager, Dell One Identity Manager|
|Identity Services Engine is a security policy management platform that automates and enforces context-aware security access to network resources. It delivers superior user and device visibility to support enterprise mobility experiences and to control access. It shares data with integrated partner solutions to accelerate their capabilities to identify, mitigate, and remediate threats.|
One Identity Manager helps you mitigate risk, secure data, meet uptime requirements and satisfy compliance by giving your users access to data and applications they need and nothing more. IAM can be driven by business needs, not IT capabilities. With Identity Manager, you can manage user identities, privileges and security across the enterprise, putting you in control of identity management and taking the burden off your IT staff.
Learn more about Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine)
Learn more about One Identity Manager
|Aegean Motorway, BC Hydro, Beachbody, Bucks County Intermediate Unit , Cisco IT, Derby City Council, Global Banking Customer, Gobierno de Castilla-La Mancha, Houston Methodist, Linz AG, London Hydro, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Molina Healthcare, MST Systems, New South Wales Rural Fire Service, Reykjavik University, Wildau University||Texas A&M, Sky Media, BHF Bank, Swiss Post, Union Investment, Wayne State University. More at OneIdentity.com/casestudies|
Comms Service Provider29%
Software R&D Company12%
Software R&D Company26%
Comms Service Provider23%
Financial Services Firm39%
Software R&D Company30%
Comms Service Provider13%
Financial Services Firm8%