We performed a comparison between Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) and OneLogin by One Identity based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, HPE Aruba Networking, Forescout and others in Network Access Control (NAC)."For customers, it's great. It has a GUI, so the customers themselves can edit ACLs or even modify the policies. It's also an all-in-one solution with RADIUS and TACACS."
"One of the most important features is the authentication security for the individual connection to the network through their computer or laptop."
"When you push out the policy, it is able to populate the entire network at one time."
"Using this solution gives us the ability to allow proper access to the network."
"The most valuable feature is the visibility element, the ability for customers to be able to see what devices are actually on their network. Without a solution like ISE, they would have no idea what devices are connected to their network. It offers them the ability to authenticate devices via mobile."
"Cisco ISE now competes with any other product in the space because of its centralized and unified highly secure access control with ISE."
"The most valuable feature of Cisco ISE is its seamless integration with the switches and the entire suite, enabling wireless access and smooth client information retrieval."
"The most important feature for us is visibility in terms of user connections. It's the ability to see what devices are online for a particular user that helps a lot with our troubleshooting."
"OneLogin is efficient."
"It's super useful to have a single pane of glass when it comes to access management."
"One aspect I particularly appreciate is their exceptional customer support whenever I've needed assistance."
"The most valuable feature is the ease with which we can manage the sign-on feature."
"When it comes to access management, the solution's single pane of glass is extremely important. The single pane of glass for access management enables collaborative work between IT and security. We have access to certain applications that require device trust. Based on the role, we can access those applications through OneLogin Desktop."
"Ease of integration with AD."
"The single sign-on and the fact that we can integrate everything in one place and control from there were valuable features of this solution."
"Once I made the OneLogin ID, it would essentially make user names and passwords for every application that we had."
"Cisco ISE's real-time data analytics for database logging could be improved."
"Cisco ISE can become quite complex, especially with policy sets, the entire authentication process, and everything involved."
"The one main thing that it can improve on is the GUI. As the newest addition to the team, I struggle a little bit to get around it just because it has so many features."
"We do tend to run into a lot of issues with ISE when it comes to bugs."
"The solution is not so user-friendly."
"It is too complex. It should be easy to use. We are not such a big team. We only have three engineers to work with this, and we don't use all of the functionality of the product. Its range of functionality is too wide for us, and this is the reason why we are thinking of switching to a more simple product. We have shortlisted a Microsoft solution. We have a big footprint for Microsoft products, especially in security. As a global strategy, we try to leverage to the maximum what is possible around Microsoft."
"The pricing and licensing structure are not ideal for customers."
"The web interface needs improvement. The new web interface that they have is not as easy to manage and we find it to be very slow."
"They have downtime twice a year or once in six months. During the downtime, the SSO page did not come up. When users wanted to get to their email, they were redirected to the OneLogin page, but the page did not come up, and MFA and logins failed. It completely crippled us."
"I would like better reporting from SmartFactor Authentication when a user is not able to sign in due to a new location, new IP, new device, et cetera."
"While I initially used OneLogin's desktop feature to extend SSO, I discontinued it two years ago due to limitations."
"The tool must be made more robust."
"I'd like OneLogin to have a customization section that displays the company's offerings, categorized by different topics."
"More off-hour support."
"OneLogin offers a Virtual LDAP feature that we utilize, although it differs slightly from traditional LDAP servers."
"The solution keeps going down for many hours, which impacts the entire company. You can't access any applications. OneLogin Desktop has a huge problem where it locks your computers and you need to reset the whole computer, which is pretty insane."
More Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) is ranked 1st in Network Access Control (NAC) with 135 reviews while OneLogin by One Identity is ranked 8th in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) with 16 reviews. Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) is rated 8.2, while OneLogin by One Identity is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) writes "Gives us that extra ability to assist the end user and make sure that we are making them happy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OneLogin by One Identity writes "Integrated well and had a single pane of glass, but downtime and pricing were issues for us". Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) is most compared with Aruba ClearPass, Fortinet FortiNAC, Forescout Platform, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and Fortinet FortiAuthenticator, whereas OneLogin by One Identity is most compared with Auth0, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identity, LastPass and F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM).
We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.