Compare Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) vs. Ruckus Cloudpath

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, ForeScout, Aruba Networks and others in Network Access Control. Updated: May 2021.
479,894 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The best feature of the Cisco ISE platform is that it is compatible with Microsoft products.""Easy to use and provides good support""The biggest value of ISE is that it can get so granular with gaming systems, versus IoT and BYOD.""Using this solution gives us the ability to allow proper access to the network.""The features that do work, work well, and we use it on a daily basis.""The feature that I most like is that it can notify me whenever someone plugs in their device, which is not allowed. I get notifications for new laptop devices. I think the user interface looks good compared to previous versions.""The solution cuts down on the repercussions of getting malware or ransomware.""The implementation is very simple."

More Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) Pros »

"I find the solution to be very rich in features."

More Ruckus Cloudpath Pros »

Cons
"Cisco ISE is complex. The deployment and design of networks with it is so complex. If it could change it would be better.""An area that could be improved is the agent. The challenge now is that agent and most of the computers have changed. They could think about agent-less deployment.""I'd like to see an easier way to upgrade to larger versions, as well as more best practices that are easier to locate on their support page.""There should be a single button that can be pressed to dismiss all of the alarms at once.""The interface is not very user-friendly and it is not simple to use.""The software is a little bit complicated to understand in the beginning, meaning the implementation. It needs proper documentation so that we can understand the options more easily.""The solution can lag somewhat as we have a large database.""The web interface needs improvement. The new web interface that they have is not as easy to manage and we find it to be very slow."

More Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) Cons »

"I believe the solution is missing some great features which are present in other solutions like Aruba, UiPath, and Cisco ISE."

More Ruckus Cloudpath Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The SMARTnet technical support is available at an additional cost.""For the Avast virus scan, we pay around USD $95 per machine for five years which includes all updates and technical support.""The price for Cisco ISE is high.""The price can be lower, especially for subscriptions. It should be a lot cheaper to have a wide range of customers. The price should be comparable to competitive products like Forescout or Fortinet FortiNAC. Forescout is cheaper for customers looking for a cloud solution.""There are other cheaper options available.""The price is okay.""I think licensing costs roughly $2,000 a year. ISE is more expensive than Network Access Control.""I think the price is okay."

More Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The licensing of the solution is user-based and the price is good."

More Ruckus Cloudpath Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Access Control solutions are best for your needs.
479,894 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The way we can trust this solution is the most valuable. We have no issue with this product. It is a competitive product. You need to have a very good and deep knowledge of the product to take the… more »
Top Answer: Its price is probably good if you use all of its features and functionalities to protect your environment. If you use only a part of the functionality, its price is too high. It is just a question of… more »
Top Answer: It is too complex. It should be easy to use. We are not such a big team. We only have three engineers to work with this, and we don't use all of the functionality of the product. Its range of… more »
Top Answer: I find the solution to be very rich in features.
Top Answer: The licensing of the solution is user-based and the price is good.
Top Answer: I believe the solution is missing some great features which are present in other solutions like Aruba, UiPath, and Cisco ISE. One example of an improvement could be regarding mobile device… more »
Ranking
1st
Views
31,235
Comparisons
21,825
Reviews
17
Average Words per Review
580
Rating
7.8
10th
Views
541
Comparisons
417
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
455
Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Cisco ISE
Learn More
Overview
Identity Services Engine is a security policy management platform that automates and enforces context-aware security access to network resources. It delivers superior user and device visibility to support enterprise mobility experiences and to control access. It shares data with integrated partner solutions to accelerate their capabilities to identify, mitigate, and remediate threats.

Cloudpath Enrollment System is a software/SaaS platform that delivers secure wired and wireless network access for BYOD, guest users and IT-owned devices. It streamlines getting devices on the network and secures every connection with powerful encryption. Cloudpath software gives you granular policy control over what network resources users can access. It lets you deliver a great end-user experience and virtually eliminates helpdesk tickets related to network access. Choose from cloud-based or virtualized on-premises deployment. Cloudpath software supports any user, any device, and any network infrastructure.

Offer
Learn more about Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine)
Learn more about Ruckus Cloudpath
Sample Customers
Aegean Motorway, BC Hydro, Beachbody, Bucks County Intermediate Unit , Cisco IT, Derby City Council, Global Banking Customer, Gobierno de Castilla-La Mancha, Houston Methodist, Linz AG, London Hydro, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Molina Healthcare, MST Systems, New South Wales Rural Fire Service, Reykjavik University, Wildau University
Information Not Available
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Comms Service Provider19%
Computer Software Company19%
Government11%
Financial Services Firm11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider33%
Computer Software Company20%
Government8%
Financial Services Firm4%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider42%
Government13%
Computer Software Company11%
Educational Organization8%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business30%
Midsize Enterprise23%
Large Enterprise46%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business12%
Midsize Enterprise17%
Large Enterprise71%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, ForeScout, Aruba Networks and others in Network Access Control. Updated: May 2021.
479,894 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) is ranked 1st in Network Access Control with 20 reviews while Ruckus Cloudpath is ranked 10th in Network Access Control with 1 review. Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) is rated 7.8, while Ruckus Cloudpath is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) writes "Streamlines security policy management and reduces operating costs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ruckus Cloudpath writes "Well-featured, price competitive, and great technical support". Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) is most compared with Aruba ClearPass, Forescout Platform, Fortinet FortiNAC, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator and CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, whereas Ruckus Cloudpath is most compared with Aruba ClearPass, Sophos Network Access Control, Fortinet FortiNAC, Pulse Policy Secure and Forescout Platform.

See our list of best Network Access Control vendors.

We monitor all Network Access Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.