• Home
  • Cisco MDS 9500 Series [EOL] vs. IBM SAN384B

Cisco MDS 9500 Series [EOL] vs IBM SAN384B comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
Unranked
In Enterprise SAN
5th
out of 15 in Enterprise SAN
Views
234
Comparisons
191
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
MDS 9500 Series
SAN384B
Learn More
Cisco
Video Not Available
IBM
Overview
Information Not Available
The IBM System Storage SAN384B fabric backbone is a core and edge network switching platform designed for midrange to enterprise-level Storage Area Network (SAN) applications. It features multiprotocol architecture, high performance, and scalable design:
  • 8 Gbps industry-standard Fibre Channel (FC) switch capability for systems that support 8 Gbps throughput
  • Auto sensing FC ports supporting 1 Gbps, 2 Gbps, 4 Gbps, and 8 Gbps
  • Up to 384, 8 Gbps user ports connected in a dual core with the use of Inter-Chassis Links (ICLs), and up to 192 ports in a single domain
  • High-performance port and switching blades
Sample Customers
Republic Bank & Trust Company
Tabicel, Sanmarco Informatica, National Institutes of Health, Chapman University, Baldor Electric, University of New Brunswick, Harim Group Corp.

Cisco MDS 9500 Series [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Enterprise SAN while IBM SAN384B is ranked 5th in Enterprise SAN. Cisco MDS 9500 Series [EOL] is rated 0.0, while IBM SAN384B is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Cisco MDS 9500 Series [EOL] is most compared with , whereas IBM SAN384B is most compared with IBM SAN48B-5 and Cisco MDS Series.

See our list of best Enterprise SAN vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise SAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.