Cisco MDS Series vs Oracle FS1 Flash Storage System comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Cisco Logo
1,033 views|709 comparisons
77% willing to recommend
Oracle Logo
28 views|23 comparisons
50% willing to recommend
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"SAN switches in Cisco MDS Series are a valuable feature of the solution for our company.""The most valuable feature of the Cisco MDS Series is its reliability, support, and scalability.""The most valuable features of this solution are the devices, databases, and zoning.""The features I found most valuable are the ease of deployment, it's easy to upgrade, easy to configure and easy to administer. There is no need for vendor professional services which saves project cost. The usage of WebUI for all primary features like hostname, IP address, SNMP traps, zone sets, addition and deletion of zone members or zone sets, backup of switch DB is very simple.""The issues with these switches are extremely rare, and the whole product line is very predictable and stable.""The most valuable feature of the Cisco MDS Series is security.""The product is easy to use."

More Cisco MDS Series Pros →

"It's actually shaking hands with the workflow solutions much better than any other storage."

More Oracle FS1 Flash Storage System Pros →

Cons
"Cisco MDS Series can improve by having API functionality for automation and programming.""It is quite a stable product. It should be shipped with the latest firmware to avoid download and upload schema at the beginning of the initial setup. There should also be the possibility of downgrading the firmware when required. WebUI needs DCNM instead a web-based GUI should be made available like Brocade san switch.""Cisco MDS Series could improve by adding more gigahertz. However, they are doing this over time.""The product is very expensive.""The solution's management interface and GUI need improvement.""The GUI client is Java-based and we know that Java is not secure, so everyone disables it.""The licensing model could be less complicated."

More Cisco MDS Series Cons →

"It has to be flexible according to the customer's requirements. It has to be aligned with the customer business and the business environment."

More Oracle FS1 Flash Storage System Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It's perpetual licensing and maintenance is a recurrent cost."
  • "The price of the Cisco MDS Series is high."
  • "Pricing cannot be considered an advantageous trait of the solution since it is expensive. I rate the solution's pricing a three out of ten."
  • More Cisco MDS Series Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise SAN solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ranking
    1st
    out of 15 in Enterprise SAN
    Views
    1,033
    Comparisons
    709
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    340
    Rating
    8.8
    10th
    out of 15 in Enterprise SAN
    Views
    28
    Comparisons
    23
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Cisco MDS 9100, Cisco MDS 9222i, Cisco MDS 9700
    Learn More
    Overview

    Cisco MDS 9000 Series Switches have met and often exceeded the demanding requirements for storage area networks for more than a decade. They offer a combination of performance, non-stop operations, and multiprotocol flexibility.

    The Oracle FS1-2 flash storage system, Oracle’s premier preferred SAN storage solution, delivers enterprise-grade storage capabilities that are optimized for flash media and coengineered with Oracle software. Using the Quality of Service Plus (QoS Plus) feature, the Oracle FS1-2 flash storage system places data across flash and disk storage to maximize performance, efficiency, and cost based on usage profiles and business priorities. The Oracle FS1-2 flash storage system takes application-engineered storage to a new level by providing out-of-the-box tuned storage provisioning profiles for Oracle Database and key applications, including Microsoft SharePoint and Exchange, and VMware support including VAAI. With the Oracle FS1-2 flash storage system, you can consolidate storage while achieving predictable performance for multiple diverse workloads in enterprise computing or multitenant environments.

    Sample Customers
    National Rugby League
    Enterprise Strategy Group, Groupe AGRICA, Keolis, Dragon Slayer Consultant
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company24%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Government10%
    Healthcare Company8%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business50%
    Large Enterprise50%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business28%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise63%
    No Data Available

    Cisco MDS Series is ranked 1st in Enterprise SAN with 8 reviews while Oracle FS1 Flash Storage System is ranked 10th in Enterprise SAN. Cisco MDS Series is rated 9.0, while Oracle FS1 Flash Storage System is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Cisco MDS Series writes "Simple deployment, reliable, and scales well". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle FS1 Flash Storage System writes "Has a fantastic feature-set and works well with workflow solutions". Cisco MDS Series is most compared with Dell Connectrix, HPE SN6000, IBM SAN384B, Pure Storage FlashArray and Dell PowerVault, whereas Oracle FS1 Flash Storage System is most compared with Dell Unity XT.

    See our list of best Enterprise SAN vendors.

    We monitor all Enterprise SAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.