Cisco Meeting Server vs Vidyo comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Cisco Logo
950 views|743 comparisons
Vidyo Logo
96 views|47 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cisco Meeting Server and Vidyo based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Zoom Video Communications, Cisco, TeamViewer and others in Virtual Meetings.
To learn more, read our detailed Virtual Meetings Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Licensing fees are billed yearly."
  • "Cisco Meeting Server has reasonable licensing costs."
  • "Price-wise, Cisco Meeting Server is a product that falls in a mid-range category."
  • More Cisco Meeting Server Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Virtual Meetings solutions are best for your needs.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Cisco Meeting Server is an easy and less complex solution.
    Top Answer:Price-wise, Cisco Meeting Server is a product that falls in a mid-range category.
    Top Answer:Cisco Meeting Server should include a feature to control another user's screen during a remote session.
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    10th
    out of 62 in Virtual Meetings
    Views
    950
    Comparisons
    743
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    388
    Rating
    9.0
    38th
    out of 62 in Virtual Meetings
    Views
    96
    Comparisons
    47
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Acano
    VidyoConferencing
    Learn More
    Overview

    Cisco Meeting Server brings premises-based video, audio, and web communication together to meet the collaboration needs of the modern workplace. It works with third-party devices, and provides an enjoyable and intuitive user experience. It also scales easily, and can be purchased using our all-in-one, user-based multiparty licensing offer.

    Delivers higher-quality experiences and greater deployment flexibility - all at a lower cost - over converged IP networks.
    Sample Customers
    Starz
    Mercy, Ricoh, Rubbermaid, Philips, Hitachi Inspire, Vedder Price, Carnegie Mellon University, 2Internet, Arizona State University, Ontario Telemedicine Network, GAP
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company23%
    Government12%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise63%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Virtual Meetings
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Zoom Video Communications, Cisco, TeamViewer and others in Virtual Meetings. Updated: March 2024.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Cisco Meeting Server is ranked 10th in Virtual Meetings with 5 reviews while Vidyo is ranked 38th in Virtual Meetings. Cisco Meeting Server is rated 8.4, while Vidyo is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Cisco Meeting Server writes "A scalable tool useful to hold conferences and video meetings". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Vidyo writes "Affordable Video conferencing - both for deployment as well as telecommunication requirements. Has room to improve". Cisco Meeting Server is most compared with Webex, Pexip, Zoom, Skype for Business and Cisco TelePresence, whereas Vidyo is most compared with .

    See our list of best Virtual Meetings vendors.

    We monitor all Virtual Meetings reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.