We performed a comparison between Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) and ManageEngine Mobile Device Manager Plus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, JAMF, VMware and others in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM)."Great for software update needs, operating system version updates, and security policy enforcement."
"It's easy to manage."
"Among the most valuable features are the Company Portal that is built into Intune, and the update rings so that we can manage what types of future updates the devices get."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Intune is having all our devices compliant with our policies."
"Configuration profiles, remediation, scripts, and auto-pilot features are very good."
"The central administration con dashboard is very easy to use and provides very good oversight on all that needs to be monitored."
"Conditional access has helped us tailor and enforce our security policies in the mobile space."
"Intune provides full visibility into all active mobile device users. If their devices are noncompliant with our security policies, I have the flexibility to update them remotely."
"The UI is easy to learn."
"Meraki Systems Manager's most valuable features are password management, device tracking, remote resetting and wiping, device management, inventory management, and easy policy deployment."
"The most significant benefit is that the deployment is quick and painless. You don't need a specialized IT department to implement and scale the network. It's easy to maintain, too. It only requires one or two network administrators."
"I have found the location analytics feature that is built into the APs to be the most valuable. It allows you to compare data and to single out individuals who are repeatedly coming into your store. We can observe different trends. This is what separates it from a lot of the other solutions."
"The product provides a universal dashboard."
"It's very easy to just keep adding devices as needed."
"The central management console on the cloud is fast and is the solution's most valuable feature."
"We experience no downtime, no breakdowns, all the user readings are exact, and it gives us quick analysis so we can apply security measures."
"Can manage a large fleet of devices without any outside interference."
"Its configuration is fairly complicated. You have to do quite a bit of discovery to be able to deploy it for a customer. You have to ask them a lot of questions. So, its initial deployment is the biggest challenge. They should make it easier to deploy with the use of Wizards or something else. During the deployment stage, there could be profiles for the customers who are particularly wanting to use certain feature sets of Intune."
"Reporting and troubleshooting for the application deployment could be better. It's very difficult to understand."
"Having a dedicated configuration server that assists in modifying the configuration service, and creating personalized structures, interfaces, and web services could enhance usability."
"Microsoft Intune's support for Mac devices is lacking and could be improved."
"The configuration could be better by consolidating options and making it simpler."
"There's quite a lot of development that they can do within their Intune dashboard. I think there are too many lines hyperlinked to move you around. Others, in contrast, give you a simple dashboard and an intuitive administrative walkthrough."
"Microsoft Intune fails a lot when it comes to device compliance."
"I would like to see micro VPN. I like the way that some of the other providers have done something similar where, as you open that app on an end-point device, it creates a micro VPN straight into your device, which is quite a nice little feature. Also, Microsoft Intune relies heavily on its fellow products in the suite. It would be nice if Microsoft Intune could stand on its own two feet."
"Security could be improved, and there could be more features that enable you to customize the end customer solution."
"I would rate my experience with the initial setup a four out of ten, where one is difficult, and ten is easy. It is more difficult."
"Because Cisco has improved a lot and is competing with other technologies that are innovative and brand new to the market, the only improvements they have to make are to keep up with the current competition and remain competitive with other solutions."
"Meraki is limiting our connections."
"They need to allocate more energy in terms of their offering to devices that are not Apple devices."
"System's compatibility with Google Chrome could be improved."
"One area for improvement in Cisco Meraki Systems Manager is the ability for more advanced users to make detailed and non-standard changes."
"The solution can be expensive."
"Lacks a factory reset feature."
More Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) is ranked 6th in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 26 reviews while ManageEngine Mobile Device Manager Plus is ranked 11th in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 1 review. Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) is rated 8.4, while ManageEngine Mobile Device Manager Plus is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) writes "Easy to use and excels in generating reports". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ManageEngine Mobile Device Manager Plus writes "Great features with very good function management". Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) is most compared with VMware Workspace ONE, Jamf Pro, IBM MaaS360, ManageEngine Endpoint Central and SOTI MobiControl, whereas ManageEngine Mobile Device Manager Plus is most compared with ManageEngine Endpoint Central, IBM MaaS360, Google Endpoint Management, VMware Workspace ONE and SOTI MobiControl.
See our list of best Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.