TonyMoorePresident at www.virtualtechsolutionsusa.com
Bjarne MattilaSophos Engineer at TELE IT A/S
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"The stability of the solution is very good. It's reliable. We don't have crashes or experience freezing. There aren't bugs or glitches."
"I have found the location analytics feature that is built into the APs to be the most valuable. It allows you to compare data and to single out individuals who are repeatedly coming into your store. We can observe different trends. This is what separates it from a lot of the other solutions."
"The management and enrollment process is great, and with the asset management and instant action menu, we can easily maintain and support the users."
"In terms of valuable features, we liked the lock feature, the roll-out white feature, and the find feature. I think that Sophos had a GPS locator, so you could figure out where the phone was from a GPS location."
"They always add more features to this product."
"We've really only experimented with their iOS client. This is due to the fact that their Windows client has a lot to be desired. We first tried experimenting with the Windows one but very quickly determined that it wasn't going to cut it for most Windows cases. The Windows portion of this product needs improvement. I'd say that it's not really viable."
"The cost of installing this solution can be more expensive depending on who is doing the installation. Cisco is very expensive, and I'd like to see a reduction in cost."
"We would like to see graphics showing the use of each device."
"In terms of what could be improved, the initial configuration and setup of the environment could probably be made a little bit easier. There are so many pieces that go into it. Intune is absolutely insane and Sophos is better, but it still is a bit complex to get it all set up correctly."
"It could be more secure."
"The cost of installing this solution can be more expensive depending on who is doing the installation. Cisco is very expensive."
"The licensing is paid on a yearly basis."
Every user is unique. Every device, a bit different. Systems Manager keeps the network in the loop about constantly changing devices, automatically tracking device posture and adjusting security policies to match.
Sophos Mobile is a Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) and security solution that helps businesses spend less time and effort to manage and secure traditional and mobile endpoints. The only UEM solution that integrates natively with a leading next-gen endpoint security platform, Sophos Mobile supports management of Windows 10, macOS, iOS, and Android devices.
Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) is ranked 10th in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 2 reviews while Sophos Mobile is ranked 13th in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 3 reviews. Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) is rated 8.6, while Sophos Mobile is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) writes "A stable and scalable solution that allows you to pre-configure the devices before you get them into the company". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sophos Mobile writes "AI-Synchronized Security, Central administration, Asset management, Remote Support, saves valuable time and resources for other projects ". Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) is most compared with Microsoft Intune, Jamf Pro, VMware Workspace ONE, ManageEngine Desktop Central and BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite, whereas Sophos Mobile is most compared with Microsoft Intune, VMware Workspace ONE, Lookout, Jamf Pro and Trend Micro Mobile Security. See our Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) vs. Sophos Mobile report.
See our list of best Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.