We performed a comparison between Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) and Citrix Endpoint Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is the policy CSPs."
"The most valuable feature is the UEM capabilities."
"It has helped with compliance. It has helped to ensure that devices comply with the organization's policy. If they are not compliant and secure, they cannot access the resources."
"Agile and easy to deploy MDM solution that covers the maximum number of policies. Stable, scalable, and with knowledgeable technical support."
"The policy and compliance monitoring of devices and the software deployment are most valuable."
"Fortunately, now everything is streamlined into a single, unified platform."
"Stable solution at a good price."
"This product works very well for companies already using the full Microsoft suite."
"The solution is simple."
"The most valuable features of Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) are its ability to do geofencing for devices, manage thousands of devices with only a push of a button, and quick application deployment in seconds. It's amazing. For example, in an education scenario, you can deploy an application update for thousands of iPads in two clicks."
"We use this solution for MDM."
"It has facilitated zero-touch authorization events for our employees and their devices. Furthermore, Meraki Systems Manager plays a vital role in securing our notebooks."
"The stability of the solution is very good. It's reliable. We don't have crashes or experience freezing. There aren't bugs or glitches."
"It’s helped us manage our endpoints."
"The cloud dashboard's analytics data is particularly valuable, giving me insights into user activities and making it easy to track and manage devices."
"The central management console on the cloud is fast and is the solution's most valuable feature."
"We have seen improvements in compliance management on the devices."
"A valuable feature of Citrix Endpoint Management is that it's stable. The stability is not a challenge among the move to the cloud."
"The MAM applications of the product are great."
"ShareFile, in particular, is valuable with its ease of sharing, and the best category security that is in the hands of users."
"The product is capable of acting in many different ways to help secure architecture."
"It would help if administrators could pinpoint the exact location of a stolen device to help law enforcement retrieve it and apprehend the suspect."
"Lacks the ability to deploy more ways of management, managing devices and processing the policies."
"I think there should be a better tracking of the cell phones used on the Intune."
"Deploying an app can be a complex process due to dependencies."
"The add-ons must be integrated into the solution."
"The solution could be improved by the opportunity to connect third-party application databases, such as Chocolatey or another setup store, to Intune."
"In terms of what can be improved, I am looking for better enhancements regarding Apple management, not only on the mobile device, but also on the laptop."
"There are some issues using the solution with macOS and iOS, and it offers limited granular control with them. Intune works better on Windows and Android."
"The tool's pricing needs to be more flexible like Cisco's."
"In my opinion, the equipment availabilities and competitive pricings could be improved."
"The cost of installing this solution can be more expensive depending on who is doing the installation. Cisco is very expensive, and I'd like to see a reduction in cost."
"There are problems with the connection on the client side, and the app that was deployed could be better."
"The solution can be expensive."
"Because Cisco has improved a lot and is competing with other technologies that are innovative and brand new to the market, the only improvements they have to make are to keep up with the current competition and remain competitive with other solutions."
"It would be beneficial to have better integration with other OS."
"Security could be improved, and there could be more features that enable you to customize the end customer solution."
"Citrix needs to improve the architecture. They also need to strengthen the application integration. They keep referring to some things to be required as security, and they keep selling the next level and on-premise separately. They should give the customer the opportunity to decide whether they want to use the next level on-premise or on-cloud, but they should not charge additional fees if the customer wants to deploy the next level on-premise because the customer is already being charged as the end user. They should allow next level on-premise optimization without any additional charges."
"Requires integrating with ABM before enabling some of the features."
"Support for inventory management of Apple devices should be added."
"The tool’s battery usage was high."
More Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) is ranked 6th in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 25 reviews while Citrix Endpoint Management is ranked 7th in UEM (Unified Endpoint Management) with 9 reviews. Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) is rated 8.4, while Citrix Endpoint Management is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) writes "Easy to use and excels in generating reports". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Citrix Endpoint Management writes "Great application deployment, gateway and split tunnel features". Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) is most compared with VMware Workspace ONE, Jamf Pro, IBM MaaS360 and SOTI MobiControl, whereas Citrix Endpoint Management is most compared with VMware Workspace ONE, MOBI, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, CyberArk Identity and Ivanti Endpoint Manager. See our Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) vs. Citrix Endpoint Management report.
We monitor all Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.