Anonymous UserNetwork and Security Consultant at a insurance company
Piyush-PatelSenior Technical Support Executive
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"The most valuable feature of Aruba Wireless is application monitoring."
"I like the way it groups and manages access points."
"The technical support is very good."
"It is easy to install and deploy."
"The most valuable feature is the fact that it can work with many devices. It supports everything that we need it to."
"Aruba Wireless is easily scaled between a lot of devices and a lot of endpoints. When we decided to use it as our solution, we had planned to use it exactly for its ability to scale."
"The technical support is 24/7 from the UA."
"The fact that Aruba Wireless has a virtual controller onboard the internet access points makes it cheaper than other solutions."
"The management and upgrades are very simple and straightforward."
"The solution is very stable. It is a very manageable and secure system."
"Multiple access ID capabilities, meshing, and the quality of the product itself are all valuable features."
"The flexibility, since it's a cloud service, is the most valuable feature of this solution."
"The functionalities are quite professional and complete. It offers good integration with other Meraki products, like switches and the firewall. You can get an overview of all networks and the host. It's really great; nobody else can do that."
"The most valuable features are the management tools, including monitoring and reporting."
"We can deploy it and check in on our customers without having an on-site connection or an on-site infrastructure for elderly customers."
"The solution is easily scalable. There are not really any limits for the customer in terms of expanding if they need to."
"The firewall integration is very important for the security of the connection."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to connect and broadcast to different networks without using a VLAN or a layer two switch, which allows you to easily create guest networks."
"This is the only product on the market currently that supports as many access points for wifi users."
"The product is a stable solution."
"I found that It's really good when comparing it to any other product or it is much better in terms of features that the customer requires."
"For a more senior tool, a local application monitoring related to IoT vendors would be useful."
"A lot of the access point commands are in the command line interface, versus being in the GUI."
"There is a lot of information for users about the product, but it needs to be better organized so that solutions are easier to find."
"The upgrades tend to be buggy and better testing is needed before they are released."
"The urgent areas of improvement would be customer support, better tuned default settings, and documentation."
"Better integration between the controller and the ClearPass portal would be a nice change."
"Improvements to the GUI, such as being able to search in the Mobility Master, would be nice."
"Aruba needs to be more competitive with newer products. Their legacy makes that more difficult for them."
"Technical support can be improved, as well as having more detailed capabilities to go without using an API."
"In a future release, they should offer a next-generation UTM, where you can manage all items and the network, and have it include a lot of security features like fingerprinting functionality."
"Unfortunately, we have to deal with European privacy laws and as far as we can see, the solution is not compliant with these. It's why we're not able to continue with Cisco Meraki. They need to become compliant with GDPR laws."
"There is only one particular thing that needs improvement. Sometimes, for example, when you need to open a ticket, although it's under the umbrella of Cisco, you still need to go to the Meraki support."
"The commercial version of the solution could be cheaper."
"In the future, I would like to see IP telephony in Saudi Arabia."
"The technical support for Meraki needs improvements made to the waiting times."
"Meraki should share their viability roadmap. It is really hard to know which functionality will appear or when they will be available. It is also hard to know which features are available now but are not visible on the dashboard."
"This solution should be easier to set up in a production environment."
"The guest management features need to be improved by adding automation."
"The pricing model can be improved to encourage use by small business and individuals and the hardware could stand to be redesigned."
"Technical support is very poor. We are not satisfied with the technical support because there is not any direct person from Fortinet for any troubleshooting, which we expected."
"Documentation could be improved."
"If you compare it to other solutions then it's reasonably priced."
"Get multiple bids/quotes, and talk to the representatives about the limitations of the product; pretty standard."
"I think they should lower their prices."
"Aruba is comparable to competing solutions when it comes to price."
"The support pricing for Juniper Mist is higher than Aruba."
"The price of Aruba Wireless should be cheaper."
"Aruba is probably cheaper than Cisco, and yet you get all the things that you want."
"The access points are more cost-effective over some other providers, both in cost per AP and the option of a controller-less environment."
"It's a pretty good value, but not great. Pricing is on a yearly basis for the Meraki solution."
"The price is good, but it could be improved."
"You have to renew your contract every year, or for three or for five years. If you do not pay right away they will suspend your subscription."
"The pricing is based on a subscription and is a bit high at the moment."
"This solution is quite costly and there are costs in addition to the licensing fees."
"This solution is slightly more expensive than others, such as Ruckus Wi-Fi."
"It's not super expensive and it's not super cheap."
"The cost is not so much for Wireless LAN, but when you have to get the security license, it costs a lot."
"For indoor access points, there is a one-time cost, upfront, whereas outdoor access points have an annual fee."
"Fortinet would do something with their pricing model to attract smaller business users and eliminate the mandatory service contracts."
Consolidate security and wireless LAN management with our integrated wireless solutions. Single-pane-of-glass management for security and access without the need to add point products simplifies deployment and reduces management complexity. These solutions are highly scalable to support even the largest organizations and distributed enterprises.
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is ranked 3rd in Wireless LAN with 40 reviews while Fortinet FortiWLM is ranked 8th in Wireless LAN with 5 reviews. Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is rated 8.4, while Fortinet FortiWLM is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN writes "Knowledgeable and helpful support, and it scales and load-balances to fit our needs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fortinet FortiWLM writes "Solves access point issues and reduces the need for excessive wifi transmission ". Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is most compared with Ubiquiti Wireless, Cisco Wireless, Ruckus Wireless, Mist Access Points and Aruba Instant, whereas Fortinet FortiWLM is most compared with Cisco Wireless, Ruckus Wireless, Ubiquiti Wireless, Ubiquiti WLAN and ExtremeCloud IQ. See our Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Fortinet FortiWLM report.
See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.