Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Ruckus Wireless

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is ranked 5th in Wireless LAN with 4 reviews vs Ruckus Wireless which is ranked 4th in Wireless LAN with 10 reviews. The top reviewer of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN writes "Allows me to integrate another system very quickly, as we continue expanding for our client". The top reviewer of Ruckus Wireless writes "Allows us to deploy systems and not deal as much with support, because it just works". Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Ubiquiti Wireless and Aerohive Networks. Ruckus Wireless is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Aerohive Networks and Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN. See our Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Ruckus Wireless report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
+Add products to compare
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Ruckus Wireless and others in Wireless LAN.
287,901 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Ruckus Wireless

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
This product has allowed us to easily create custom SSIDs for clients and carve out the necessary bandwidth for clients needs.I really love their cloud-based dashboard which allows me to see all my locations from one location.It will allow me to integrate another system very quickly, as we continue expanding for our client.It has good security with its Layer 7 protections.The dashboard to keep track of 30 or so APs, switches, routers and logs, is invaluable. I liked the UX on this.

Read more »

Valuable features include Bonjour Gateway and the hardware antenna array.Dead zones were immediately eliminated when we deployed these WAPs in all of our locations, plus Ruckus’ analytics on the ZoneDirectors allow us to quickly identify clients that are taking too much bandwidth.We are able to quickly identify Rogue WAPs in our network and move to disconnect them immediately when Ruckus alerts us.Ruckus WAPs have excellent coverage and their beamforming means that we can cover more area with fewer WAPs.At times of heavy network congestion, we can restrict the bandwidth available to clients either by SSID or at the client level, which helps cut down on our bandwidth costs.Because of ​Zero-IT, it is easier to get people connected to the correct SSID without providing a passphrase​.There is better security on our internal SSID/VLAN due to the use of Zero-IT​.The list of options you have is great: throttling guest networks, the controller dashboards for administration, on-the-fly configuring, settings, hours of use.

Read more »

Cons
I would like to see them improve their support where an assigned engineer can take the case all the way to closure. Usually, you get a different engineer calling regarding the same ticket.The error logs need to be much more comprehensive.

Read more »

Sometimes doing mass changes on their products can be challenging.​The interface should be mobile friendly.​I think that Web management, global management, could be improved. Unfortunately, there's not one solution that does everything. There are something like six different solutions, and each of them do something better than the others. Unfortunately, there's not one global solution that does everything.Mounting options for outdoor access points, I think they could easily improve on that.The cloud controller needs work. My big issue is that all APs can't set static IPs. Also, adding customers to your dashboard is not that easy at all. I wish I could pop out some reporting from the dashboards as well.While the Virtual SmartZone appliance has improved in the last few years, it isn’t without issue and the performance of the Web page leaves something to be desired.Ruckus seems to have removed the built-in help from the appliance, urging the user to log on to the support web site to obtain it. This is simply a nuisance if one wishes to look up what a particular field on the configuration page does, for example.APs should be more adaptable to denser client regions and, most important, the logs on the ZoneDirector should be classified into groups, such as type of logs and alerts.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
At this price point, I would not mind seeing a four-way channel, instead of a 3x3 or a 4x4, like they do in the Cisco Aironet system with their other brand. For the same price point in this other Cisco brand, it is a lot cheaper, and you can get a slightly better throughput than you can with these.​If you are wondering if Meraki can work for you, contact one of their representatives because they will do onsite trials where you can set up their system. If it does not work, you can send it back to them for no charge.​​Negotiate the deal put in front of you!

Read more »

The only complaint I have about Ruckus is the price, but considering other enterprise WiFi products are similarly priced, I feel Ruckus is a superior product.It's definitely a good value. It's more expensive than some of the other offerings out there, but when you compare it to other enterprise-class gear, it's very well priced. And the beauty of it is, because it has better range because of their patented BeamFlex - which is the way they can send and receive and listen to signals - you can actually use fewer access points. That means that it's a cheaper overall project.​Pricing is very competitive for an enterprise solution. Regarding licensing, always carry the support contract on the controller (not needed on APs)​.​The cost can be prohibitive for many as it is a high-end product in the WiFi market.​

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless LAN solutions are best for your needs.
287,901 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
RANKING
Views
18,842
Comparisons
15,181
Reviews
4
Followers
874
Avg. Rating
9.0
Views
11,140
Comparisons
9,124
Reviews
7
Followers
1,161
Avg. Rating
9.3
Top Comparisons
Top ComparisonsSee more Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN competitors »
Compared 43% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
See more Ruckus Wireless competitors »
Also Known As
Also Known AsMR18, MR26, MR32, MR34, MR66, MR72, Meraki Wireless LAN, Meraki WLAN
Website/Video
Website/VideoCisco
Ruckus
Overview
OverviewCisco Meraki access points are built from the highest grade components and carefully optimized for a seamless user experience. The outcome: faster connections, greater user capacity, more coverage, and fewer support calls. The Cisco Meraki dashboard gives visibility into the network users, their devices, and their applications. Armed with rich analytics, administrators can quickly create access control and application usage policies, optimizing both the end-user experience and network security.The Virtual SmartZone Data Plane (vSZ-D) is a wireless LAN data plane appliance in a virtualized form factor. Made to work seamlessly with the Ruckus Virtual SmartZone Wireless LAN Controller (vSZ), the vSZ-D enables secure tunneled WLANs from Ruckus APs while minimizing CAPEX spending and maximizing Wi-Fi deployment flexibility and scale. Operators, ISPs and large enterprises can deploy the vSZ-D in a centralized data center with the vSZ, or at specific venues in a distributed topology.
OFFER
Learn more about Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN
Learn more about Ruckus Wireless
Sample Customers
Sample CustomersAdvanced Medical Transport, Banco de Guayaquil, Baylor Scott & White Health, BH Telecom, Bowling Green State University, Calligaris, Children's Hospital Colorado, City of Biel, Del Papa Distributing, Department of Justice, Dimension Data, Dualtec Cloud Builders, Electricity Authority of Cyprus, Grupo Industrial Saltillo (GIS), Hertz, K&L Gates , LightEdge, Lone Star College System, Management Science Associates, Mindtree, NBC Olympics, Quest, Sony Corporation, The Department of Education in Western Australia, Valley ProteinsAmerican University of Sharjah, Baruch College, Centro Escolar Liceo Santo Tomšs, Chevalier College, Chico Unified School District, Colegio de Fomento El Prado, Columbia Public Schools, Delta School District, Dordt College, Douglas County School District, Drew University, Armonea, Central Utah Clinic, Grove Hill Medical Center, Inner South Community Health Service, Midwest Surgical, Satilla Regional Medical Center, Lyndoch Living, Polonus, Roaring Fork School District, Sonora State, Vivid, Sydney, Players Club, Sandals, Scandic Hotels, Sheraton LAX, Sunbird
Top Industries
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider
21%
Security Firm
10%
Logistics Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
K 12 Educational Company Or School
29%
Comms Service Provider
17%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Retailer
8%
Company Size
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business
43%
Midsize Enterprise
14%
Large Enterprise
43%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
33%
Midsize Enterprise
24%
Large Enterprise
42%
REVIEWERS
Small Business
50%
Midsize Enterprise
13%
Large Enterprise
38%
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Ruckus Wireless and others in Wireless LAN.
Download now
287,901 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email