We performed a comparison between Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN and Ruckus Wireless WAN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Aruba Networking, Cisco, Ruckus and others in Wireless LAN."You can easily monitor, manage, and cover all your IT equipment."
"The simplicity is great."
"The most valuable feature of Juniper Mist is the Virtual Network Assistant, powered by artificial intelligence."
"The artificial intelligence feature is very good."
"It provides private network access, helping us protect our company’s devices."
"The most useful feature of Juniper Wireless AP is the reporting Marvis."
"The solution is pretty generic and easy to use."
"The solution is stable."
"I really love their cloud-based dashboard which allows me to see all my locations from one location."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten...The solution's initial setup process was straightforward."
"What I liked about these is that they worked. I didn't touch them or do anything with them. They were up and running when I came here. Once they are set up and running, you don't have to worry about them."
"The solution is very easy to use."
"The most important feature is flexibility."
"The emailing of statuses is the most valuable feature."
"The visibility of the site is most useful."
"It is cloud-based. It has a GUI rather than a command line, and it just works."
"One of the standout features is the ease of installation and commissioning, making the whole process very straightforward."
"The initial setup of Ruckus Wireless WAN is very easy."
"Ruckus Wireless WAN's best feature is its virtual controller."
"The ratio of highest quality to value is the most valuable."
"One of its notable advantages lies in the superior performance of its antennas and radios."
"We use things like VLAN and all the multibeam features that are built in, but at the end of the day, the most important thing for us is to get a good signal and site-wide coverage."
"Ruckus Wireless WAN is simple to use. Its coverage is better than other tools."
"The performance is very nice, the throughput is better than any other product, and it's reliable."
"Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series) could improve if the MIST platform had a built-in master key. This would be an advantage."
"Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points’ support services need improvement."
"The product should include adaptive Wi-Fi to show a more accurate location."
"The solution is expensive."
"The price could be better."
"Improving third-party integration is key for Juniper Mist's next release."
"The pricing should be made cheaper."
"There is room for improvement in terms of support and installation."
"if there is a better feature, they write it as beta so you have to be careful."
"Technical support can be improved, as well as having more detailed capabilities to go without using an API."
"They could also add some more controls for guest access. For example, when you have a captive portal, it would be nice to limit the amount of time users can stay connected per day. Right now, you can only configure the splash frequency. And you can set the connection for one hour, but you have to use the billing feature."
"Its price could be improved."
"The licensing isn't very customer-centric. They may have improved it, but previously, if you forgot to pay on a certain day, your service would be shut off."
"The product doesn't effectively do its job anymore since some issues crop up in it once you run out of your subscription licensing...Improvements are needed in the licensing part of the tool."
"Recently I have seen that the Meraki access point, maybe due to congestion, just kicks off my customers, mostly when they are in Zoom meetings or Teams meetings and they have to reconnect."
"I would like to see integration with sensors."
"The product needs to improve its latency and performance."
"In Cisco, there is a configuration where it automatically switches from the 2.4 GHz to 5.2 GHz frequency. But with Ruckus, usually, we need to manually define whether we want to use the 2.4 GHz or 5.2 GHz."
"Ruckus Wireless WAN we have a lot of component shortages in the world. This has impacted deliveries. We have large back orders of the solution."
"I would not consider this solution to be stable."
"The connectivity and mobility for users could be improved."
"I would like to see the billing system improved by adding a billing system integration."
"Ruckus Wireless WAN needs to improve its pricing."
"I believe there is room for improvement in the price structure."
More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is ranked 4th in Wireless LAN with 115 reviews while Ruckus Wireless WAN is ranked 2nd in Wireless WAN with 45 reviews. Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is rated 8.2, while Ruckus Wireless WAN is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN writes "Offers good mobility, stability and scalability ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ruckus Wireless WAN writes " Offers robust outdoor connectivity, but signal strength and support need improvement". Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Ubiquiti Wireless, Mist AI and Cloud, Ruckus Wireless and Cisco Wireless, whereas Ruckus Wireless WAN is most compared with Ubiquiti Wireless, Cambium Networks Wireless WAN and HPE Wireless WAN.
We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
