We performed a comparison between Cisco NAC Manager and Server [EOL] and Forescout Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, HPE Aruba Networking, Fortinet and others in Network Access Control (NAC).Earn 20 points
Cisco NAC Manager and Server [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Network Access Control (NAC) while Forescout Platform is ranked 4th in Network Access Control (NAC) with 69 reviews. Cisco NAC Manager and Server [EOL] is rated 10.0, while Forescout Platform is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Cisco NAC Manager and Server [EOL] writes "Helps by tracking port VLAN configurations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Forescout Platform writes "We can go granular on each endpoint, quarantine non-compliant machines, and target vulnerabilities through scripting". Cisco NAC Manager and Server [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Forescout Platform is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Aruba ClearPass, Fortinet FortiNAC, Nozomi Networks and Armis.
See our list of best Network Access Control (NAC) vendors.
We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.