• Home
  • Cisco NAC Manager and Server [EOL] vs. Impulse Point SafeConnect

Cisco NAC Manager and Server [EOL] vs Impulse Point SafeConnect comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Buyer's Guide
Network Access Control (NAC)
March 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cisco NAC Manager and Server [EOL] and Impulse Point SafeConnect based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, HPE Aruba Networking, Fortinet and others in Network Access Control (NAC).
To learn more, read our detailed Network Access Control (NAC) Report (Updated: March 2024).
Download the complete report
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Helps by tracking port VLAN configurations.
Helps by tracking port VLAN configurations.
Chong Dan
Easy to scale, enforces policies well, and has responsive technical support
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "For our tier group, for one year, the cost is probably around $10,000 for the license. If you do multi-year, you could get two years, and you could get it for about $8,000 per year. If you do three years, you get it around $7,000 a year."

    • More Impulse Point SafeConnect Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Network Access Control (NAC)
    17th
    out of 23 in Network Access Control (NAC)
    Views
    162
    Comparisons
    81
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Buyer's Guide
    Network Access Control (NAC)
    March 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, HPE Aruba Networking, Fortinet and others in Network Access Control (NAC). Updated: March 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    NAC Manager and Server
    SafeConnect
    Learn More
    Cisco
    Video Not Available
    Impulse Point
    Video Not Available
    Overview
    Cisco NAC Manage is a centralized, web-based console for establishing roles, checks, rules, and policies. Cisco NAC Server enforces access privileges based on endpoint compliance and user authentication.

    SafeConnect provides the ability to automate the enforcement of security compliance and network access control policies (based on identity, device type, location, and ownership), and gathers a wealth of real-time and historical context-aware device data so you can make more informed and intelligent decisions.

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    Aerohive Solution
    Buyer's Guide
    Network Access Control (NAC)
    March 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, HPE Aruba Networking, Fortinet and others in Network Access Control (NAC). Updated: March 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Cisco NAC Manager and Server [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Network Access Control (NAC) while Impulse Point SafeConnect is ranked 17th in Network Access Control (NAC). Cisco NAC Manager and Server [EOL] is rated 10.0, while Impulse Point SafeConnect is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Cisco NAC Manager and Server [EOL] writes "Helps by tracking port VLAN configurations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Impulse Point SafeConnect writes "Easy to scale, enforces policies well, and has responsive technical support". Cisco NAC Manager and Server [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Impulse Point SafeConnect is most compared with Forescout Platform.

    See our list of best Network Access Control (NAC) vendors.

    We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.