Cisco Network Assurance Engine vs RedSeal comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Cisco Logo
67 views|10 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
RedSeal Logo
31 views|23 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cisco Network Assurance Engine and RedSeal based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Ekahau, NetAlly, iBwave and others in Network Modeling and Simulation.
To learn more, read our detailed Network Modeling and Simulation Report (Updated: March 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"In a short amount of time, you can see what went wrong on a screen in a report.""It is scalable from the beginning. It is a product that you can scale upwards whenever you want.""The standout feature of Cisco Network Assurance Engine is its ability to proactively detect and prevent network issues before they occur.""It is easy to set up."

More Cisco Network Assurance Engine Pros →

"The most valuable features are network mapping and configuration.""This is the only solution in the world that gives you a digital resilience score.""RedSeal integrates the network and gives us a visual or graphical overview of our network. If an organization is geographically dispersed, for instance, with one office in Canada and one office in the Philippines, the whole network, including all devices, is integrated into RedSeal, and you can see from where the traffic is going in and out."

More RedSeal Pros →

Cons
"At the beginning, the setup was complex.""The scalability is one of the biggest failures of the solution.""It needs authentication beyond just local and LDAP. It should also have TACACS+ and RADIUS.""To enhance Cisco Network Assurance Engine, simplifying its interface and making it more user-friendly would be beneficial."

More Cisco Network Assurance Engine Cons →

"Sometimes, it required us to refresh the configuration. When we integrated any of the configurations into the device, sometimes, it could not detect the exact picture of that device. So, we had to reset the device to see that if it was giving true-positive results or false-positive results. In some cases, we were not able to get true-positive results. There was some kind of bug in that version. Its interface is not user-friendly and needs to be improved. It takes time to understand the interface and various options. Skybox has quite a user-friendly interface. They could provide a feature for compliance audit policy if it is already not there. A compliance audit policy ensures that all configurations are based on the best practices standards, such as CIS benchmarks standard or other similar standards. It provides visibility about whether your device configuration is based on best practices or not. Usually, such a feature is provided by other solutions such as Meteor or Tenable Nessus.""The dashboard should be improved to make correlating data easier to do.""One of the areas of concern is the GUI. It is important to our customers that the GUI looks beautiful. It's a Java Client, so you have a Java dependency."

More RedSeal Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "The pricing is based on the number of endpoints and devices, and we have seen it range from mid-five figures to low six figures."
  • More RedSeal Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Modeling and Simulation solutions are best for your needs.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The standout feature of Cisco Network Assurance Engine is its ability to proactively detect and prevent network issues before they occur.
    Top Answer:To enhance Cisco Network Assurance Engine, simplifying its interface and making it more user-friendly would be beneficial. This would enable a wider range of users, including those with basic… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Views
    67
    Comparisons
    10
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    370
    Rating
    7.0
    Views
    31
    Comparisons
    23
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Cisco NAE, Candid
    Learn More
    Overview

    Cisco Network Assurance Engine (NAE) transforms operations in data center networks to a fundamentally more proactive model. Built on Cisco’s patented network verification technology, it is the most comprehensive assurance engine that mathematically verifies the entire network for correctness, giving operators confidence that their network is always operating consistent with intent.

    RedSeal’s network modeling and risk scoring platform builds an accurate, up-to-date model of an organization’s entire, as-built network to visualize access paths, prioritize what to fix, so you can target existing cybersecurity resources to protect your most valuable assets. With RedSeal’s Digital Resilience Score, decision makers can see the security status and benchmark progress toward digital resilience.

    Sample Customers
    West Corporation, Axians Nordic, Robert Bosch, DICTU, Tenaris
    United States Postal Service, Pacific Gas and Electric Co., Interval International
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Government21%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Healthcare Company8%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise75%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise67%
    Buyer's Guide
    Network Modeling and Simulation
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Ekahau, NetAlly, iBwave and others in Network Modeling and Simulation. Updated: March 2024.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Cisco Network Assurance Engine is ranked 5th in Network Modeling and Simulation with 4 reviews while RedSeal is ranked 20th in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management. Cisco Network Assurance Engine is rated 8.0, while RedSeal is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Cisco Network Assurance Engine writes "Helps to easily detect and resolve issues like security threats, bandwidth usage concerns, and performance bottlenecks". On the other hand, the top reviewer of RedSeal writes "Provides a graphical overview of our network and is easy to deploy, but needs a user-friendly interface and a feature for compliance audit policy". Cisco Network Assurance Engine is most compared with , whereas RedSeal is most compared with Skybox Security Suite, AlgoSec, FireMon Security Manager, Ekahau Site Survey and Darktrace.

    We monitor all Network Modeling and Simulation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.