Most Helpful Review
Enables us to have fewer devices and fewer physical interfaces, yet retain a more extensive logical setup
Researched Cisco Nexus but chose HPE ProCurve: Stable, easy to set up, and the technical support is good
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
The most valuable feature of the 7700 series is probably the multi-context subset VRS, which lets you use multi-VRS, multi-context, and also VPC setup, where you have two logical devices that are still separate in terms of management planes, but have shared, virtual core channels.
Solid product, communications and support from a well-known dependable company.
Nexus provides inner redundancy. It allows us to perform updates on individual switches, while still maintaining reliability and uptime on the server.
It provides a very flexible connection to a server. When you go into history and the VPC, it provides a very flexible connection from it. Once a server goes down I can instruct it easily. So the network actually keeps quality even if onsite it is down.
The most valuable features are the great performance, high availability and easy administration.
We leverage Cisco DCNM a lot, which allows us to automate.
The setup was very easy, but managing it in operations was very complex.
The most valuable feature of Cisco Nexus is the performance, flexibility, configuration, and cost. It's not a traditional pricing model from Cisco. They've offered our company a considerable reduction in price. That makes Cisco Nexus now very competitive with other vendors.
The most valuable features are the price and the warranty.
This is a very reliable solution.
The user interface is the most valuable aspect of the solution for us.
The web page interface is very convenient and easy to use for setting up your feedback loops.
The user interface is simple to use.
ProCurve is easy to configure and to know how to create each connection and configuration.
It has a lifetime warranty, that includes lifetime updates.
The LAN features give us exactly what we need.
The initial setup was pretty complex, mostly because of our environment, having to do multi-context. That's where you have a lot of different logical routes that are in one physical device, and it can get kind of complex trying to think about how to set all that up. You really have to whiteboard it out a lot.
The product could be updated more frequently for other phone model support.
Overall, I wish it was a more intuitive OS.
There is some room for improvement when it comes to the frequency on the network.
Our only complaint is about the licensing because it can always be a little more cost-effective.
We lag on the configuration. The changes make a difference in troubleshooting.
One improvement needed is support for Multi-CAD scale that we were concerned about. We're not hitting any limits at this point.
I would like to see more granularity.
These switches can be made more stable and robust.
I would like to see some kind of packet tracer where people can study how the switch is operating.
The solution should offer different gigabit interfaces. Right now, they have ten gigabits. However, for our needs, we only need one gigabit. We don't need 24 or 48 ports. We only need eight to ten. HPE should introduce into their portfolio some smaller and more compact options.
The dashboards could be improved to be more interesting.
I would like to see integration with HPE OneView.
Procurve would work better if it had more options like the web environment.
If you make a change and you disconnect yourself from the switch, you will create an issue.
We do occasionally have issues with the solution and need to change out the switches sometimes. This can be due to the fan, but, in most cases, it's because the power supply was broken.
Pricing and Cost Advice
We have a three-year subscription for our licensing fees.
We have three hundred to four hundred data centers of Nexus. So the coverage associated with Smart Net is 27 by 4, is basically what we spend each year. If the incentives get better, which I know they're working on, it would be great but right now we're buying year to year.
Our licensing costs for this solution are approximately $100K a year for the switching part.
It's around $160K a year for our license.
This solution should be made more affordable.
Our licensing fees are paid annually.
We only have a yearly support contract, as we do not use any of the subscription-based functions at this time.
The licensing fees for this solution are approximately $800,000 USD annually.
The price of this product is cheap.
This is an expensive switch.
The purchasing cost a few years ago for two units was approx €5,000.
The cost of HPE ProCurve is good.
You buy the switch and that's it.
out of 18 in LAN Switching
Average Words per Review
out of 18 in LAN Switching
Average Words per Review
Compared 31% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 32% of the time.
Compared 27% of the time.
Compared 22% of the time.
Also Known As
|ProCurve, HP ProCurve|
|Cisco||Hewlett Packard Enterprise|
|The Cisco Nexus family of switches is designed to meet the stringent requirements of the next-generation data center. Not simply bigger or faster, these switches offer the following characteristics: infrastructure that can be scaled cost-effectively and that helps you increase energy, budget, and resource efficiency, transport that can navigate the transition to 10 Gigabit Ethernet and unified fabric and can also handle architectural changes such as virtualization, Web 2.0 applications, and cloud computing and operational continuity to meet your need for an environment where system availability is assumed and maintenance windows are rare if not totally extinct.||HP Networking (HP ProCurve) products enable a cost-effective network that's agile, flexible, and fully interoperable. Boost availability, performance, monitoring, and productivity with HP network software, services, and support.|
Learn more about Cisco Nexus
Learn more about HPE ProCurve
|Advanced Medical Transport, Banco de Guayaquil, Baylor Scott & White Health, BH Telecom, Bowling Green State University, Calligaris, Children's Hospital Colorado, City of Biel, Del Papa Distributing, Department of Justice, Dimension Data, Dualtec Cloud Builders, Electricity Authority of Cyprus, Grupo Industrial Saltillo (GIS), Hertz, K&L Gates , LightEdge, Lone Star College System, Management Science Associates, Mindtree, NBC Olympics, Quest, Sony Corporation, The Department of Education in Western Australia, Valley Proteins||Borden Ladner Gervais LLP, Cardinal Newman Catholic Secondary School, DY 4 Systems, EdgeWing, Edmonton Public Schools District, Halton Catholic District School Board, Hartwick College, Hatch Associates, Huntingdon College, Roseville Joint Union High School District, Saddleback Valley Unified School District, One Superior Place|
Financial Services Firm12%
Comms Service Provider30%
Software R&D Company20%
No Data Available