Compare Cisco Nexus vs. HPE ProCurve

Cisco Nexus is ranked 2nd in LAN Switching with 68 reviews while HPE ProCurve is ranked 5th in LAN Switching with 2 reviews. Cisco Nexus is rated 8.6, while HPE ProCurve is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Cisco Nexus writes "A high-performance switch that is designed for lossless data and our customers are happy with". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HPE ProCurve writes "Easy to manage and configure with good pricing". Cisco Nexus is most compared with Cisco Catalyst Switches, Arista Networks Platform and Juniper QFabric, whereas HPE ProCurve is most compared with Dell PowerConnect Switches, NETGEAR Switches and Cisco Catalyst Switches.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Cisco Nexus Logo
5,242 views|3,830 comparisons
HPE ProCurve Logo
1,691 views|1,504 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use HPE ProCurve? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Netgear, Cisco, Dell EMC and others in LAN Switching. Updated: November 2019.
383,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The most valuable feature of the 7700 series is probably the multi-context subset VRS, which lets you use multi-VRS, multi-context, and also VPC setup, where you have two logical devices that are still separate in terms of management planes, but have shared, virtual core channels.Solid product, communications and support from a well-known dependable company.Nexus provides inner redundancy. It allows us to perform updates on individual switches, while still maintaining reliability and uptime on the server.It provides a very flexible connection to a server. When you go into history and the VPC, it provides a very flexible connection from it. Once a server goes down I can instruct it easily. So the network actually keeps quality even if onsite it is down.The most valuable features are the great performance, high availability and easy administration.We leverage Cisco DCNM a lot, which allows us to automate.The setup was very easy, but managing it in operations was very complex.The most valuable feature of Cisco Nexus is the performance, flexibility, configuration, and cost. It's not a traditional pricing model from Cisco. They've offered our company a considerable reduction in price. That makes Cisco Nexus now very competitive with other vendors.

Read more »

The solution is fast and inexpensive.It's easy to manage and configure. The configurations can be exported and imported to another solution.

Read more »

Cons
The initial setup was pretty complex, mostly because of our environment, having to do multi-context. That's where you have a lot of different logical routes that are in one physical device, and it can get kind of complex trying to think about how to set all that up. You really have to whiteboard it out a lot.The product could be updated more frequently for other phone model support.Overall, I wish it was a more intuitive OS.There is some room for improvement when it comes to the frequency on the network.Our only complaint is about the licensing because it can always be a little more cost-effective.We lag on the configuration. The changes make a difference in troubleshooting.One improvement needed is support for Multi-CAD scale that we were concerned about. We're not hitting any limits at this point.I would like to see more granularity.

Read more »

The solution doesn't have web-based management, which is why we've moved to a different solution.The only things that might need improvement would be the administrative tools and the graphical interface. The GUI could be improved on the administrative interface, for example.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
We have a three-year subscription for our licensing fees.We have three hundred to four hundred data centers of Nexus. So the coverage associated with Smart Net is 27 by 4, is basically what we spend each year. If the incentives get better, which I know they're working on, it would be great but right now we're buying year to year.Our licensing costs for this solution are approximately $100K a year for the switching part.It's around $160K a year for our license.This solution should be made more affordable.Our licensing fees are paid annually.We only have a yearly support contract, as we do not use any of the subscription-based functions at this time.The licensing fees for this solution are approximately $800,000 USD annually.

Read more »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which LAN Switching solutions are best for your needs.
383,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
2nd
out of 18 in LAN Switching
Views
5,242
Comparisons
3,830
Reviews
68
Average Words per Review
436
Avg. Rating
8.5
5th
out of 18 in LAN Switching
Views
1,691
Comparisons
1,504
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Top Comparisons
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 25% of the time.
Also Known As
ProCurve, HP ProCurve
Learn
Cisco
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Overview
The Cisco Nexus family of switches is designed to meet the stringent requirements of the next-generation data center. Not simply bigger or faster, these switches offer the following characteristics: infrastructure that can be scaled cost-effectively and that helps you increase energy, budget, and resource efficiency, transport that can navigate the transition to 10 Gigabit Ethernet and unified fabric and can also handle architectural changes such as virtualization, Web 2.0 applications, and cloud computing and operational continuity to meet your need for an environment where system availability is assumed and maintenance windows are rare if not totally extinct.HP Networking (HP ProCurve) products enable a cost-effective network that's agile, flexible, and fully interoperable. Boost availability, performance, monitoring, and productivity with HP network software, services, and support.
Offer
Learn more about Cisco Nexus
Learn more about HPE ProCurve
Sample Customers
Advanced Medical Transport, Banco de Guayaquil, Baylor Scott & White Health, BH Telecom, Bowling Green State University, Calligaris, Children's Hospital Colorado, City of Biel, Del Papa Distributing, Department of Justice, Dimension Data, Dualtec Cloud Builders, Electricity Authority of Cyprus, Grupo Industrial Saltillo (GIS), Hertz, K&L Gates , LightEdge, Lone Star College System, Management Science Associates, Mindtree, NBC Olympics, Quest, Sony Corporation, The Department of Education in Western Australia, Valley ProteinsBorden Ladner Gervais LLP, Cardinal Newman Catholic Secondary School, DY 4 Systems, EdgeWing, Edmonton Public Schools District, Halton Catholic District School Board, Hartwick College, Hatch Associates, Huntingdon College, Roseville Joint Union High School District, Saddleback Valley Unified School District, One Superior Place
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Healthcare Company15%
Government15%
Financial Services Firm12%
Manufacturing Company12%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider20%
Software R&D Company19%
Government15%
Financial Services Firm8%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Netgear, Cisco, Dell EMC and others in LAN Switching. Updated: November 2019.
383,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all LAN Switching reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email