We performed a comparison between Cisco NGIPS and ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We are satisfied with the technical support."
"The solution gives us a lot of visibility into our security."
"The most valuable feature is that it is able to detect any form of infiltration."
"It has good intelligence. It does a great job at stopping threats."
"I like how NGIPS has everything in one console."
"The traffic filter of this solution is very valuable to us, and to our clients."
"I have found the filter and the antivirus to be most valuable."
"We like the Cisco product, the concept, and the tech intelligence."
"It stands out for its intuitive and efficient user interface, robust detection capabilities with minimal false positives, and the ability to handle encrypted traffic, making it a valuable asset for network security and management."
"It is scalable."
"It is very easy to collect and handle data in ExtraHop Reveal(X) Cloud. Integration with Big Data is also easy. Many of our customers integrate it with Big Data platforms like Splunk or Elastic. It is also easy to handle and easy to understand."
"The biggest problem with most Cisco products is that the interface is lagging behind the competition. The user interface could be updated and improved."
"The look and feel of the console could be updated."
"We would like an option to search through the logs to be added to this solution."
"There are some features not found in Firepower, like data loss prevention, and SSO, to have a connection between Cisco and Active Directory which was introduced on other products."
"The integration can be more secure."
"I would like to see a more user-friendly interface."
"The solution would be better if it offered customers more integrations and more signatures."
"The initial setup is a bit complex because it requires a lot of configuration, firewall and zoning."
"A drawback includes bucket storage limitations for payload data, necessitating timely extraction for thorough investigations."
"There needs to be more support."
"They can include integration with SAP. Currently, no vendor provides network performance monitoring in the SAP market. It is a very big market. We have around 400 customers for SAP in Korea. In the USA, there are more than 10,000 customers."
Cisco NGIPS is ranked 5th in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) with 62 reviews while ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 is ranked 22nd in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) with 3 reviews. Cisco NGIPS is rated 8.2, while ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Cisco NGIPS writes "Very effective for malware and signature-based anomalies but stability needs improvement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 writes "A competitive choice for network detection and response with exceptional user interface, ease of implementation and minimal false positives". Cisco NGIPS is most compared with Check Point IPS, Fortinet FortiGate IPS, Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System, Cisco Sourcefire SNORT and Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention, whereas ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 is most compared with ExtraHop Reveal(x), Corelight, Forescout Platform and Fortinet FortiGate IPS. See our Cisco NGIPS vs. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 report.
See our list of best Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) vendors.
We monitor all Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.