Compare Cisco NGIPS vs. Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco NGIPS vs. Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
464,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"One of the key advantages for us is we define a 24/7 service around it. We use far more of Vectra alerts than we do with our SIEM product because we understand that when we get an alert from Vectra we actually need to do something about it.""It is doing some artificial intelligence. If it sees a server doing a lot of things, then it will assume that is normal. So, it is looking for anomalous behavior, things that are out of context which helps us reduce time. Therefore, we don't have to look in all the logs. We just wait for Vectra to say, "This one is behaving strange," then we can investigate that part.""One of the most valuable features of the platform is its ability to provide you with aggregated risk scores based on impact and certainty of threats being detected. This is both applied to individual and host detections. This is important because it enables us to use this platform to prioritize the most likely imminent threats. So, it reduces alert fatigue follow ups for security operation center analysts. It also provides us with an ability to prioritize limited resources.""The solution's ability to reduce alerts, by rolling up numerous alerts to create a single incident or campaign, helps in that it collapses all the events to a particular host, or a particular detection to a set of hosts. So it doesn't generate too many alerts. By and large, whatever alerts it generates are actionable, and actionable within the day.""It gives you access, with Recall, to instant visibility into your network through something like a SIEM solution. For us, being able to correlate all of this network data without having to manage it, has provided immediate value. It gives us the ability to really work on the stuff where I and my team have expertise, instead of having to manage a SIEM solution...""The solution provide visibility into behaviors across the full lifecycle of an attack in our network, beyond just the Internet gateway. It makes our security operations much more effective because we are now looking not just at traffic on the border, but we're looking at east-west internal traffic. Now, not only will we see if an exploit kit is being downloaded, but we would be able to see then if that exploit kit was then laterally distributed into our environment.""Vectra produces actionable data using automation. That has helped us. It's less manpower now to look at incidents, which has definitely increased efficiency. Right now, in a lot of cases, our mean time to detection is within zero days. This tells me by the time something happened, and we were able to detect it, it was within the same day.""One of the most valuable features is all the correlation that it does using AI and machine learning. An example would be alerting on a host and then alerting on other things, like abnormal behavior, that it has noticed coming from the same host. It's valuable because we're a very lean team."

More Vectra AI Pros »

"This solution has helped improve productivity and detect attacks before they happen.""It has good intelligence. It does a great job at stopping threats.""Cisco is number one in the technical support. It's good technical support and this is actually a problem when we do the recruitment for some other products. Other products you are on hold forever and the support might be not the best compared to Cisco.""The solution is stable. This is one of the good things in Firepower. Especially if we use ESE with it.""The initial setup wasn't complex or complicated.""It has aligned the features in accordance to our strategic needs""The most valuable feature of this solution is its modularity, so whenever you need to upgrade or add another service, you don't need to buy another box.""We primarily use this solution as an application filter and for IPS."

More Cisco NGIPS Pros »

"One of the most valuable features is the anti-malware protection.""The most valuable feature of Palo Alto Threat Prevention for our company is the next generation firewall.""Most of the features of Palo Alto Threat Prevention are alright. I recommend features like content filtering, IP address, & intelligent firewalls. The reporting feature is very good.""The initial setup was straightforward. It's quite easy. Deployment took one to two weeks.""The application control and vulnerability protection are the most valuable features.""I find the malware protection very handy.""The most valuable features are the simplicity, transparency, and overall ease of management.""With the IP address flag, I was able to see that I was being hacked. The moment there was an interaction between somebody on my network and that IP, the solution was able to flag it, and we were able to protect ourselves."

More Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention Pros »

Cons
"The solution has not reduced the security analyst workload in our organization because we still need to SIEM. Unfortunately, while Vectra, for us, is a brilliant tool for network investigations, giving wonderful visibility, it doesn't go the whole way to replace our SIEM that is needed for compliance. So, I still have the same amount of alerting and logging that I did before. It gives us more defined ability to see incidents, but it doesn't give us enough information to satisfy a PCI or 27001 audit.""We would like to see more information with the syslogs. The syslogs that they send to our SIEM are a bit short compared to what you can see. It would be helpful if they send us more data that we can incorporate into our SIEM, then can correlate with other events.""You are always limited with visibility on the host due to the fact that it is a network based tool. It gives you visibility on certain elements of the attack path, but it doesn't necessarily give you visibility on everything. Specifically, the initial intrusion side of things that doesn't necessarily see the initial compromise. It doesn't see stuff that goes on the host, such as where scripts are run. Even though you are seeing traffic, it doesn't necessarily see the malicious payload. Therefore, it's very difficult for it to identify these type of host-driven complex attacks.""One thing which I have found where there could be improvement is with regard to the architecture, a little bit: how the brains and sensors function. It needs more flexibility with regard to the brain. If there were some flexibility in that regard, that would be helpful, because changing the mode of the brain is complex. In some cases, the change is permanent. You cannot revert it.""Some of the customization could be improved. Everything is provided for you as an easy solution to use, but working with it and doing specific development could be worked on a bit more in the scope of an incident response team.""Some of their integrations with other sources of data, like external threat feeds, took a bit more work than I had hoped to get integrated.""I would like to see a bit more strategic metrics instead of technical data. Information that I could show to my executive management team or board would be valuable.""It does a little bit of packet capture on alert so you can look at the packet capture activity going on, but it doesn't collect a whole lot of data. Sometimes it's only one or two frames, sometimes it does collect more. That's why they have the addition of their Recall platform, because that really does help expand the capability."

More Vectra AI Cons »

"I would like to see better integration with SIEMs.""In the next release I would like to see better reporting. I also find it's hard to act on the data it gives you.""The file trajectory, the trace in contamination files, could be improved.""There are some features not found in Firepower, like data loss prevention, and SSO, to have a connection between Cisco and Active Directory which was introduced on other products.""More flexibility with the dashboards is needed because some of them are not fully developed.""The aspect of private party integration solutions could be improved.""If there was a software-based solution for scaling up then it would be much better.""The inclusion of bandwidth management features would improve this product."

More Cisco NGIPS Cons »

"Right now we are focusing on email. If Palo Alto can increase the features related to email filtering and the new malware, it would help us protect our systems.""The organization mail security solutions could be improved. There is no mail security solution available.""Generally, to deploy it will take some downtime, about a day.""It's not so easy to set up a test environment, because it's not so easy to get the test license. The vendor only gives you 90 days for a test license; it's a tough license to get.""The solution needs to improve its local technical support services. There is no premium support offered in our market.""I think they can use some improvement on FID.""The price of licenses should be lowered to make it less costly to scale our solution.""Sometimes when you want to group a set of ports, and communicate with Palo Alto, you cannot group TCP and UDP ports together. This needs to be adjusted."

More Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"We are running at about 90,000 pounds per year. The solution is a licensed cost. The hardware that they gave us was pretty much next to nothing. It is the license that we're paying for.""The license is based on the concurrent IP addresses that it's investigating. We have 9,800 to 10,000 IP addresses.""There are additional features that can be purchased in addition to the standard licensing fee, such as Cognito Recall and Stream.""We have a desire to increase our use. However, it all comes down to budget. It's a very expensive tool that is very difficult to prove business support for. We would like to have two separate networks. We have our corporate network and PCI network, which is segregated due to payment processing. We don't have it for deployed in the PCI network. It would be good to have it fully deployed there to provide us with additional monitoring and control, but the cost associated with their licensing model makes it prohibitively expensive to deploy.""At the time of purchase, we found the pricing acceptable. We had an urgency to get something in place because we had a minor breach that occurred at the tail end of 2016 to the beginning of 2017. This indicated we had a lack of ability to detect things on the network. Hence, why we moved quickly to get into the tool in place. We found things like Bitcoin mining and botnets which we closed quickly. In that regard, it was worth the money.""The pricing is very good. It's less expensive than many of the tools out there.""The pricing is high."

More Vectra AI Pricing and Cost Advice »

"We buy the licensing on a yearly basis, when we renew our contract. It is around $14,000.""The price for additional throughput is the highest in the industry.""Licensing fees for this solution are $3,500 USD, and there are no additional costs.""Cisco products are always expensive, but if you can afford the price then it's a great solution.""Pricing depends on negotiation with the vendor, although I can say that it is moderate.""The cost of the license depends on the level of support that you have with Cisco.""This is an expensive product, with the biggest cost being the license that keeps the service going.""There are licensing fees depending on the features that you are using."

More Cisco NGIPS Pricing and Cost Advice »

"It's not too expensive.""It is an expensive solution and I would like to see a drop in price.""If you want to have all of the good features then you have to pay extra for licensing.""The pricing has improved with the newer generation of their Firewalls, but the price could always be lower."

More Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software solutions are best for your needs.
464,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The two platforms take a fundamentally different approach to NDR. Corelight is limited to use cases that require the… more »
Top Answer: The dashboard gives me a scoring system that allows me to prioritize things that I should look at. I may not necessarily… more »
Top Answer: We have a one-year subscription that covers support and everything. There is no other overhead.
Top Answer: We use the solution to secure our client's networks.
Top Answer: Arbor would be the best bid, apart from Arbor, Palo Alto and Fortinet have good solutions. As this is an ISP, I would… more »
Top Answer: The most valuable features are that it's user-friendly, has interesting features, URL filtering, and threat prevention.
Top Answer: We use four Palo Alto solutions in stand-alone mode and but it's hard to use when I use it in Panorama. Palo Alto's… more »
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Vectra Networks, Vectra AI NDR
Sourcefire NGIPS, Firepower NGIPS
Learn More
Overview

Vectra® is the leader in network detection and response – from cloud and data center workloads to user and IoT devices. Its Cognito® platform accelerates threat detection and investigation using artificial intelligence to collect, store and enrich network metadata with the right context to detect, hunt and investigate known and unknown threats in real time. Vectra offers three applications on the Cognito platform to address high-priority use cases. Cognito Stream™ sends security-enriched metadata to data lakes and SIEMs. Cognito Recall™ is a cloud-based application to store and investigate threats in enriched metadata. And Cognito Detect™ uses AI to reveal and prioritize hidden and unknown attackers at speed.

Cisco Firepower NGIPS provides network visibility, threat intelligence, automation and industry leading threat effectiveness. Gartner has ranked Firepower NGIPS as a Magic Quadrant Leader for seven years running, and the independent NSS Labs testing organization consistently rates it as a “Recommended” IPS solution for eight years.

Threats do not discriminate between application delivery vectors, requiring an approach that has full visibility into all application traffic, including SSL encrypted content, with full user context. Threat Prevention leverages the visibility of our next-generation firewall to inspect all traffic, automatically preventing known threats, regardless of port, protocol or SSL encryption.

Offer
Learn more about Vectra AI
Learn more about Cisco NGIPS
Learn more about Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention
Sample Customers
Tribune Media Group, Barry University, Aruba Networks, Good Technology, Riverbed, Santa Clara University, Securities Exchange, Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association
American Electric Power, Huntington Bank, Keycorp, Nationwide, Transunion, Marriott, Inova Health, Ford, Thomson Reuters, Dow Chemical, Equifax, Chevron, Walmart, Coca Cola
University of Arkansas, JBG SMITH, SkiStar AB, TRI-AD, Temple University, Telkom Indonesia
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm18%
Mining And Metals Company18%
Retailer18%
University18%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider30%
Computer Software Company23%
Government6%
Financial Services Firm6%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm15%
Non Tech Company8%
Mining And Metals Company8%
Security Firm8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider31%
Computer Software Company20%
Healthcare Company10%
Government8%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm29%
Comms Service Provider29%
Aerospace/Defense Firm14%
Energy/Utilities Company14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company24%
Comms Service Provider22%
Government6%
Healthcare Company6%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Midsize Enterprise8%
Large Enterprise92%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business18%
Midsize Enterprise26%
Large Enterprise56%
REVIEWERS
Small Business41%
Midsize Enterprise18%
Large Enterprise41%
REVIEWERS
Small Business25%
Midsize Enterprise33%
Large Enterprise42%
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco NGIPS vs. Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
464,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Cisco NGIPS is ranked 5th in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software with 21 reviews while Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention is ranked 7th in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software with 11 reviews. Cisco NGIPS is rated 8.2, while Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Cisco NGIPS writes "The anomaly baseline formation links the network, then anything that goes away from the norm is also flagged". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention writes "Easy to install, use, and manage, with extended trial-license options available". Cisco NGIPS is most compared with Trend Micro TippingPoint NGIPS, McAfee Network Security Platform, Darktrace, Cisco Stealthwatch and Check Point IPS, whereas Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention is most compared with Darktrace, Cisco Stealthwatch, Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall, Splunk User Behavior Analytics and McAfee Network Security Platform. See our Cisco NGIPS vs. Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention report.

See our list of best Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software vendors.

We monitor all Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.