We performed a comparison between Cisco Piston Enterprise OS and OpenText Cloud Service Automation based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, Nutanix, IBM and others in Cloud Management."It offers enough support so that you don't need to have the need to get another device."
"The most valuable feature of Micro Focus Cloud Service is how user friendly the solution is."
"The tool's most valuable feature is life cycle management."
"The solution is just too expensive, so maybe the pricing could be better."
"OpenText Cloud Service Automation needs to incorporate easier installation. It should improve skills and quality of support."
"I would like fewer restrictions as a software tester."
More OpenText Cloud Service Automation Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Cisco Piston Enterprise OS is ranked 51st in Cloud Management while OpenText Cloud Service Automation is ranked 27th in Cloud Management with 6 reviews. Cisco Piston Enterprise OS is rated 9.0, while OpenText Cloud Service Automation is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Cisco Piston Enterprise OS writes "A simple interface and helpful support for a solution that grows with us". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Cloud Service Automation writes "Comes with life cycle management features but needs improvement in installation ". Cisco Piston Enterprise OS is most compared with , whereas OpenText Cloud Service Automation is most compared with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform.
See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
