Cisco Piston OpenStack vs Stratoscale [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Cisco Logo
32 views|16 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Stratoscale Logo
views| comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "We pay a yearly licensing fee for the solution."
  • More Cisco Piston OpenStack Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which OpenStack solutions are best for your needs.
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Cisco has a very wide network-based competency.
    Top Answer:We pay a yearly licensing fee for the solution.
    Top Answer:Cisco Piston OpenStack needs to be more closely integrated between different solutions to work seamlessly for the client and the deployment team.
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    6th
    out of 7 in OpenStack
    Views
    32
    Comparisons
    16
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    397
    Rating
    7.0
    Unranked
    In OpenStack
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Piston OpenStack
    Learn More
    Stratoscale
    Video Not Available
    Overview
    Information Not Available
    Stratoscale is the cloud infrastructure company, allowing enterprises to deploy an AWS-compatible region in any data center. Stratoscale Symphony, can be deployed in minutes on commodity x86 servers, creating an Amazon Web Services (AWS) compatible region and offering AWS-compatible services including EC2, S3, EBS, RDS and Kubernetes. Stratoscale was named a “Cool Vendor in Servers and Virtualization” by Gartner and raised over $70M from leading investors including: Battery Ventures, Bessemer Venture Partners, Cisco, Intel, Qualcomm Ventures, SanDisk and Leslie Ventures.
    Sample Customers
    Dualtec Cloud Builders
    SanDisk, Orange, Merck, NTT, Troy Cable, Bezeq, Tieto, Neen, Ofek Cloud Technologies, APA IT, Netkom, SOS Surveillance, Futong, WeBank, Team Netsol

    Cisco Piston OpenStack is ranked 6th in OpenStack with 1 review while Stratoscale [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in OpenStack. Cisco Piston OpenStack is rated 7.0, while Stratoscale [EOL] is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Cisco Piston OpenStack writes "The solution can be used for network services virtualization, but it needs to be more closely integrated between different solutions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Stratoscale [EOL] writes "It is scalable and gives us the ability to provide an AWS region to our clients everywhere". Cisco Piston OpenStack is most compared with , whereas Stratoscale [EOL] is most compared with .

    We monitor all OpenStack reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.