We performed a comparison between Cisco Prime and OpenText Network Operations Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Fortinet, Broadcom and others in Network Management Applications.
"The solution provides data that allows us to time travel through logs and perform remote operations or troubleshooting."
"The most valuable is the assistance for network support."
"The dashboard is a valuable feature. It's very clear, and the metrics make it easy to see the current network situation."
"The installation is easy."
"The most valuable features of Cisco Prime include its comprehensive functionality as a one-stop solution for basic SNMP port management."
"As a large organization, it is difficult to individually monitor every device. Instead, we use Cisco Prime to keep an eye on the network and services. We do not use it as a node tool, as we have other tools for network operation centers. When services go down, it can cause issues, we rely on Cisco Prime to monitor and notify us of any service disruptions. We mainly use Cisco Prime Infrastructure for configuration-level tasks."
"Cisco Prime has been around for a long time, and it keeps getting better and better."
"Enables oversight in order to tweak and tune."
"When it comes to customization, Micro Focus is more mature than its competitors."
"We can detect non-compliant devices and automate remediation actions to cover the gap in the configuration standards."
"The solution can be slow at times."
"The product needs to improve its stability."
"The product is expensive compared to other vendors in the market."
"Lacking in integration with a SIEM tool."
"There is room for improvement in the Access layer."
"The reporting could be simplified and the information made clearer to the user."
"Cisco Prime could improve the graphical user interface."
"I would rate the scalability of Cisco Prime a six out of ten. To scale up from a hundred to a thousand devices, the platform needs to be rebuilt logically. This process might require a downtime window and may involve changing the hardware or upgrading to a larger appliance."
"It may need a more customizable UI."
"Micro Focus Network Management doesn't support end-to-end monitoring of cloud infrastructure. Micro Focus might have different cloud solutions for cloud automation and hybrid cloud management. There are a lot of products that also support automation. That is different, but it should monitor the cloud from an IT operations management perspective."
More OpenText Network Operations Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cisco Prime is ranked 2nd in Network Management Applications with 35 reviews while OpenText Network Operations Management is ranked 12th in Network Management Applications with 2 reviews. Cisco Prime is rated 7.8, while OpenText Network Operations Management is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Cisco Prime writes "Robust, cost-effective, and provides good visibility, but the scalability could improve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Network Operations Management writes "Good integration capabilities, good reliability, and is user-friendly". Cisco Prime is most compared with Cisco DNA Center, SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager, Aruba Airwave, Huawei eSight and HPE Intelligent Management Center, whereas OpenText Network Operations Management is most compared with .
See our list of best Network Management Applications vendors.
We monitor all Network Management Applications reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
