Compare Cisco SD-WAN vs. FatPipe SD-WAN

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Cisco SD-WAN Logo
19,163 views|16,613 comparisons
FatPipe SD-WAN Logo
203 views|163 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use FatPipe SD-WAN? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Cisco, Barracuda Networks and others in SD-WAN. Updated: November 2020.
447,846 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"We pay for the Cisco Customer Care support, which is a couple of hundred dollars.""80 percent reduction in WAN costs. There are no MPLS or P2P circuits left in the organization.""Cisco is more expensive than some competing products.""SD-WAN as a service is probably something in the neighborhood of $100 to $200 a month per location.""The costs are a bit on the high side.""It is much cheaper than other solutions. Most of our clients are the top 500 companies, and they all have a corporate contract.""The license model is too complex with too many flavors and options. You might not be able to see it from an end user's point of view, but from a telco point of view, their license model is too complex. They should have a flexible license model. If you want to have good pricing, you need to buy it for a two-year, four-year, or five-year license immediately. Some other vendors have much more flexible license models.""It is going to be on a yearly basis. There are no additional costs."

More Cisco SD-WAN Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which SD-WAN solutions are best for your needs.
447,846 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: VeloCloud offers a hybrid deployment model i.e. you can have MPLS and SD WAN running simultaneously while Cisco only supports single deployment scenario.
Top Answer: Cisco SD-WAN has a true software defined architecture separating out the Control, Data and Management/Orchestration layers. It has the best in breed hardware, routing capabilities, integrated Security… more »
Top Answer:  Cisco is a traditional networking play and has successfully transformed from pure hardware to now software defined products. Many network engineers already use the product and makes a lot of… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
2nd
out of 28 in SD-WAN
Views
19,163
Comparisons
16,613
Reviews
17
Average Words per Review
574
Avg. Rating
8.1
19th
out of 28 in SD-WAN
Views
203
Comparisons
163
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Compared 24% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 57% of the time.
Compared 20% of the time.
Also Known As
Viptela, Cisco vEdge Cloud RouterFatPipe Symphony, Symphony, FatPipe Symphony SD-WAN, Symphony SD-WAN
Learn
Cisco
FatPipe Networks
Overview

Deploy software-defined WAN without compromising the application experience.

Symphony is one of the FatPipe’s products which are offering Software-Defined WAN (SD-WAN) solution. This SD-WAN solution simplifies the deployment and management of connectivity at remote sites. More over enterprises deploying Symphony with Orchestrator are not only provided with the ability to centrally control their WANs but also to manage branch office configuration. The appliances can be deployed with zero-touch installation as well.

Offer
Learn more about Cisco SD-WAN
Learn more about FatPipe SD-WAN
Sample Customers
Doyle Research, Ashton Metzler & Associates
Information Not Available
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Comms Service Provider27%
Real Estate/Law Firm18%
Transportation Company9%
Consumer Goods Company9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider41%
Computer Software Company25%
Manufacturing Company4%
Construction Company4%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business46%
Midsize Enterprise17%
Large Enterprise38%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business24%
Midsize Enterprise9%
Large Enterprise67%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Cisco, Barracuda Networks and others in SD-WAN. Updated: November 2020.
447,846 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Cisco SD-WAN is ranked 2nd in SD-WAN with 21 reviews while FatPipe SD-WAN is ranked 19th in SD-WAN. Cisco SD-WAN is rated 7.8, while FatPipe SD-WAN is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Cisco SD-WAN writes "A solution for integrating services to enhance up-time, performance and lower costs". On the other hand, Cisco SD-WAN is most compared with VeloCloud, Fortinet FortiGate, Meraki SD-WAN, Versa FlexVNF and VMware NSX, whereas FatPipe SD-WAN is most compared with VeloCloud and Fortinet FortiGate.

See our list of best SD-WAN vendors and best WAN Edge vendors.

We monitor all SD-WAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.