Compare Cisco Secure Email vs. Kaspersky Security for Mail Server

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Proofpoint, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Email Security. Updated: May 2021.
511,521 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"You're going to get what you pay for. If you're not willing to pay the price of Cisco, you're not going to get a product that's as good as Cisco. I don't think Cisco is overpriced, because for the last two years I've been comparing it to Microsoft and Cisco has been cheaper and given us more features.""In my previous organization, avoiding four instances of CryptoLocker within an estimated six month period is approximately $600,000 in lost time and effort. Our five year cost was about a million dollars, and the four outages that we had equated to 65 percent of that five year cost.""The licensing was all transferred.""Compared to Cisco's on-prem service, the cost is the same, but you don't have to pay for the hardware and you don't have to maintain the system, as far as upgrades and hardware failures are concerned. It is cheaper to operate on their cloud service than it is to operate with their on-prem service.""Cisco Secure Email and the support are priced well. It's not cheap, but there are other solutions that offer less and cost so much. For example, Microsoft is more expensive than Cisco.""There are additional fees for adding features."

More Cisco Secure Email Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Email Security solutions are best for your needs.
511,521 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The malicious URL scanning, as well as the anti-malware features, have been really useful for us in our environment.
Top Answer: With respect to transferring policies and licenses, Smart Licensing has really improved the overall licensing model for Cisco. We've been really happy with Smart Licensing. There are additional fees… more »
Top Answer: The UI is definitely one area of improvement because it doesn't match other interfaces and the navigation can be a little clunky. Generally speaking, it is just dated, and I know that they're working… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
2nd
out of 52 in Email Security
Views
11,131
Comparisons
6,836
Reviews
9
Average Words per Review
1,623
Rating
9.0
26th
out of 52 in Email Security
Views
423
Comparisons
351
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Cisco Email Security, IronPort, Cisco Email Security, ESA, Email Security Appliances
Learn More
Overview

Customers of all sizes face the same daunting challenge: email is simultaneously the most important business communication tool and the leading attack vector for security breaches. Cisco Email Security enables users to communicate securely and helps organizations combat Business Email Compromise (BEC), ransomware, advanced malware, phishing, spam, and data loss with a multilayered approach to security.

Email is the number one vector used by cybercriminals to penetrate and attack enterprise IT systems.

Kaspersky Security for Mail Server uses Next Generation technologies including advanced heuristics, machine learning and sandboxing to detect and protect against ransomware, spam, phishing, data loss and even unknown threats penetrating your IT systems through emails and malicious attachments.

Offer
Learn more about Cisco Secure Email
Learn more about Kaspersky Security for Mail Server
Sample Customers
SUNY Old Westbury, CoxHealth, City of Fullerton, Indra
Vimpel Com, Estrella Galicia, Krombacher
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Energy/Utilities Company21%
Retailer16%
Manufacturing Company11%
Financial Services Firm11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider32%
Computer Software Company21%
Government5%
Financial Services Firm5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider33%
Computer Software Company18%
Educational Organization5%
Energy/Utilities Company5%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business35%
Midsize Enterprise23%
Large Enterprise42%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business5%
Midsize Enterprise29%
Large Enterprise66%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Proofpoint, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Email Security. Updated: May 2021.
511,521 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Cisco Secure Email is ranked 2nd in Email Security with 9 reviews while Kaspersky Security for Mail Server is ranked 26th in Email Security. Cisco Secure Email is rated 9.0, while Kaspersky Security for Mail Server is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Cisco Secure Email writes "Stops the vast majority of email from getting in, across our multiple email domains". On the other hand, Cisco Secure Email is most compared with Fortinet FortiMail, FireEye Email Security, Proofpoint Email Protection, Cisco Secure Email Cloud Mailbox and IRONSCALES, whereas Kaspersky Security for Mail Server is most compared with Fortinet FortiMail, Barracuda Email Security Gateway, Symantec Messaging Gateway, Fortinet FortiMail Cloud and Cyren EmailSecurity.

See our list of best Email Security vendors.

We monitor all Email Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.