We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare Cisco Secure Workload vs. Fortinet FortiCWP

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The price is based on how many computers you're going to install it on."

More Cisco Secure Workload Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Workload Security solutions are best for your needs.
542,721 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Other then providing micro segmentation capabilities the dashboard provides all required information in single windows for configured workload. With insight feature we even get… more »
Top Answer: Support for all OS as currently they do not support AIX which is normally base OS for any critical Banking Workload  Solution should be able to provide micro Segmentation policy based on process… more »
Top Answer: Micro Segmentation is 1 of the important use case which organization go with Cisco ACI for Agentless  They also got Cisco Tetration for Agent based approach 
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
7th
Views
9,311
Comparisons
5,516
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
505
Rating
9.0
21st
Views
486
Comparisons
395
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
Cisco Tetration
FortiCWP
Learn More
Overview

Achieve the security required for today's heterogeneous multicloud environment with Cisco Secure Workload (formerly Tetration). Protect workloads across any cloud, application, and workload--anywhere. Automate and implement a secure zero-trust model for micro-segmentation based on application behavior and telemetry. Proactively detect and remediate indicators of compromise to minimize the impact to your business.

Organizations are embracing multiple public cloud platforms, resulting in increased complexity of management which impacts security and risk. Additionally, the built-in security tools that come with various cloud platforms are unique to each, compounding the challenge of consistently managing risk across all clouds in a multi-cloud world. This challenge renders security operations time consuming and ineffective. As the attack surface expands, organizations need to protect from not only from risks of configuration and management of the application elements themselves, but also from risks originating via cloud application programming interfaces (APIs) and UIs.

FortiCWP offers security administrators and DevOps teams the ability to evaluate their cloud configuration security posture, detect potential threats originating from misconfiguration of cloud resources, analyze traffic across cloud resources (in and out of the cloud), and evaluate cloud configuration against best practices. It enables the ability to manage risk throughout multi-cloud infrastructures, provides regulatory compliance reporting, and integrates remediation into the cloud infrastructure lifecycle automation framework.

Offer
Learn more about Cisco Secure Workload
Learn more about Fortinet FortiCWP
Sample Customers
ADP, University of North Carolina Charlotte (UNCC)
Carvalho, Autodesk, Shipserv, Security7 Networks, Coopenae
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider39%
Computer Software Company20%
Financial Services Firm7%
Insurance Company4%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company34%
Comms Service Provider22%
Manufacturing Company8%
Government6%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business22%
Large Enterprise78%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business2%
Midsize Enterprise15%
Large Enterprise83%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Check Point, Morphisec and others in Cloud Workload Security. Updated: October 2021.
542,721 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Cisco Secure Workload is ranked 7th in Cloud Workload Security with 2 reviews while Fortinet FortiCWP is ranked 21st in Cloud Workload Security. Cisco Secure Workload is rated 8.6, while Fortinet FortiCWP is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Cisco Secure Workload writes "Simple to deploy and provides good application visibility along with micro-segmentation feature". On the other hand, Cisco Secure Workload is most compared with VMware NSX, Guardicore Centra, Illumio Adaptive Security Platform, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks and Edgewise, whereas Fortinet FortiCWP is most compared with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management and Azure Security Center.

See our list of best Cloud Workload Security vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Workload Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.