Cisco Sourcefire 3D [EOL] vs IBM Security Network IPS comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cisco Sourcefire 3D [EOL] and IBM Security Network IPS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Darktrace, Vectra AI, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS).
To learn more, read our detailed Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) solutions are best for your needs.
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer:The solution is quite costly. It's high in comparison to other devices.
Top Answer:Defining the new security rules and policies sometimes becomes a challenge. Integration with other platforms becomes a challenge as well. I'd like to see more integration with other tools and… more »
Ranking
Unranked
In Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
Views
456
Comparisons
359
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
719
Rating
7.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
Sourcefire 3D
Security Network Intrusion Prevention System, IBM Security Network Protection, XGS, GX
Learn More
Overview
The Sourcefire 3D System combines the security of an industry-leading network intrusion protection system with the power to control access to your network based on detected applications, users, and URLs.
IBM Security Network Intrusion Prevention System appliances are designed to stop constantly evolving threats before they impact your business. This means providing both high levels of protection and performance, while lowering the overall cost and complexity associated with deploying and managing a large number of point solutions.
Sample Customers
New South Wales Rural Fire Service
Equifax, Christian Hospital Centre
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm24%
Computer Software Company16%
Manufacturing Company8%
Real Estate/Law Firm6%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business17%
Midsize Enterprise9%
Large Enterprise73%
Buyer's Guide
Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Darktrace, Vectra AI, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS). Updated: March 2024.
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Cisco Sourcefire 3D [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) while IBM Security Network IPS is ranked 24th in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) with 4 reviews. Cisco Sourcefire 3D [EOL] is rated 8.6, while IBM Security Network IPS is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of Cisco Sourcefire 3D [EOL] writes "The dashboard offers stats and alerts. Updates frequently fail and need to be installed manually using CLI". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Security Network IPS writes "User-friendly and has a good blocking feature but is quite expensive". Cisco Sourcefire 3D [EOL] is most compared with , whereas IBM Security Network IPS is most compared with Darktrace, Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention and Cisco Secure Network Analytics.

See our list of best Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) vendors.

We monitor all Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.