Compare Cisco Sourcefire SNORT vs. Kerio Control

Cisco Sourcefire SNORT is ranked 8th in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software with 7 reviews while Kerio Control is ranked 2nd in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software with 11 reviews. Cisco Sourcefire SNORT is rated 8.2, while Kerio Control is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Cisco Sourcefire SNORT writes "Good functionality and has the possibility to have one manager for other firewalls but stability needs to improve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Kerio Control writes "Provides users with the ability to log in to the portal page, keep track of their data usage and perform bandwidth management". Cisco Sourcefire SNORT is most compared with Cisco Stealthwatch, Fortinet FortiWeb and Splunk User Behavior Analytics, whereas Kerio Control is most compared with pfSense, Fortinet FortiGate and Sophos UTM. See our Cisco Sourcefire SNORT vs. Kerio Control report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Sourcefire SNORT vs. Kerio Control and other solutions. Updated: November 2019.
382,196 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
In general, the features are all great. However, if I need to take hardware for ASA, because they need to upgrade to Firepower, we want to create rules. For that, most of the time we go to the command line. Right now Firepower is working really hard on the grid. You can apply all those rules to the grid. Even if you want to monitor the logs, for example, the activity will tell you which particular user has been blocked because of that rule. Firepower's monitoring interface is very good, because you can see each and every piece. ASA also had it, but there you needed to type the command and be under the server to see all that stuff. In Firepower you have the possibility to go directly to the firewall. The way the monitoring is displayed is also very nice. The feature I appreciate most in Firepower is actually the grid. The grid has worked very well.I like most of Cisco's features, like malware detection and URL filtering.The most valuable feature of this solution is the filtering.The solution can be integrated with some network electors like Cisco Stealthwatch, Cisco ISE, and Active Directory to provide the client with authentication certificates.The whole solution is very good, and stable.Cisco technical support is unbeatable. It offers a premium service every time.Solid intrusion detection and prevention that scales easily in very large environments.

Read more »

It prevents people from visiting undesirable sites and ensures that they use the internet for their designated jobs.What I like the most about Kerio is that I can use the software appliance as a solution, so if the hardware fails for any reason then I can quickly replace it with hardware that I have in stock.All of the features of Kerio Control are equally good. Most valuable to us are the firewall rules, the intrusion detection system, and IP address features.The most valuable feature is to provide users with the ability to log in to the portal page, keep track of their data usage and perform bandwidth management.The flexibility of the system, the capacity to provide the right level of security, and the ability to be integrated into different kinds of infrastructures are the most valuable features.The statistic feature enables us to better use bandwidth management. We monitored the use by mobile, type of application, department, and by users. The bandwidth was solid. Our internet speed is optimized for our research.Kerio has improved my organization's security.Technical support is good. They respond right away.

Read more »

Cons
To be frank, the product is not really stable, although they're working on that. Whenever I go to the technical community with an issue, they will usually say that it is not there yet, but the technical team are working on it. The issues are not insolvable. I think they should just keep working on the product to make sure that the product can become very stable. The technical support is great. I appreciate that. We have a lot of communities supporting Firepower now, so you can find help for whatever issue you have.I don't think this solution is a time-based control system, because one cannot filter traffic based on time.If the price is brought down then everybody will be happy.With the next release, I would like to see some PBR, so that you can do the configuration with the features.The customization of the rules can be simplified.The pricing needs to be improved. We have lots of low-budget clients around us. Budget constraints are always a deterrent in our market.Integration with other components — even Cisco's own products — can be enhanced to improve administrative experience.

Read more »

Improvements are needed to the Next Generation Firewall Protection, specifically with user-level protection.Their support is getting better but still needs improvement.Kerio Control has just improved on their biggest problem, which was to introduce better support for high-availability requirements in production.I would like to be able to inspect https packets for the purpose of virus scanning.The improvement that we are looking for is for when decide to move some part of our application to the cloud.I would like for them to add more security features.They should add wireless features.I would like to see them develop a bit more flexibility creating VLANs.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
I don't know the exact amount, but most of the time when I go to a company with a proposition, they will say, "This thing that you are selling is good, but it's expensive. Why don't you propose something like FortiGate, Check Point, or Palo Alto?" Cisco device are expensive compared to other devices.Licensing for this solution is paid on a yearly basis.We have a three-year license for this solution.

Read more »

My advice is to use your own hardware, and do not use theirs.There is a yearly upkeep fee.The pricing is in-line with our expectations in terms of the quality that we get for it.It's very affordable.The price is inexpensive.Pricing is good, but the licensing took a lot of time.Search and compare.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software solutions are best for your needs.
382,196 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
2,203
Comparisons
1,892
Reviews
7
Average Words per Review
519
Avg. Rating
8.1
Views
12,407
Comparisons
9,033
Reviews
11
Average Words per Review
383
Avg. Rating
8.3
Top Comparisons
Compared 41% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Also Known As
Sourcefire SNORT
Learn
Cisco
GFI
Overview

Snort is an open-source, rule-based, intrusion detection and prevention system. It combines the benefits of signature-, protocol-, and anomaly-based inspection methods to deliver flexible protection from malware attacks. Snort gained notoriety for being able to accurately detect threats at high speeds.

Kerio Control brings together next-generation firewall capabilities -- including a network firewall and router, intrusion detection and prevention (IPS), gateway anti-virus, VPN, and web content and application filtering. These comprehensive capabilities and unmatched deployment flexibility make Kerio Control the ideal choice for small and mid-sized businesses.

Offer
Learn more about Cisco Sourcefire SNORT
Learn more about Kerio Control
Sample Customers
CareCore, City of Biel, Dimension Data, LightEdge, Lone Star College System, National Rugby League, Port Aventura, Smart City Networks, Telecom Italia, The Department of Education in Western AustraliaTriton Technical, McDonald's
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider22%
Software R&D Company14%
Healthcare Company13%
Government9%
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Sourcefire SNORT vs. Kerio Control and other solutions. Updated: November 2019.
382,196 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email