Cisco Sourcefire SNORT vs Trend Vision One - Cloud Security comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cisco Sourcefire SNORT and Trend Vision One - Cloud Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Cisco Sourcefire SNORT vs. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security Report (Updated: March 2024).
767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the filtering.""The most valuable feature is the ability to automatically learn the traffic in our environment, and change the merit recommendations based on that.""It has a huge rate of protection. It's has a low level of positives and a huge rate of threat protection. It's easy to deploy and easy to implement. It has an incredible price rate compared to similar solutions.""The most valuable feature is the visibility that we have across the virtual environment.""It is quite an intelligent product.""The solution can be integrated with some network electors like Cisco Stealthwatch, Cisco ISE, and Active Directory to provide the client with authentication certificates.""Solid intrusion detection and prevention that scales easily in very large environments.""Cisco Sourcefire SNORT is easy to configure and the reporting is great. It's also very user-friendly."

More Cisco Sourcefire SNORT Pros →

"The product helps us understand our environment better.""The storage and computing features are valuable.""The stability is quite good.""Virtual patching is one of the key features, which is executed with their IPS.""The most valuable part of Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is its dashboard, as it's simple. It's easy to manage, and you can better control the solution.""I really like Trend Vision One - Cloud Security's dashboard.""Vision One is versatile and can be integrated with many SIEMs. You're not limited to only one SIEM, such as Microsoft Sentinel. The API integrations are seamless, and we have all the documentation needed to integrate Vision One via API.""The perfect package for all security platforms, providing more than any other endpoint solution."

More Trend Vision One - Cloud Security Pros →

Cons
"We are unhappy with technical support for this solution, and it is not as professional as what we typically expect from Cisco.""The customization of the rules can be simplified.""There are problems setting up VPNs for some regions.""Integration with other components — even Cisco's own products — can be enhanced to improve administrative experience.""While the alerts they offer are good, it could improve it in the sense that they should be more detailed to make the alerts more useful to us in general. Sometimes the solution will offer up false positives. Due to the fact that the alerts aren't detailed, we have to go dig around to see why is it being blocked. The solution would be infinitely better if there was just a bit more detail in the alert information and logging we receive.""I would like to have analytics included in the suite.""The main dashboard of Cisco Sourcefire SNORT could improve.""I did not experience any pain points that required improvement. Maybe a couple of false-positives, but that's about it."

More Cisco Sourcefire SNORT Cons →

"The pricing can get high.""The dashboard should be a bit more intuitive.""The workbook insights generate a massive list, making it inconvenient to review.""Trend Vision One - Cloud Security seems to have a preference for AWS Cloud over Azure and would be improved by focusing equally on both.""Trend Vision One - Cloud Security could improve connections with different types of authentication and user groups concerning cloud services.""The initial setup can be complex for the inexperienced.""Documentation on cloud architecture and job architecture would be helpful.""Trend Vision One - Cloud Security should address threats automatically without having user input."

More Trend Vision One - Cloud Security Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "We have a three-year license for this solution."
  • "Licensing for this solution is paid on a yearly basis."
  • "I don't know the exact amount, but most of the time when I go to a company with a proposition, they will say, "This thing that you are selling is good, but it's expensive. Why don't you propose something like FortiGate, Check Point, or Palo Alto?" Cisco device are expensive compared to other devices."
  • "The cost is per port and can be expensive but it does include training and support for three years."
  • More Cisco Sourcefire SNORT Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It's a slightly expensive product."
  • "Pricing for Trend Micro Cloud One Container Security in the corporate market is okay."
  • "The is price is 25% cheaper than it was a couple of years ago, which is good."
  • "The price could be lower. That is a bit of a consideration."
  • "The pricing for Cloud One is reasonable because my costs scale up and down based on my infrastructure usage."
  • "With everything I deal with, Trend Micro Cloud One's pricing is somewhere in the middle."
  • "One year ago, Trend transitioned to a credit system for licensing, which has confused users."
  • More Trend Vision One - Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) solutions are best for your needs.
    767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The product is inexpensive compared to leading brands such as Palo Alto or Fortinet.
    Top Answer:The product is inexpensive compared to leading brands such as Palo Alto or Fortinet. It is cheaper than Palo Alto and comparable to Fortinet. It also depends on Cisco’s discount. Sometimes it's… more »
    Top Answer:The solution has some stability issues. Also, it's complicated compared to other products like FortiGate.
    Top Answer:The the most valuable feature is the scanning engine. It does not impact server performance. It's very lightweight.
    Top Answer:The is price is 25% cheaper than it was a couple of years ago, which is good.
    Top Answer:The local agent should be able to show more logs. At present, the logs are only available from the web console and not from the local agent.
    Ranking
    Views
    2,112
    Comparisons
    1,553
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    392
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    309
    Comparisons
    89
    Reviews
    14
    Average Words per Review
    1,092
    Rating
    8.6
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Sourcefire SNORT
    Trend Micro Cloud One , Cloud One Workload Security, Trend Micro Cloud One Container Security, Trend Micro Cloud One Application Security, Cloud One File Storage Security, Cloud One Network Security, Cloud One Conformity
    Learn More
    Overview

    Snort is an open-source, rule-based, intrusion detection and prevention system. It combines the benefits of signature-, protocol-, and anomaly-based inspection methods to deliver flexible protection from malware attacks. Snort gained notoriety for being able to accurately detect threats at high speeds.

    Trend Vision One- Cloud Security Security provides comprehensive cloud security, threat protection, and compliance monitoring. Users commend its advanced features, ease of use, and strong performance in keeping digital assets safe. The platform improves efficiency and productivity for organizations while offering excellent customer support.

    Sample Customers
    CareCore, City of Biel, Dimension Data, LightEdge, Lone Star College System, National Rugby League, Port Aventura, Smart City Networks, Telecom Italia, The Department of Education in Western Australia
    * **ABN AMRO** * **Accenture** * **Acer** * **Adidas** * **Aetna** * **AIG** * **Air France-KLM** * **Airtel** * **Allianz** * **Amazon** * **American Express** * **Amadeus** * **Aon** * **Apple** * **AT&T** * **Audi** * **Aviva** * **Bank of America** * **Bank of China** * **Bank of Montreal** * **Barclays** * **Bayer** * **Berkshire Hathaway** * **BNP Paribas** * **Boeing** * **BT** * **Cadbury** * **Carrefour** * **Caterpillar** * **Cisco** * **Coca-Cola** * **Comcast** * **ConocoPhillips** * **Credit Suisse** * **Danone** * **Dell** * **Deutsche Bank** * **Disney** * **Eni** * **Ericsson** * **ExxonMobil** * **FedEx** * **Fiat Chrysler** * **Ford** * **Freescale** * **GE** * **Google** * **H&M** * **Honda** * **Honeywell** * **HSBC** * **IBM** * **Intel** * **JPMorgan Chase** * **Kellogg's** * **Konica Minolta** * **L'Oréal** * **LVMH** * **Mastercard** * **McDonald's** * **Merck** * **MetLife** * **Microsoft** * **Mitsubishi** * **Nissan** * **Nike** * **Nokia** * **Oracle** * **Panasonic** * **PepsiCo** * **Philip Morris** * **Prudential** * **Qualcomm** * **Rakuten** * **Renault** * **SAP** * **Samsung** * **Santander** * **Schneider Electric** * **Siemens** * **Sony** * **Spotify** * **Starbucks** * **Tesla** * **Toyota** * **Unilever** * **Visa** * **Vodafone** * **Walmart** * **WeWork** * **Western Digital** * **WPP** * **Xerox** * **Yamaha** * **Zara**
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company27%
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Comms Service Provider18%
    Individual & Family Service9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Government9%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    REVIEWERS
    Government13%
    Retailer13%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Hospitality Company13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization26%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Financial Services Firm6%
    Energy/Utilities Company5%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise39%
    Large Enterprise39%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise63%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business53%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise32%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise35%
    Large Enterprise43%
    Buyer's Guide
    Cisco Sourcefire SNORT vs. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Sourcefire SNORT vs. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Cisco Sourcefire SNORT is ranked 13th in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) with 18 reviews while Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is ranked 9th in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) with 17 reviews. Cisco Sourcefire SNORT is rated 7.6, while Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Cisco Sourcefire SNORT writes "An IPS solution for security and protection but lacks stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Vision One - Cloud Security writes "We can quickly deploy cloud conformity, provides good visibility, and control". Cisco Sourcefire SNORT is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate IPS, Check Point IPS, Cisco NGIPS, Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention and Darktrace, whereas Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Cloud, AWS GuardDuty, Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks and Aqua Cloud Security Platform. See our Cisco Sourcefire SNORT vs. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security report.

    See our list of best Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) vendors.

    We monitor all Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.