Cisco Sourcefire SNORT vs Zscaler Cloud IPS comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Cisco Logo
2,112 views|1,553 comparisons
94% willing to recommend
Zscaler Logo
748 views|536 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cisco Sourcefire SNORT and Zscaler Cloud IPS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Cisco Sourcefire SNORT vs. Zscaler Cloud IPS Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable features of Cisco Sourcefire SNORT are the dashboard for monitoring events.""The most valuable feature is the ability to automatically learn the traffic in our environment, and change the merit recommendations based on that.""The solution can be integrated with some network electors like Cisco Stealthwatch, Cisco ISE, and Active Directory to provide the client with authentication certificates.""The most valuable feature is the visibility that we have across the virtual environment.""The whole solution is very good, and stable.""The most valuable feature of this solution is the filtering.""The product is inexpensive compared to leading brands such as Palo Alto or Fortinet.""I like most of Cisco's features, like malware detection and URL filtering."

More Cisco Sourcefire SNORT Pros →

"The product's most valuable feature is complete SSL inspection.""The initial setup is straightforward and easy in comparison with other solutions.""Cloud IPS integration is seamless, and it uses a Zero Trust model. It also simplifies overall user access management.""The initial setup process is easy.""The best feature is that Zscaler allows for a separation between cloud applications and URL filtering. For example, under the cloud application segment, I can bypass Microsoft Office 365 without the need to add URLs manually. It's one click, so that's handy."

More Zscaler Cloud IPS Pros →

Cons
"I did not experience any pain points that required improvement. Maybe a couple of false-positives, but that's about it.""The initial setup is a little difficult compared to other products in the market. It depends on the environment. If we are doing any migration, it might take months in a brown-field environment.""Integration with other components — even Cisco's own products — can be enhanced to improve administrative experience.""The pricing needs to be improved. We have lots of low-budget clients around us. Budget constraints are always a deterrent in our market.""The implementation could be a bit easier.""With the next release, I would like to see some PBR, so that you can do the configuration with the features.""If the price is brought down then everybody will be happy.""I would like to have analytics included in the suite."

More Cisco Sourcefire SNORT Cons →

"There is always room for improvement.""They have given limited free access for a year. Instead, they should increase the file size and give limited free access for around two months. It will allow engineers to evaluate the product.""We recently had a significant issue with Zscaler. I think they have too many customers and some of their connection edge nodes went down because there were too many requests. I think they aren't scaling enough to keep up with the demand in some areas. That's one thing they should improve.""We encounter issues sharing IP addresses with other companies using the software.""When it comes to scalability, the IPsec could be improved."

More Zscaler Cloud IPS Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "We have a three-year license for this solution."
  • "Licensing for this solution is paid on a yearly basis."
  • "I don't know the exact amount, but most of the time when I go to a company with a proposition, they will say, "This thing that you are selling is good, but it's expensive. Why don't you propose something like FortiGate, Check Point, or Palo Alto?" Cisco device are expensive compared to other devices."
  • "The cost is per port and can be expensive but it does include training and support for three years."
  • More Cisco Sourcefire SNORT Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Zscaler has so far been solely responsible for all the sales we have done with it, so it would be more suited than us to address any issues concerning the pricing."
  • "The software has become more expensive at present."
  • "The product is not affordable for small and medium enterprises."
  • More Zscaler Cloud IPS Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) solutions are best for your needs.
    768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The product is inexpensive compared to leading brands such as Palo Alto or Fortinet.
    Top Answer:The product is inexpensive compared to leading brands such as Palo Alto or Fortinet. It is cheaper than Palo Alto and comparable to Fortinet. It also depends on Cisco’s discount. Sometimes it's… more »
    Top Answer:The solution has some stability issues. Also, it's complicated compared to other products like FortiGate.
    Top Answer:The product's most valuable feature is complete SSL inspection.
    Top Answer:The product is not affordable for small and medium enterprises.
    Top Answer:They have given limited free access for a year. Instead, they should increase the file size and give limited free access for around two months. It will allow engineers to evaluate the product.
    Ranking
    Views
    2,112
    Comparisons
    1,553
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    392
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    748
    Comparisons
    536
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    363
    Rating
    9.3
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Sourcefire SNORT
    Learn More
    Overview

    Snort is an open-source, rule-based, intrusion detection and prevention system. It combines the benefits of signature-, protocol-, and anomaly-based inspection methods to deliver flexible protection from malware attacks. Snort gained notoriety for being able to accurately detect threats at high speeds.

    Zscaler Cloud IPS enables you to have all threat and alert data in one place. Full user, file and app context is available. Streaming to a SIEM allows further integration into the SOC ecosystem.

    The Zscaler Threat Library allows administrators and SOC personnel to drill down on IPS alerts to perform in-depth analysis of threat data within their installation. Search by vulnerability, category or keyword

    For more details: https://www.zscaler.com/produc...

    Sample Customers
    CareCore, City of Biel, Dimension Data, LightEdge, Lone Star College System, National Rugby League, Port Aventura, Smart City Networks, Telecom Italia, The Department of Education in Western Australia
    Zenith Live, Azure, Carlsberg Group
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company27%
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Comms Service Provider18%
    Individual & Family Service9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Government9%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Manufacturing Company14%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Healthcare Company6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise39%
    Large Enterprise39%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise63%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise64%
    Buyer's Guide
    Cisco Sourcefire SNORT vs. Zscaler Cloud IPS
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Sourcefire SNORT vs. Zscaler Cloud IPS and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Cisco Sourcefire SNORT is ranked 13th in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) with 18 reviews while Zscaler Cloud IPS is ranked 20th in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) with 5 reviews. Cisco Sourcefire SNORT is rated 7.6, while Zscaler Cloud IPS is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Cisco Sourcefire SNORT writes "An IPS solution for security and protection but lacks stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zscaler Cloud IPS writes "Stable product with valuable SSL inspection features ". Cisco Sourcefire SNORT is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate IPS, Cisco NGIPS, Check Point IPS, Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention and Darktrace, whereas Zscaler Cloud IPS is most compared with Palo Alto Networks URL Filtering with PAN-DB, Claroty Platform, Darktrace, ExtraHop Reveal(x) and Fortinet FortiGate IPS. See our Cisco Sourcefire SNORT vs. Zscaler Cloud IPS report.

    See our list of best Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) vendors.

    We monitor all Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.