We performed a comparison between Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP and Cisco Secure Network Analytics based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Wiz, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Vulnerability Management."The Compliance engine has helped put our auditors and senior executives at ease, as we can quickly and accurately measure ourselves against hundreds of compliance checks to include CIS benchmarks, PCI, and other best practices."
"The comprehensive security for IaaS and PaaS cloud assets provides efficient security awareness to all the teams."
"The posture management and remediation features are the most valuable. We use GSL Builder to build custom rules in alignment with our organization's policies. CloudGuard has canned rules using multiple standard frameworks, but we also have additional rules."
"The product enables us to check the information that goes out of the company."
"The user interface is responsive and quite intuitive; when selecting an object it automatically shows the relevant actions."
"This platform has allowed us to collect data from multiple sources, centralizing everything under a single source."
"Dome9 wraps our FTP infrastructure with its network security configurations, and this also gives us the ability to monitor FTP activity."
"Helps identify and correct misconfigurations in cloud environments, ensuring that infrastructure and applications are secure and optimized."
"The fact that it can identify down to an IP address of a system that is causing problems, or potentially causing problems, is very valuable."
"The most valuable features of this solution are its reporting and mitigation capabilities."
"The solution allowed us to not only get gain insight but also start collaborating with other tools."
"The feature most valuable for us is to gain visibility of what is actually floating through, so we can stop it based on whether it's good or bad traffic."
"Cisco Stealthwatch has reduced the amount of time to detect an immediate threat."
"It has been pretty stable since we deployed it, and everything seems to be working fine."
"I value the feature which enables me to detect devices talking to suspect IPs."
"The most valuable features of this solution are the logging, keeping threats under control, and keeping our data and environment secure."
"The user interface could be improved. Sometimes, the visibility is not immediately available for the environment. We have the native servers that come with the solutions, but we cannot see them in the Check Point log. Another issue is with the integrated file monitoring. It would make sense to have stuff like file integrity monitoring and malware scanning available within this module because we don't want to integrate another product."
"In general, for the product to be successful, they need to improve security, and configuration detection."
"Reporting should have more options."
"You do need to pay extra in order to get better support."
"The Check Point solution is somewhat expensive."
"Their service needs improvement."
"The support must be more effective."
"The biggest thing is the documentation aspect of Dome9 is a little lacking. They were purchased by Check Point about a year and a half to two years ago. When they integrated into Check Point's support system, a lot of the documentation that they had previously got mangled in the transition, e.g., linking to stuff on the Dome9 website that no longer exists. There are still a lot of spaces with incomplete links and stuff that is not as fully explained as it could be."
"We are continuing down the road of ACI and ISE with Cisco, so we would like to see the continuation of Stealthwatch integrating into ISE for exchange of information, and also, more into the ACI environment too."
"The configuration of the solution was quite complex."
"The ability to be natively integrated into Port Aggregator would be beneficial because it would reduce just one more component that's needed in order to have that type of view."
"Many of these tools require extensive on-premises hardware to run."
"The usability of this solution needs to be improved."
"If they can make this product more web-based, that would be amazing."
"At my company, we might not be using it enough with other applications that we have that can integrate with it."
"It hasn't really improved our direct detection rate but it has definitely reduced our incident response time as we wouldn't have been able to detect threats or immediate risks without this solution."
More Cisco Secure Network Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is ranked 5th in Vulnerability Management with 56 reviews while Cisco Secure Network Analytics is ranked 25th in Network Monitoring Software with 57 reviews. Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is rated 8.4, while Cisco Secure Network Analytics is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP writes "Threat intel integration provides us visibility in case any workload is communicating with suspicious or blacklisted IPs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cisco Secure Network Analytics writes "Increased the visibility of what is happening in our network". Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is most compared with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, AWS GuardDuty, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Wiz and Qualys VMDR, whereas Cisco Secure Network Analytics is most compared with Darktrace, Cisco Secure Cloud Analytics, ThousandEyes, Vectra AI and Arista NDR.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.