We performed a comparison between Cisco Secure Network Analytics and eG Enterprise based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Monitoring Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"It does change the way we troubleshoot and it is relatively easy to use once you learn it. I would recommend it to someone considering it."
"Most valuable features are the network maps and server and network response time."
"The most valuable feature about this solution is that it gives me insight of my network."
"The most valuable feature we got out of Stealthwatch is to be able to, while troubleshooting, go deep into one of our interfaces and verify what the bandwidth is and if there's any activity there that's causing problems."
"It's easy to set up. The deployment takes one or two days. You need to collect the data from a device and then direct it to the portal."
"Using the Cognitive Analytics feature, we have complete visibility that we didn’t have before."
"Able to drill down into a center's utilization, then create reports based on it."
"Most of the engineers I've worked with have been really good. Very knowledgeable and easy to work with."
"EG monitors all infrastructure elements (all OS, all database, storage, network, and web server) from a single console."
"Some of the best features of eG are, in terms of APM, they have complete modules between application performance monitoring, server monitoring, and even storage and network-based monitoring. The UI is also quite good. They have some standard AI-based capabilities, even though it's not quite as advanced when compared to Dynatrace. eG has some good, basic APM capabilities."
"The product is simple to use."
"The ability to see what the end user response is, so I can get a better understanding of what the end user is seeing when they connect to the Citrix servers."
"The GUI is nicer than all the other graphical interfaces out there."
"What I like about eG Enterprise is that it's easy to use. It's a simple product. You can get up to seventy-five to eighty percent of the required information based on real user experience and diagnostics."
"User session details"
"Single pane of glass to review status of the full environment."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"Cisco could improve the administration for the customers."
"The configuration of the solution was quite complex."
"One update I would like to see is an agent-based client. Currently StealthWatch is network based."
"Cisco Stealthwatch needs more integration with device discovery. We have to do a lot of hard work to figure out what things are. Better service integration is required."
"It's a good solid solution but integration with Network Access Control products with Cisco ISE would be good."
"I would like to see a hybrid solution that can work without being connected directly to the internet for those destinations."
"Initially, I felt Cisco Secure Network Analytics lacked integration with Splunk."
"It is time-consuming to set it up and understand how the tool works."
"The solution should improve on the security side and include some more API integrations into wider application platforms."
"In terms of sales or market perspective, they must invest in Latin America with professionals with a more marked presence."
"In terms of areas for improvement in eG Enterprise, we are now moving most of our services to the OpenShift platform, and we need a way to monitor even containerized services or any service deployed on OpenShift, but that feature is still not available in eG Enterprise, so it's not good enough for us."
"Their dashboards could use some improvement. The ability to customize them a bit more."
"Dashboards are difficult to create, and not so useful."
"The solution needs to enhance the management dashboards."
"Needs to improve the networking monitor capabilities."
"The UI looks a little dated and could do with a refresh."
More Cisco Secure Network Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cisco Secure Network Analytics is ranked 25th in Network Monitoring Software with 57 reviews while eG Enterprise is ranked 51st in Network Monitoring Software with 21 reviews. Cisco Secure Network Analytics is rated 8.2, while eG Enterprise is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Cisco Secure Network Analytics writes "Increased the visibility of what is happening in our network". On the other hand, the top reviewer of eG Enterprise writes "Great visibility, easy to set up, and has very responsive technical support". Cisco Secure Network Analytics is most compared with Darktrace, Cisco Secure Cloud Analytics, ThousandEyes, Vectra AI and Arista NDR, whereas eG Enterprise is most compared with Grafana, ControlUp, Zabbix, Dynatrace and AppDynamics. See our Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs. eG Enterprise report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.