We performed a comparison between Cisco Secure Network Analytics and InfoVista VistaInsight based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in Network Monitoring Software."We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"Being able to identify specific date closed across the network is invaluable."
"Cisco Stealthwatch has reduced the amount of time to detect an immediate threat."
"The search options on Cisco Stealthwatch are the most valuable. You can get very granular with it, down to the kilobits or the seconds if you want. The product supports any time frame that you need, so that is nice."
"The most valuable feature is its alerts and dashboard."
"Provides easily identifiable anomalies that you can't see with signature detections."
"Cisco Secure Network Analytics has increased the visibility of what is happening in our network, and I think that's the most important reason to use it. We can see what is really happening instead of just looking at numbers from routers or switches."
"It's a dependable product that is able to pinpoint where we have vulnerabilities if they occur."
"The beginning of any security investigation starts with net flow data."
"My experience with technical support has been perfect."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"We need to be able to filter out internal IPs as non-threats."
"There's a lot of traffic on our network that we don't see sometimes."
"There could be better integration on the programming side, which uses Python. StealthWatch could provide a template for Python to manage the switches. For example, it would be nice if StealthWatch bounced a port automatically it detected something anomalous."
"Its granularity for RBAC roles-based access control needs improvement."
"Stealthwatch needs improvement when it comes to speed."
"Reliance on Java. Get away from that."
"We've run into some issues with the configuration."
"If there was one improvement I’d suggest it would be that it detect traffic through an intranet. The product requires that traffic flow through a managed network device. The product is designed mostly for enterprise environments and not smaller environments or businesses."
"The presentation of the features can be improved. It can be more user-friendly for the visual part of the portal and to allow the customer to be able to use."
More Cisco Secure Network Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Cisco Secure Network Analytics is ranked 24th in Network Monitoring Software with 57 reviews while InfoVista VistaInsight is ranked 96th in Network Monitoring Software. Cisco Secure Network Analytics is rated 8.2, while InfoVista VistaInsight is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Cisco Secure Network Analytics writes "Increased the visibility of what is happening in our network". On the other hand, the top reviewer of InfoVista VistaInsight writes "An excellent product with an expensive license". Cisco Secure Network Analytics is most compared with Darktrace, Cisco Secure Cloud Analytics, ThousandEyes, Vectra AI and Arista NDR, whereas InfoVista VistaInsight is most compared with .
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.