Most Helpful Review
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
The most valuable feature is anomaly detection, where it finds things that are not allowed internally.
Most of the engineers I've worked with have been really good. Very knowledgeable and easy to work with.
Being able to graph and show data to management has improved our organization. We can show the data to the higher-ups. It shows them that it's picking up on these anomalies and doing its job.
It's a dependable product that is able to pinpoint where we have vulnerabilities if they occur.
Using the Cognitive Analytics feature, we have complete visibility that we didn’t have before.
The most valuable feature about this solution is that it gives me insight of my network.
It has improved our internal knowledge of what's going on with the network, and that's helpful.
The most valuable features of this solution are the logging, keeping threats under control, and keeping our data and environment secure.
The initial setup is straightforward.
The analysis engine is a very valuable feature.
What I find most valuable, is that it is easy to use.
The technical support is very good.
he solution's GUI is good.
The solution is very good because it catches a lot of threats in emails.
The most valuable feature is the protection and the way it works, the technology is what I like the most.
The most valuable feature was the EDR, endpoint detection and response.
The usability of this solution needs to be improved.
We've run into some issues with the configuration.
They should include Citrix VDIs in the next release.
The GUI could use some improvement. Being able to find features more easily would be a great improvement if it was simplified.
The initial setup is complex, as there is a lot to configure.
It hasn't really improved our direct detection rate but it has definitely reduced our incident response time as we wouldn't have been able to detect threats or immediate risks without this solution.
I would like to see more and cleaner reporting. For example, if I pull up Steven and I want to look and maybe compare him to what you've done in the past week, and compare that to the past six months, the point would be to see what the difference in activity looks like over this time. I don't see that capability in reporting to date. You see that trend but you don't really see a straightforward comparison. That right there is key to what we want to see about the normal activity.
It is time-consuming to set it up and understand how the tool works.
The integration is limited. The solution needs to offer better integration with multiple vendors.
Product could include a user interface and be made simpler for customers to configure.
Something that needs to improve, is the end-point protection.
Most people are confused about how to use the right integration of the right Fortinet product.
At least once a week we have a false alarm. This needs to be adjusted so that we get fewer of these occurrences.
The response time from technical support should be improved.
The licensing can be very confusing. It needs to be simplified.
In the next release, I would like to see machine learning and anti-exploitation included.
Pricing and Cost Advice
Our fees are approximately $3,000 USD.
Licensing is on a yearly basis.
We pay for support costs on a yearly basis.
On a yearly basis, licensing is somewhere around $30,000.
The yearly licensing cost is about $50,000.
The pricing for this solution is good.
The licensing costs are outrageous.
Today, we are part of the big Cisco ELA, and it is a la carte. We can get orders for whatever we want. At the end of the day, we have to pay for it in one big expense, but that is fine. We are okay with that.
The solution is not expensive at all.
There are additional costs, which isn't included in the licensing fee.
There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees.
out of 45 in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software
Average Words per Review
out of 25 in Advanced Threat Protection
Average Words per Review
Compared 24% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Compared 30% of the time.
Compared 20% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
Also Known As
|Cisco Stealthwatch Enterprise, Lancope StealthWatch|
Cisco Stealthwatch uses NetFlow to provide visibility across the network, data center, branch offices, and cloud. Its advanced security analytics uncover stealthy attacks on the extended network. Stealthwatch helps you use your existing network as a security sensor and enforcer to dramatically improve your threat defense.
Today’s threats are increasingly sophisticated and often bypass traditional malware security by masking their malicious activity. A sandbox augments your security architecture by validating threats in a separate, secure environment. FortiSandbox offers a powerful combination of advanced detection, automated mitigation, actionable insight, and flexible deployment to stop targeted attacks and subsequent data loss. It's also a key component of our Advanced Threat Protection solution.
Learn more about Cisco Stealthwatch
Learn more about Fortinet FortiSandbox
|Edge Web Hosting, Telenor Norway, Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana, Webster Financial Corporation, Westinghouse Electric, VMware, TIAA-CREF||Lush, Barnabas Health, Options, Riverside Healthcare, Hillsbourough County Schools, Columbia Public Schools, Schiller AG|
Financial Services Firm11%
Comms Service Provider25%
Software R&D Company14%
No Data Available
See also Cisco Stealthwatch Reviews, Fortinet FortiSandbox Reviews, and our list of Best Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software Companies.