Compare Cisco Stealthwatch vs. Statseeker

Cisco Stealthwatch is ranked 1st in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software with 39 reviews while Statseeker is ranked 9th in Network Monitoring Software with 31 reviews. Cisco Stealthwatch is rated 8.0, while Statseeker is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Cisco Stealthwatch writes "You are able to drill down into a center's utilization, then create reports based on it". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Statseeker writes "Key for me is that it doesn't aggregate the information up; I can look at detailed information going back quite a long time". Cisco Stealthwatch is most compared with Darktrace, Splunk User Behavior Analytics and Cisco Stealthwatch Cloud, whereas Statseeker is most compared with SolarWinds NPM, Nagios XI and ManageEngine OpManager. See our Cisco Stealthwatch vs. Statseeker report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Cisco Stealthwatch Logo
22,916 views|13,913 comparisons
Statseeker Logo
2,342 views|835 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Stealthwatch vs. Statseeker and other solutions. Updated: March 2019.
371,639 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The most valuable feature is anomaly detection, where it finds things that are not allowed internally.Most of the engineers I've worked with have been really good. Very knowledgeable and easy to work with.Being able to graph and show data to management has improved our organization. We can show the data to the higher-ups. It shows them that it's picking up on these anomalies and doing its job.It's a dependable product that is able to pinpoint where we have vulnerabilities if they occur.Using the Cognitive Analytics feature, we have complete visibility that we didn’t have before.The most valuable feature about this solution is that it gives me insight of my network.It has improved our internal knowledge of what's going on with the network, and that's helpful.The most valuable features of this solution are the logging, keeping threats under control, and keeping our data and environment secure.

Read more »

Device grouping is very easy, and you can discover thousands of devices in a few minutes.The solution reduces the complexity of our network monitoring because it can make my engineers do their jobs faster. The solution also reduces troubleshooting time for network administrators to pinpoint issues quicker.I like the fact that I can aggregate multiple interfaces into a single graph. It allows me to quickly the summary of traffic for multiple devices which is helpful.The most valuable feature is alerting.The most valuable features are scalability and reliability.We're able to recover more expensive ports on our access line devices.It is fairly simple and easy to use as an all-purpose network monitor.The product simplifies monitoring by providing real-time alerts through a GUI dashboard, email and texts.

Read more »

Cons
The usability of this solution needs to be improved.We've run into some issues with the configuration.They should include Citrix VDIs in the next release.The GUI could use some improvement. Being able to find features more easily would be a great improvement if it was simplified.The initial setup is complex, as there is a lot to configure.It hasn't really improved our direct detection rate but it has definitely reduced our incident response time as we wouldn't have been able to detect threats or immediate risks without this solution.I would like to see more and cleaner reporting. For example, if I pull up Steven and I want to look and maybe compare him to what you've done in the past week, and compare that to the past six months, the point would be to see what the difference in activity looks like over this time. I don't see that capability in reporting to date. You see that trend but you don't really see a straightforward comparison. That right there is key to what we want to see about the normal activity.It is time-consuming to set it up and understand how the tool works.

Read more »

The inclusion of configuration management features and SIP links would improve this solution.There is a little bit of room to improve in the alerting section to give some more options there. It's all I can think of right now off the top of my head.That user interface for selecting things needs to be a little more intuitive.It would be nice if they had twenty-four-hour technical support because we contact Australia and we have to wait for them to open.Technical support for this solution is bad, as is everything with Cisco support.If it had more detailed NetFlow information then it would be far better.The interface could be more user-friendly and it would be nice if there were enhanced options for reporting.It doesn't do absolutely everything and it will require some additional software or hardware support to be a complete single solution.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Our fees are approximately $3,000 USD.Licensing is on a yearly basis.We pay for support costs on a yearly basis.On a yearly basis, licensing is somewhere around $30,000.The yearly licensing cost is about $50,000.The pricing for this solution is good.The licensing costs are outrageous.Today, we are part of the big Cisco ELA, and it is a la carte. We can get orders for whatever we want. At the end of the day, we have to pay for it in one big expense, but that is fine. We are okay with that.

Read more »

The licensing cost is yearly and it's $5,000 to $8,000, I think.Statseeker is pretty cheap.This tool would probably be priced well if it had deeper NetFlow capabilities, but for our use case, in particular, we're only recovering ports after ninety days and looking at circuit congestion, it's pretty pricey.The yearly cost varies as per the number of devices being monitored. The cost for 25,000 devices is about $4500.We pay somewhere between $5,000 and $8,000 yearly in licensing fees.When it came to selecting this solution, it came down to cost.Compared to other solutions such as Zabbix and AKiPS, this solution is very well priced.We pay a yearly maintenance fee of approximately $40,000 USD.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software solutions are best for your needs.
371,639 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
22,916
Comparisons
13,913
Reviews
39
Average Words per Review
527
Avg. Rating
8.1
Views
2,342
Comparisons
835
Reviews
31
Average Words per Review
502
Avg. Rating
8.2
Top Comparisons
Compared 23% of the time.
Compared 43% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Also Known As
Cisco Stealthwatch Enterprise, Lancope StealthWatch
Learn
Cisco
Statseeker
Overview

Cisco Stealthwatch uses NetFlow to provide visibility across the network, data center, branch offices, and cloud. Its advanced security analytics uncover stealthy attacks on the extended network. Stealthwatch helps you use your existing network as a security sensor and enforcer to dramatically improve your threat defense.

Statseeker is the only network performance monitoring technology to seamlessly and successfully combine speed + scale + value. Statseeker is a global provider delivering innovative network monitoring solutions for the IT enterprise and OT industrial market space. With active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Instant visibility: Installed in minutes, polls up to 1 million ports from a single server… reduce your time to repair. Powerful monitoring: Checks every port over entire network, every 60 seconds… low network consumption bandwidth. Fast reporting: Practical real-time dashboard, reports in seconds, instant alerts… maximize your up-time. Smart data: 100% network data, original granularity, never rolled up, never averaged… tune for peak performance, control CAPEX and OPEX.
Offer
Learn more about Cisco Stealthwatch
Learn more about Statseeker
Sample Customers
Edge Web Hosting, Telenor Norway, Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana, Webster Financial Corporation, Westinghouse Electric, VMware, TIAA-CREFWith active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Some example customers include: FedEx, Optus, Verizon, California State University, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Monash University, Texas A&M University.
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Healthcare Company26%
Financial Services Firm11%
Manufacturing Company9%
Retailer6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider20%
Software R&D Company14%
Government8%
Media Company7%
REVIEWERS
Healthcare Company32%
University15%
Comms Service Provider12%
Government9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider28%
Aerospace/Defense Firm20%
Software R&D Company18%
Media Company6%
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Stealthwatch vs. Statseeker and other solutions. Updated: March 2019.
371,639 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email