Most Helpful Review
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
The solution's analytics and thrust detection capabilities are good. We're still adjusting it. It's a little hypersensitive, but it is working right now.
The feature most valuable for us is to gain visibility of what is actually floating through, so we can stop it based on whether it's good or bad traffic.
It is a good application, providing for real-time monitoring of the organization of data. It can basically identify points of peak traffic where possible issues are being caused.
The most valuable feature is its alerts and dashboard.
The most valuable part is that Stealthwatch is part of a portfolio of security devices from Cisco. Cisco literally can touch every single end point, every single ingress and egress point in the network. Nobody else has that.
The solution has increased our threat detection rate. Cisco Stealthwatch has not reduced our incident response times. It has not reduced the amount of time it takes us to detect immediate threats. It has reduced false positives.
The search options on Cisco Stealthwatch are the most valuable. You can get very granular with it, down to the kilobits or the seconds if you want. The product supports any time frame that you need, so that is nice.
Cisco Stealthwatch has reduced the amount of time to detect an immediate threat.
The first of the valuable features is how easy it is to access all of the information that's gathered from the assessments... With a lot of other technologies, like Rapid7, if you're using Nexpose you effectively have to be a DBA to get some of the lower-level results from the scans. And Qualys wasn't very intuitive.
The next big one is supportability. In a large enterprise, we have many types of technologies. The technology we previously had didn't even support authentication to a lot of those technologies.
The scanning itself is really the core of the tool, and it's what we're most interested in.
Cisco Stealthwatch needs more integration with device discovery. We have to do a lot of hard work to figure out what things are. Better service integration is required.
The initial setup was complex.
At my company, we might not be using it enough with other applications that we have that can integrate with it.
It's too complicated to install, when starting out.
I would like Cisco to make it easier for the administrators to use it.
The ability to be natively integrated into Port Aggregator would be beneficial because it would reduce just one more component that's needed in order to have that type of view.
I would like the search page available with Cisco Stealthwatch to be more intuitive. The previous release was better than the current one for the UI.
There's a lot of traffic on our network that we don't see sometimes.
When it comes to... dynamic application scanning, I think they are lagging behind the curve. They have a lackluster solution, to the point where I think they need to determine, as a company, whether or not that's a space they even want to play in.
There are certain circumstances where they may have found a vulnerable service and they just removed the service completely from the device because nobody was using it. There's no way to go into SecurityCenter and mark it, to say, "This is no longer an issue. It doesn't exist anymore." Or, "The risk was accepted for one year, so let's not report it as 'high' until that one year period is done." The handling of operational flow around vulnerability management could be improved.
Pricing and Cost Advice
Today, we are part of the big Cisco ELA, and it is a la carte. We can get orders for whatever we want. At the end of the day, we have to pay for it in one big expense, but that is fine. We are okay with that.
NetFlow is very expensive.
One of the things which bugs me about Lancope is the licensing. We understand how licensing works. Our problem is when we bought and purchased most of these Lancope devices, we did so with our sister company. Somewhere within the purchase and distribution, licensing got mixed up. That is all on Cisco, and it is their responsibility. They allotted some of our sister company's equipment to us, and some of our equipment to them. To date, they have never been able to fix it.
Licensing is done by flows per second, not including outside (in traffic).
Pricing is much higher compared to other solutions.
Licensing is done by flows per second, not including outside>in traffic.
We did a three-year deal where the cost is amortized over the three years. The Elite Support was an additional cost to the standard licensing fees... If you use Security Center, most of the time it is on-premise, so you're going to have some sort of infrastructure to build out and there's going to be a cost associated with that.
out of 41 in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software
Average Words per Review
out of 94 in Network Monitoring Software
Average Words per Review
Compared 24% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Compared 38% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Also Known As
|Cisco Stealthwatch Enterprise, Lancope StealthWatch||SecurityCenter Continuous View, SecurityCenter CV|
|Cisco||Tenable Network Security|
Cisco Stealthwatch uses NetFlow to provide visibility across the network, data center, branch offices, and cloud. Its advanced security analytics uncover stealthy attacks on the extended network. Stealthwatch helps you use your existing network as a security sensor and enforcer to dramatically improve your threat defense.
SecurityCenter Continuous View is the market-leading continuous network monitoring platform. It integrates SecurityCenter along with multiple Nessus Network Monitor sensors and Log Correlation Engine (LCE) to provide comprehensive continuous network monitoring.
Learn more about Cisco Stealthwatch
Learn more about Tenable SecurityCenter Continuous View
|Edge Web Hosting, Telenor Norway, Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana, Webster Financial Corporation, Westinghouse Electric, VMware, TIAA-CREF||Methodist Healthcare Ministries|
Financial Services Firm12%
Comms Service Provider6%
Financial Services Firm18%
Comms Service Provider11%
No Data Available