Compare Cisco TelePresence vs. GoToMeeting

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Cisco TelePresence Logo
1,334 views|953 comparisons
GoToMeeting Logo
2,599 views|1,938 comparisons
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The SpeakerTrack feature is the most valuable feature."

More Cisco TelePresence Pros »

"The key advantage of GoToMeeting is the ability to use it without installing anything.""Even for somebody who does not have a lot of experience, they can easily use it.""It's cost-effective.""GoToMeeting is very handy. It's good software. I would definitely recommend it.""The most valuable feature is the dial-in capability.""The most important feature for me was the iPhone app.""Screenshare is the most valuable feature as well as the number of meeting participants possible in a meeting. It also has good quality.""I like GoToMeeting because it is lighter than other solutions, such as Webex."

More GoToMeeting Pros »

Cons
"I was in touch with one of our clients and they mentioned that they would like to have a holographic video conferencing. It would be great if that feature would be added."

More Cisco TelePresence Cons »

"The enrolment for a non-IT user should be easier. It should be simplified for non-IT users.""It is not so stable.""The newer user interface takes a bit longer to get used to.""In addition to the features it already has, I think GoToMeeting should also have additional features that are not present at the moment.""Manageability needs to be improved.""GoToMeeting is too slow, which is why we no longer use it.""The sound quality is good but the video quality needs improvement.""The interface is a little outdated and could be better."

More GoToMeeting Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"It is a little expensive although now, with the competition from Zoom and other products, they have lowered their prices and it is better.""GoToMeeting is a little bit expensive compared to other products."

More GoToMeeting Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Virtual Meetings solutions are best for your needs.
509,641 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: GoToMeeting's security is very good. I've never known anybody to crash a GoToMeeting.
Top Answer: You can get free subscriptions. I have a paid subscription. The CEO has a paid subscription, but we can't afford to buy GoTomeeting for every person. They get the free ones instead. There's some… more »
Top Answer: The new version crashes my ISP. I don't like the new version. I hope they continue to support the Classic version. I didn't like the fact that LogMeIn tried to make their new version look like Zoom… more »
Ranking
20th
out of 59 in Virtual Meetings
Views
1,334
Comparisons
953
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
389
Rating
N/A
5th
out of 59 in Virtual Meetings
Views
2,599
Comparisons
1,938
Reviews
12
Average Words per Review
434
Rating
8.1
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
TelePresence
Learn More
Overview
Cisco TelePresence Server brings multiparty video to unified communications deployments. Its flexible video, audio, and content-sharing capabilities allow users to participate in video conferences with multiple parties. Users can easily create, launch, and join meetings using standards-based video endpoints. Or their mobile devices or Cisco WebEx clients. Or even third-party video endpoints. The server provides high-quality, standards-based video conferencing for mobile, desktop, and room systems.

GoToMeeting web conferencing software makes it simple and cost-effective to collaborate online with colleagues and customers. Best of all, meeting participants can share their webcams in high definition, so you can enjoy more personal interactions _ without needing a complicated setup.

Offer
Learn more about Cisco TelePresence
Learn more about GoToMeeting
Sample Customers
Afni, AGCO, Bellevue, Came Group, Children's Hospital of Orange County (CHOC Children's), Del Papa Distributing, Instituto Zaldivar, ING Bank, Moffitt Cancer Center, Park Nicollet, Pentana Solutions Australia, San Jose State University, Sub-Zero Wolf, Transwestern and Metropolis Investment Holdings, Vital Images
AAPT, ACD Groupe, Addison Fire, Avigilon Corporation, Basic Industries Ltd., Bitdefender, Branson School Online, Budd Van Lines, Business Fitness, Business Wire
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider35%
Computer Software Company15%
Government11%
Manufacturing Company6%
REVIEWERS
Computer Software Company33%
Financial Services Firm22%
Construction Company11%
Legal Firm11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider19%
Computer Software Company19%
Educational Organization9%
Non Profit8%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business80%
Midsize Enterprise13%
Large Enterprise7%
Find out what your peers are saying about TeamViewer, Zoom Video Communications, Cisco and others in Virtual Meetings. Updated: June 2021.
509,641 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Cisco TelePresence is ranked 20th in Virtual Meetings with 1 review while GoToMeeting is ranked 5th in Virtual Meetings with 12 reviews. Cisco TelePresence is rated 0.0, while GoToMeeting is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Cisco TelePresence writes "The equipment is easy to handle and it simple to use". On the other hand, the top reviewer of GoToMeeting writes "A straightforward setup with good stability and decent pricing". Cisco TelePresence is most compared with Polycom RealPresence Clariti, Webex, Cisco Meeting Server, Zoom and LifeSize, whereas GoToMeeting is most compared with Skype for Business, TeamViewer, Webex, 3CX and Office 365.

See our list of best Virtual Meetings vendors.

We monitor all Virtual Meetings reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.