Cisco TelePresence vs IBM Cloud Video comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Cisco Logo
1,047 views|589 comparisons
83% willing to recommend
IBM Logo
54 views|31 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cisco TelePresence and IBM Cloud Video based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Zoom Video Communications, Cisco, TeamViewer and others in Virtual Meetings.
To learn more, read our detailed Virtual Meetings Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"PresenterTrack cameras improve the meeting experience.""Telepresence's most valuable feature is keeping highly paid employees, such as executives, on the ground instead of wasting time flying around the world. So if you have the right telepresence plan and form, it's not just the video cameras and the systems behind them, it's the way you lay out your meeting room.You can have multiple offices interconnecting in a single meeting, and it looks like everybody's in the same big conference room together because the telepresence yields such a fantastic amount of clarity.""The most valuable features of Cisco TelePresence are the basic standard features and the ease of use. Additionally, the configuration and integration are exemplary.""TelePresence allows our customers to have a quick meeting while traveling and still be effective. It saves time and money.""It was stable. So, I would rate the stability a ten out of ten.""The SpeakerTrack feature is the most valuable feature.""We have a dual screen option to enable video and content sharing.""The configuration is a valuable."

More Cisco TelePresence Pros →

"I like the user interface. There aren't too many buttons that the audience will have to fiddle with."

More IBM Cloud Video Pros →

Cons
"I was in touch with one of our clients and they mentioned that they would like to have a holographic video conferencing. It would be great if that feature would be added.""The tool is expensive.""I would rate my experience with the initial setup a three out of ten, with ten being expensive. It was complex with badges and certificates. Too crazy.""The price of Cisco TelePresence overall should be reduced.""The calling features can be improved.""MX800 comes only with one available DVI port. A few more HDMI ports will improve the system's capability."

More Cisco TelePresence Cons →

"They should improve the registration gateway. Currently, you can't do a pre-event registration that's straightforward. You have to do an API to integrate. It would be a lot easier if they had that."

More IBM Cloud Video Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Cisco TelePresence license is expensive and should be reduced. There is only a cost for the license and it is annually."
  • "I will rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten."
  • "The pricing is expensive, therefore I rate it an eight out of ten."
  • "We used high definition, 1080p, but again, it required license purchases. For example, with three licenses (TP licenses), each allowing one 1080p screen, if I had six participants, I'd need to lower the resolution to 720p or lower to accommodate more participants. More licenses meant more cost."
  • More Cisco TelePresence Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Virtual Meetings solutions are best for your needs.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:It was stable. So, I would rate the stability a ten out of ten.
    Top Answer:There can be some features to enhance the collaboration. For example, with 50 participants using physical devices, some might want to join from other software like Teams, Link, or Skype. That wasn't… more »
    Top Answer:Overall, I would rate the solution a seven out of ten.
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    9th
    out of 63 in Virtual Meetings
    Views
    1,047
    Comparisons
    589
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    340
    Rating
    7.6
    46th
    out of 63 in Virtual Meetings
    Views
    54
    Comparisons
    31
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    TelePresence
    IBM Ustream
    Learn More
    Overview
    Cisco TelePresence Server brings multiparty video to unified communications deployments. Its flexible video, audio, and content-sharing capabilities allow users to participate in video conferences with multiple parties. Users can easily create, launch, and join meetings using standards-based video endpoints. Or their mobile devices or Cisco WebEx clients. Or even third-party video endpoints. The server provides high-quality, standards-based video conferencing for mobile, desktop, and room systems.
    With cognitive and AI infused technologies, IBM Cloud Video empowers customers to enhance live and on-demand video opportunities, and maximize viewer engagement.
    Sample Customers
    Afni, AGCO, Bellevue, Came Group, Children's Hospital of Orange County (CHOC Children's), Del Papa Distributing, Instituto Zaldivar, ING Bank, Moffitt Cancer Center, Park Nicollet, Pentana Solutions Australia, San Jose State University, Sub-Zero Wolf, Transwestern and Metropolis Investment Holdings, Vital Images
    Airbnb, N3 Results, University of Notre Dame
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company12%
    Government11%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    University9%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise29%
    Large Enterprise43%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise68%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Virtual Meetings
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Zoom Video Communications, Cisco, TeamViewer and others in Virtual Meetings. Updated: April 2024.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Cisco TelePresence is ranked 9th in Virtual Meetings with 7 reviews while IBM Cloud Video is ranked 46th in Virtual Meetings. Cisco TelePresence is rated 8.0, while IBM Cloud Video is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Cisco TelePresence writes "A scalable solution that needs some improvement in pricing and stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Cloud Video writes "Great user interface and easy to implement". Cisco TelePresence is most compared with Zoom, Webex, Polycom RealPresence Clariti and Cisco Meeting Server, whereas IBM Cloud Video is most compared with .

    See our list of best Virtual Meetings vendors.

    We monitor all Virtual Meetings reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.