Compare Cisco TelePresence vs. IBM Cloud Video

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Cisco TelePresence? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about TeamViewer, Zoom Video Communications, Microsoft and others in Virtual Meetings. Updated: August 2020.
437,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The SpeakerTrack feature is the most valuable feature.

More Cisco TelePresence Pros »

I like the user interface. There aren't too many buttons that the audience will have to fiddle with.

More IBM Cloud Video Pros »

Cons
I was in touch with one of our clients and they mentioned that they would like to have a holographic video conferencing. It would be great if that feature would be added.

More Cisco TelePresence Cons »

They should improve the registration gateway. Currently, you can't do a pre-event registration that's straightforward. You have to do an API to integrate. It would be a lot easier if they had that.

More IBM Cloud Video Cons »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Virtual Meetings solutions are best for your needs.
437,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The SpeakerTrack feature is the most valuable feature.
Top Answer: I was in touch with one of our clients and they mentioned that they would like to have a holographic video conferencing. It would be great if that feature would be added.
Top Answer: It is quite easy and quite a simple product to use and start with. Anyone dealing with any telepresence equipment will definitely get to know it and it will be better for them to understand. I would… more »
Top Answer: I like the user interface. There aren't too many buttons that the audience will have to fiddle with.
Top Answer: The pricing is affordable and pricing tiers are very straightforward.
Top Answer: IBM Video Streaming can look into enhancing the registration gateway for the ease of less technical customers who may not know how to integrate the APIs.
Ranking
21st
out of 63 in Virtual Meetings
Views
1,398
Comparisons
1,038
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
389
Avg. Rating
N/A
16th
out of 63 in Virtual Meetings
Views
128
Comparisons
94
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
460
Avg. Rating
8.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 100% of the time.
Also Known As
TelePresenceIBM Ustream
Learn
Cisco
IBM
Overview
Cisco TelePresence Server brings multiparty video to unified communications deployments. Its flexible video, audio, and content-sharing capabilities allow users to participate in video conferences with multiple parties. Users can easily create, launch, and join meetings using standards-based video endpoints. Or their mobile devices or Cisco WebEx clients. Or even third-party video endpoints. The server provides high-quality, standards-based video conferencing for mobile, desktop, and room systems.With cognitive and AI infused technologies, IBM Cloud Video empowers customers to enhance live and on-demand video opportunities, and maximize viewer engagement.
Offer
Learn more about Cisco TelePresence
Learn more about IBM Cloud Video
Sample Customers
Afni, AGCO, Bellevue, Came Group, Children's Hospital of Orange County (CHOC Children's), Del Papa Distributing, Instituto Zaldivar, ING Bank, Moffitt Cancer Center, Park Nicollet, Pentana Solutions Australia, San Jose State University, Sub-Zero Wolf, Transwestern and Metropolis Investment Holdings, Vital ImagesAirbnb, N3 Results, University of Notre Dame
Find out what your peers are saying about TeamViewer, Zoom Video Communications, Microsoft and others in Virtual Meetings. Updated: August 2020.
437,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Cisco TelePresence is ranked 21st in Virtual Meetings with 1 review while IBM Cloud Video is ranked 16th in Virtual Meetings with 1 review. Cisco TelePresence is rated 0.0, while IBM Cloud Video is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Cisco TelePresence writes "The equipment is easy to handle and it simple to use". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Cloud Video writes "Great user interface and easy to implement". Cisco TelePresence is most compared with Cisco Meeting Server, Polycom RealPresence Clariti, LifeSize, Webex and BlueJeans Meetings, whereas IBM Cloud Video is most compared with StackPath CDN.

See our list of best Virtual Meetings vendors.

We monitor all Virtual Meetings reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.