Compare Cisco TelePresence vs. UberConference

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Find out what your peers are saying about TeamViewer, Zoom Video Communications, Microsoft and others in Virtual Meetings. Updated: August 2020.
438,944 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Virtual Meetings solutions are best for your needs.
438,944 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The SpeakerTrack feature is the most valuable feature.
Top Answer: I was in touch with one of our clients and they mentioned that they would like to have a holographic video conferencing. It would be great if that feature would be added.
Top Answer: It is quite easy and quite a simple product to use and start with. Anyone dealing with any telepresence equipment will definitely get to know it and it will be better for them to understand. I would… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
21st
out of 63 in Virtual Meetings
Views
1,398
Comparisons
1,038
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
389
Avg. Rating
N/A
55th
out of 63 in Virtual Meetings
Views
6
Comparisons
5
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Also Known As
TelePresence
Learn
Cisco
Dialpad
Overview
Cisco TelePresence Server brings multiparty video to unified communications deployments. Its flexible video, audio, and content-sharing capabilities allow users to participate in video conferences with multiple parties. Users can easily create, launch, and join meetings using standards-based video endpoints. Or their mobile devices or Cisco WebEx clients. Or even third-party video endpoints. The server provides high-quality, standards-based video conferencing for mobile, desktop, and room systems.

UberConference has a scalable and reasonable price for all possible customers. By using UberConference you get the access to unlimited calling, screen sharing, international calling, HD audio, using your number, and other powerful conferencing tools.

Offer
Learn more about Cisco TelePresence
Learn more about UberConference
Sample Customers
Afni, AGCO, Bellevue, Came Group, Children's Hospital of Orange County (CHOC Children's), Del Papa Distributing, Instituto Zaldivar, ING Bank, Moffitt Cancer Center, Park Nicollet, Pentana Solutions Australia, San Jose State University, Sub-Zero Wolf, Transwestern and Metropolis Investment Holdings, Vital ImagesDOMO, Netflix, fitbit, The New York Times
Find out what your peers are saying about TeamViewer, Zoom Video Communications, Microsoft and others in Virtual Meetings. Updated: August 2020.
438,944 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Cisco TelePresence is ranked 21st in Virtual Meetings with 1 review while UberConference is ranked 55th in Virtual Meetings. Cisco TelePresence is rated 0.0, while UberConference is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Cisco TelePresence writes "The equipment is easy to handle and it simple to use". On the other hand, Cisco TelePresence is most compared with Cisco Meeting Server, Polycom RealPresence Clariti, LifeSize, Webex and BlueJeans Meetings, whereas UberConference is most compared with .

See our list of best Virtual Meetings vendors.

We monitor all Virtual Meetings reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.