Compare Cisco Tetration vs. Fortinet FortiCWP

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Cisco Tetration Logo
9,228 views|5,426 comparisons
Fortinet FortiCWP Logo
48 views|34 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use Fortinet FortiCWP? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Check Point, Cisco and others in Cloud Workload Security. Updated: October 2020.
441,850 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The pricing is a bit higher than we anticipated.""The price is outrageous. If you have money to throw at the product, then do it.""Pricing depends on the scope of the application and the features. Larger installations save more.""It is not cheap and pricing may limit scalability.""The price is based on how many computers you're going to install it on."

More Cisco Tetration Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Workload Security solutions are best for your needs.
441,850 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The most valuable feature is micro-segmentation, which is the most important with respect to visibility.
Top Answer: The price is based on how many installation of software sensors you're going to install it on.
Top Answer: There is some overlap between Cisco Tetration and AppDynamics and there are few DC tools, It would be great to have a single pane of glass, rather than have to jump between different tools.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
3rd
Views
9,228
Comparisons
5,426
Reviews
8
Average Words per Review
462
Avg. Rating
8.6
19th
Views
48
Comparisons
34
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Compared 30% of the time.
Compared 24% of the time.
Also Known As
FortiCWP
Learn
Cisco
Fortinet
Overview

Cisco Tetration offers holistic workload protection for multicloud data centers by enabling a zero-trust model using segmentation. This approach allows you to identify security incidents faster, contain lateral movement and reduce your attack surface. Its infrastructure-agnostic approach supports both on-premises and public cloud workloads.

Organizations are embracing multiple public cloud platforms, resulting in increased complexity of management which impacts security and risk. Additionally, the built-in security tools that come with various cloud platforms are unique to each, compounding the challenge of consistently managing risk across all clouds in a multi-cloud world. This challenge renders security operations time consuming and ineffective. As the attack surface expands, organizations need to protect from not only from risks of configuration and management of the application elements themselves, but also from risks originating via cloud application programming interfaces (APIs) and UIs.

FortiCWP offers security administrators and DevOps teams the ability to evaluate their cloud configuration security posture, detect potential threats originating from misconfiguration of cloud resources, analyze traffic across cloud resources (in and out of the cloud), and evaluate cloud configuration against best practices. It enables the ability to manage risk throughout multi-cloud infrastructures, provides regulatory compliance reporting, and integrates remediation into the cloud infrastructure lifecycle automation framework.

Offer
Learn more about Cisco Tetration
Learn more about Fortinet FortiCWP
Sample Customers
ADP, University of North Carolina Charlotte (UNCC)Carvalho, Autodesk, Shipserv, Security7 Networks, Coopenae
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider37%
Computer Software Company27%
Insurance Company4%
Retailer3%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business22%
Large Enterprise78%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business2%
Midsize Enterprise12%
Large Enterprise87%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Check Point, Cisco and others in Cloud Workload Security. Updated: October 2020.
441,850 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Cisco Tetration is ranked 3rd in Cloud Workload Security with 9 reviews while Fortinet FortiCWP is ranked 19th in Cloud Workload Security. Cisco Tetration is rated 8.6, while Fortinet FortiCWP is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Cisco Tetration writes "Saves time, resists attacks, and allocates resources properly". On the other hand, Cisco Tetration is most compared with VMware NSX, Guardicore Centra, Illumio Adaptive Security Platform, vRealize Network Insight and Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, whereas Fortinet FortiCWP is most compared with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks.

See our list of best Cloud Workload Security vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Workload Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.