We performed a comparison between Cisco Secure Workload and McAfee MOVE AntiVirus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud and Data Center Security solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is micro-segmentation, which is the most important with respect to visibility."
"Generally speaking, Cisco support is considered one of the best in the networking products and stack."
"Scalability is its most valuable feature."
"The product offers great visibility into the network so we can enforce security measures."
"Instead of proving that all the access control lists are in place and all the EPGs are correct, we can just point the auditor to a dashboard and point out that there aren't any escaped conversations. It saves an enormous, enormous amount of time."
"It's stable."
"The product provides multiple-device integration."
"Secure Workload's best feature is that it's an end-to-end offering from Cisco."
"There have never been any issues in terms of security, so it's assumed that McAfee is doing its job well."
"I have found McAfee MOVE AntiVirus more secure than other antivirus solutions."
"The most valuable feature is the security, which is very effective compared to other products."
"The solution is scalable."
"The protection on offer is very fast."
"The solution can scale."
"I use McAfee MOVE AntiVirus for internet security, file security, and ensuring I don't have viruses on my system."
"The solution is very stable and reliable."
"It is highly scalable, but there is a limitation that it is only available on Cisco devices."
"The interface is really helpful for technical people, but it is not user-friendly."
"I'd like to see better documentation for advanced features. The documentation is fairly basic. I would also like to see better integration with other applications."
"Secure Workload is a little complicated to use, and the dashboard isn't intuitive, so it takes a while to learn how to use it."
"The emailed notifications are either hard to find or they are not available. Search capabilities can be improved."
"The multi-tenancy, redundancy, backup and restore functionalities, as well as the monitoring aspects of the solution, need improvement. The solution offers virtually no enterprise-grade possibility for monitoring."
"The integration could be better, especially with different types of solutions."
"It has an uninviting interface."
"The solution could be more secure."
"The solution could be a bit less expensive."
"McAfee could improve the administrative interface. It's functional but could be more user-friendly."
"Lacks cloud security integrated with the antivirus."
"The solution must provide better pricing."
"McAfee MOVE AntiVirus blocks ports and applications that we need to use."
"McAfee MOVE AntiVirus could improve by making it more secure."
"There is room for improvement in terms of stability."
Cisco Secure Workload is ranked 9th in Cloud and Data Center Security with 13 reviews while McAfee MOVE AntiVirus is ranked 13th in Anti-Malware Tools with 79 reviews. Cisco Secure Workload is rated 8.4, while McAfee MOVE AntiVirus is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Cisco Secure Workload writes "A solution that provides good technical support but its high cost makes it challenging for users to adopt it". On the other hand, the top reviewer of McAfee MOVE AntiVirus writes "Fast, transparent protection with an easy set up". Cisco Secure Workload is most compared with Illumio, Akamai Guardicore Segmentation, VMware NSX, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks and Cisco ACI, whereas McAfee MOVE AntiVirus is most compared with Trend Micro Deep Security, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Quick Heal Total Security, CrowdStrike Falcon and VMware NSX. See our Cisco Secure Workload vs. McAfee MOVE AntiVirus report.
We monitor all Cloud and Data Center Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
