Compare Cisco Tetration vs. Symantec Storage Protection

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Symantec Storage Protection? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Check Point, Cisco and others in Cloud Workload Security. Updated: October 2020.
441,850 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"By using Tetration insight, we are able to get the latency on our level accounts and we can determine whatever the issue is with the application latency itself.""Scalability is its most valuable feature.""Instead of proving that all the access control lists are in place and all the EPGs are correct, we can just point the auditor to a dashboard and point out that there aren't any escaped conversations. It saves an enormous, enormous amount of time.""A complete and powerful micro-segmentation solution.""The most valuable feature of the solution is that we don't have to do packet captures on the network.""The product offers great visibility into the network so we can enforce security measures.""The most valuable feature of this solution is security.""The solution offers 100% telemetry coverage. The telemetry you collect is not sampled, it's not intermittent. It's complete. You see everything in it, including full visibility of all activities on your endpoints and in your network."

More Cisco Tetration Pros »

"The most valuable features of this solution are the advanced firewall and malware prevention."

More Symantec Storage Protection Pros »

Cons
"It is highly scalable, but there is a limitation that it is only available on Cisco devices.""It is not so easy to use and configure. It needs a bunch of further resources to work, which is mainly the biggest downside of it. The deployment is huge.""They should scale down the hardware a bit. The initial hardware investment is two million dollars so it's a price point problem. The issue with the price comes from the fact that you have to have it with enormous storage and enormous computes.""It has an uninviting interface.""I'd like to see better documentation for advanced features. The documentation is fairly basic. I would also like to see better integration with other applications.""The emailed notifications are either hard to find or they are not available. Search capabilities can be improved.""The interface is really helpful for technical people, but it is not user-friendly.""The multi-tenancy, redundancy, backup and restore functionalities, as well as the monitoring aspects of the solution, need improvement. The solution offers virtually no enterprise-grade possibility for monitoring."

More Cisco Tetration Cons »

"One of the areas that this solution can be improved is in Behavioural monitoring."

More Symantec Storage Protection Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The pricing is a bit higher than we anticipated.""The price is outrageous. If you have money to throw at the product, then do it.""Pricing depends on the scope of the application and the features. Larger installations save more.""It is not cheap and pricing may limit scalability.""The price is based on how many computers you're going to install it on."

More Cisco Tetration Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Workload Security solutions are best for your needs.
441,850 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The most valuable feature is micro-segmentation, which is the most important with respect to visibility.
Top Answer: The price is based on how many installation of software sensors you're going to install it on.
Top Answer: There is some overlap between Cisco Tetration and AppDynamics and there are few DC tools, It would be great to have a single pane of glass, rather than have to jump between different tools.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
3rd
Views
9,228
Comparisons
5,426
Reviews
8
Average Words per Review
462
Avg. Rating
8.6
11th
Views
422
Comparisons
332
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
194
Avg. Rating
8.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 30% of the time.
Compared 24% of the time.
Compared 35% of the time.
Also Known As
Symantec Cloud Workload Protection for Storage
Learn
Cisco
Broadcom
Overview

Cisco Tetration offers holistic workload protection for multicloud data centers by enabling a zero-trust model using segmentation. This approach allows you to identify security incidents faster, contain lateral movement and reduce your attack surface. Its infrastructure-agnostic approach supports both on-premises and public cloud workloads.

Symantec Cloud Workload Protection for Storage helps to protect AWS S3 buckets, enabling secure adoption of containers and serverless technologies such as AWS Lambda. Symantec’s suite of anti-malware technologies, including advanced machine learning and reputation analysis, help to discover and remediate known and unknown threats to keep cloud storage clean. Automatic, scheduled, and on-demand scanning modes enable full-time protection to inspect files as they are uploaded, downloaded, or modified. S3 bucket security posture, alerts, and events are viewed in the single CWP console.

Offer
Learn more about Cisco Tetration
Learn more about Symantec Storage Protection
Sample Customers
ADP, University of North Carolina Charlotte (UNCC)
Information Not Available
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider37%
Computer Software Company27%
Insurance Company4%
Retailer3%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business22%
Large Enterprise78%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business2%
Midsize Enterprise12%
Large Enterprise87%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Check Point, Cisco and others in Cloud Workload Security. Updated: October 2020.
441,850 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Cisco Tetration is ranked 3rd in Cloud Workload Security with 9 reviews while Symantec Storage Protection is ranked 11th in Cloud Workload Security with 1 review. Cisco Tetration is rated 8.6, while Symantec Storage Protection is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Cisco Tetration writes "Saves time, resists attacks, and allocates resources properly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Symantec Storage Protection writes "Good technical support, secures our services and mobile devices against malware". Cisco Tetration is most compared with VMware NSX, Guardicore Centra, Illumio Adaptive Security Platform, vRealize Network Insight and Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, whereas Symantec Storage Protection is most compared with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks and Dome9.

See our list of best Cloud Workload Security vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Workload Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.