We performed a comparison between Cisco UCS B-Series and Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers."The most valuable feature is the ability to replace a server with another one, simply by applying the profile"
"The solution is very reliable in comparison to the other brands."
"The GUI makes is simple to use and deploy."
"The platform has valuable features for management and good monitoring tools. It provides efficient insights."
"The product is easy to use."
"The most valuable features of the Cisco UCS B-Series are reports for virtualization and the large memory it has."
"The Boot from SAN function is good because using OTV, we can boot the device from any remote location."
"The solution is stable."
"Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series has two processors."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its stability."
"Integration with storage could be improved."
"We have to have Java to manage the infrastructure. It would be great if we can manage the infrastructure through a web browser."
"The solution is expensive."
"The high price of the solution is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The main issue with this solution is that it is quite vendor-restricted, meaning that when we use third party software, we cannot use all of the available configuration tools or pre-validated design features."
"HTML5 interface is a much needed improvement over the old Java interface, but still needs a little work."
"Right now, the market is rapidly transitioning to solid-state media and the Cisco options tend to be less varied and more expensive than a broader slate of products from HP, Dell or IBM."
"The configuration is a bit complex, as it requires very high technical expertise to apply it."
"It can have more automation. In addition, Fujitsu should have a broader portfolio, not specifically in terms of the service solutions, but more in terms of the big picture. A broader portfolio would be nice for providing different solutions for the customers."
"The initial setup of Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series was complex."
More Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cisco UCS B-Series is ranked 3rd in Blade Servers with 64 reviews while Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series is ranked 13th in Blade Servers with 3 reviews. Cisco UCS B-Series is rated 8.6, while Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Cisco UCS B-Series writes "Robust hardware and efficient management of hardware, creating group policies, such as scrub policies and maintenance policies". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series writes "A highly stable solution with technical support that is not only good but also always available to help the product's users". Cisco UCS B-Series is most compared with HPE Synergy, Dell PowerEdge M, HPE BladeSystem, Super Micro SuperBlade and Pure Storage FlashBlade, whereas Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series is most compared with Fujitsu CX1000, Super Micro SuperBlade and HPE Synergy.
See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.
We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
