Compare Cisco UCS B-Series vs. Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell EMC and others in Blade Servers. Updated: May 2021.
511,607 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The Dashboard is quite impressive and is, so far, the best based on my experience.""The most valuable feature is the service profile.""Great security and functionality.""The ratio in terms of the number of units and the number of servers that we can get each chassis is quite good.""The stability provided by the product is its most valuable feature for our organization.""The initial setup is simple, and not very complex.""The GUI makes is simple to use and deploy.""Some of the features I like from this solution are it has a fast configuration, it is not complex, and has high availability."

More Cisco UCS B-Series Pros »

"Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series has two processors."

More Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series Pros »

Cons
"There are patches that cannot be implemented without any downtime or reboot required.""The configuration is a little bit complicated and could be made simpler.""Integration with storage could be improved.""Cisco could improve the user-friendliness for less experienced users.""The management interface needs a lot of improvement. As it is right now, it's a pain to use. It's not user-friendly.""The monitoring features and integration with other products can be improved.""The pricing could be less.""For future improvements, it would be a benefit if the solution could integrate better with products such as Oracle."

More Cisco UCS B-Series Cons »

"It can have more automation. In addition, Fujitsu should have a broader portfolio, not specifically in terms of the service solutions, but more in terms of the big picture. A broader portfolio would be nice for providing different solutions for the customers."

More Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The price of this solution is a little bit higher, but given that this system is Cisco, it feels more secure and dependable.""Cisco products are at the high end in terms of cost, but everything is included with the licensing fees.""The pricing for Cisco is less than for the HP Proliant series.""The pricing for Cisco products is always high.""Pricing with Cisco is very high.""The price of this solution compared to others is fair.""Pricing will be based on your requirements so it is important to plan, engage, and negotiate directly with the Cisco Account Manager."

More Cisco UCS B-Series Pricing and Cost Advice »

"There are special licenses that are connected to the usage. We installed Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series for a high PC solution, and for this reason, some Microsoft licenses and other special licenses were embedded or bundled to the Fujitsu solution."

More Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Blade Servers solutions are best for your needs.
511,607 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: I like that it's very manageable very easy to use and configure. I am not an expert, but the graphic user interface is quite simple very easy to use. It's a complete solution.
Top Answer: I was not involved with the specific pricing agreement, so I don't know. However, I am familiar with some of the aspects. Generally, the cheaper, the better. I believe that this is part of the… more »
Top Answer: We have to have Java to manage the infrastructure. It would be great if we can manage the infrastructure through a web browser. We have Dell EMC, and I would like to connect my product directly to the… more »
Top Answer: Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series has two processors.
Top Answer: There are special licenses that are connected to the usage. We installed Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series for a high PC solution, and for this reason, some Microsoft licenses and other special licenses… more »
Top Answer: It can have more automation. In addition, Fujitsu should have a broader portfolio, not specifically in terms of the service solutions, but more in terms of the big picture. A broader portfolio would… more »
Ranking
2nd
out of 23 in Blade Servers
Views
3,255
Comparisons
2,309
Reviews
10
Average Words per Review
505
Rating
8.4
11th
out of 23 in Blade Servers
Views
90
Comparisons
41
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
342
Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
UCS B-Series, Unified Computing System B-Series
Learn More
Overview
Based on Intel Xeon processor E7 and E5 product families, Cisco UCS B-Series Blade Servers work with virtualized and non-virtualized applications to increase: Performance, Energy efficiency, Flexibility and Administrator productivity.

Managing large computing and storage requirements with limited resources, budgets and space is a challenge. The Fujitsu Server PRIMERGY BX400 helps to solve it. It is a fully-featured blade system built from the ground up as a user-friendly and versatile IT infrastructure. Up to eight server and storage blades are all packed into a surprisingly small enclosure that is as easy to install and manage as it is to use.

Offer
Learn more about Cisco UCS B-Series
Learn more about Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series
Sample Customers
Aegean Motorway, Anilana Hotels and Resorts, Anonymous Banking Group, Artoni Transporti, Bellevue, BH Telecom, Bowling Green State University, Children's Hospital Colorado, City of Biel, Dimension Data, Dualtec Cloud Builders, Hertz, Houston Methodist, Kuwait Petroleum Italia, Lufthansa Systems GmbH & Co.KG, Outscale, Sony Corporation, Talbots
Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Tokyo Stock Exchange, RAF St. Mawgan, King Fahad Medical City, St. Bede’s Catholic High School, 
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm29%
Manufacturing Company18%
University12%
Government12%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider27%
Computer Software Company26%
Government10%
Financial Services Firm7%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business26%
Midsize Enterprise18%
Large Enterprise55%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell EMC and others in Blade Servers. Updated: May 2021.
511,607 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Cisco UCS B-Series is ranked 2nd in Blade Servers with 11 reviews while Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series is ranked 11th in Blade Servers with 1 review. Cisco UCS B-Series is rated 8.4, while Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Cisco UCS B-Series writes "Does what it is supposed to in the way the company represents with little room for improvement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series writes "Stable, easy to set up, and has two processors". Cisco UCS B-Series is most compared with HPE Synergy, HPE BladeSystem, Dell PowerEdge M, Super Micro SuperBlade and Lenovo Flex System, whereas Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series is most compared with HPE Synergy.

See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.

We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.