We performed a comparison between Cisco UCS B-Series and HPE NonStop based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Blade Servers solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Great security and functionality."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to replace a server with another one, simply by applying the profile"
"The feature that I found the most value is the abstract and stateless capacities."
"The ratio in terms of the number of units and the number of servers that we can get each chassis is quite good."
"The initial setup is pretty simple and straightforward."
"Cisco UCS B-Series is scalable."
"It is a very robust and reliable solution."
"The scalability is good because it comes with Fabric Interconnects, and you can directly add more blades as you go. Therefore, scalability is not a problem."
"The stability of HPE NonStop is good."
"We don't have any issues with the stability of HPE NonStop."
"Feature-wise, the most valuable one is the fact that it has 100 hundred percent uptime every year. Secondly, it is stable."
"This model does not support virtualization of the switch."
"For future improvements, it would be a benefit if the solution could integrate better with products such as Oracle."
"HTML5 interface is a much needed improvement over the old Java interface, but still needs a little work."
"The GUI is not the greatest."
"The cost is expensive and has room for improvement."
"The price of the solution could improve."
"There are some shortcomings in the product when you look at it from the perspective of the area involving multiple configurations, making it an aspect where improvements are required."
"The high price of the solution is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"HPE NonStop could improve by having infrastructure management."
"It would be helpful if they brought the price down."
"It is not flexible...Not a lot of applications run on HPE NonStop."
Cisco UCS B-Series is ranked 3rd in Blade Servers with 64 reviews while HPE NonStop is ranked 9th in Blade Servers with 12 reviews. Cisco UCS B-Series is rated 8.6, while HPE NonStop is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Cisco UCS B-Series writes "Robust hardware and efficient management of hardware, creating group policies, such as scrub policies and maintenance policies". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HPE NonStop writes "With a perfect record for uptime, the solution ensures a return on investment". Cisco UCS B-Series is most compared with HPE Synergy, Dell PowerEdge M, HPE BladeSystem, Super Micro SuperBlade and Pure Storage FlashBlade, whereas HPE NonStop is most compared with HPE Superdome X, Dell PowerEdge M and Fujitsu CX1000. See our Cisco UCS B-Series vs. HPE NonStop report.
See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.
We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
