Compare Cisco UCS B-Series vs. Intel MFSYS25

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Cisco UCS B-Series Logo
4,269 views|2,944 comparisons
Intel MFSYS25 Logo
56 views|31 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use Intel MFSYS25? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco UCS B-Series vs. HPE BladeSystem and other solutions. Updated: July 2020.
431,275 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
The price of this solution is a little bit higher, but given that this system is Cisco, it feels more secure and dependable.The type of service level purchase will determine the level of support response that you receive from Cisco.

More Cisco UCS B-Series Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Blade Servers solutions are best for your needs.
431,275 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
3rd
out of 25 in Blade Servers
Views
4,269
Comparisons
2,944
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
434
Avg. Rating
8.3
20th
out of 25 in Blade Servers
Views
56
Comparisons
31
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Compared 57% of the time.
Also Known As
UCS B-Series, Unified Computing System B-SeriesMFSYS25
Learn
Cisco
Intel
Overview
Based on Intel Xeon processor E7 and E5 product families, Cisco UCS B-Series Blade Servers work with virtualized and non-virtualized applications to increase: Performance, Energy efficiency, Flexibility and Administrator productivity.

This Intel Modular Server System MFSYS25/MFSYS35 platform supports up to six compute modules, up to fourteen hot-swap 2.5-inch SAS hard disk drives in the Intel Modular Server System MFSYS25, or up to six hot-swap 3.5-inch SAS/SATA hard disk drives in the Intel Modular Server System MFSYS35, an integrated server management module, redundant Ethernet switches, and redundant storage controllers. The server ships configured for rack mounting, but may be mounted in a pedestal configuration. 

Offer
Learn more about Cisco UCS B-Series
Learn more about Intel MFSYS25
Sample Customers
Aegean Motorway, Anilana Hotels and Resorts, Anonymous Banking Group, Artoni Transporti, Bellevue, BH Telecom, Bowling Green State University, Children's Hospital Colorado, City of Biel, Dimension Data, Dualtec Cloud Builders, Hertz, Houston Methodist, Kuwait Petroleum Italia, Lufthansa Systems GmbH & Co.KG, Outscale, Sony Corporation, TalbotsEisenhower & Carlson, PLLC
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm33%
Manufacturing Company22%
Comms Service Provider11%
Construction Company11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company34%
Comms Service Provider18%
Financial Services Firm9%
Manufacturing Company8%
No Data Available
Cisco UCS B-Series is ranked 3rd in Blade Servers with 2 reviews while Intel MFSYS25 is ranked 20th in Blade Servers. Cisco UCS B-Series is rated 8.6, while Intel MFSYS25 is rated 0. The top reviewer of Cisco UCS B-Series writes "A highly available and flexible solution with a single point of administration". On the other hand, Cisco UCS B-Series is most compared with HPE Synergy, HPE BladeSystem, Dell PowerEdge M, Super Micro SuperBlade and Lenovo Flex System, whereas Intel MFSYS25 is most compared with .

See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.

We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.