Most Helpful Review | |||||
|
| ||||
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco UCS B-Series vs. HPE BladeSystem and other solutions. Updated: November 2019. 382,547 professionals have used our research since 2012. |
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros | |
The Dashboard is quite impressive and is, so far, the best based on my experience. I can connect Cisco UCS B-Series to multiple chassis and rack servers using a unified platform, then manage them on a single console. I like that the hardware is separated from the software definition of the components. | The stability and speed are always good. The processor is good and it's still working with our loads. |
Cons | |
There are patches that cannot be implemented without any downtime or reboot required. The configuration is a bit complex, as it requires very high technical expertise to apply it. It needs a better UI. Cisco makes a great product, but doesn't know how to make a UI. | The user-interface needs improvement, because they have an application from which we have to manage the whole system and all the infrastructure. This application is not working at our premises, because of some problem with the hardware itself. So although we brought it with our systems, and we used it to manage all the systems: the storage, the switches, and everything, nevertheless we have to support every part alone and enter the interface in one-by-one. |
Pricing and Cost Advice | |
The price of this solution is a little bit higher, but given that this system is Cisco, it feels more secure and dependable. The type of service level purchase will determine the level of support response that you receive from Cisco. | We have the whole maintenance for the 3 years, starting the deployment. We also have the VMware license for 3 years and I think we have another license to buy. There are no additional costs besides licensing. |
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Blade Servers solutions are best for your needs. 382,547 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Ranking | |
Views 4,322 Comparisons 2,777 Reviews 3 Average Words per Review 434 Avg. Rating 8.3 | Views 619 Comparisons 414 Reviews 1 Average Words per Review 1,078 Avg. Rating 8.0 |
Top Comparisons | |
Compared 59% of the time. Compared 16% of the time. Compared 8% of the time. | Compared 50% of the time. Compared 24% of the time. Compared 15% of the time. |
Also Known As | |
UCS B-Series, Unified Computing System B-Series | |
Learn | |
Cisco | Lenovo |
Overview | |
Based on Intel Xeon processor E7 and E5 product families, Cisco UCS B-Series Blade Servers work with virtualized and non-virtualized applications to increase: Performance, Energy efficiency, Flexibility and Administrator productivity. | Flex System is Lenovo’s proven, 2nd generation blade, that efficiently runs your infrastructure applications with up to 80% better density than standard rack server deployments. |
Offer | |
Learn more about Cisco UCS B-Series | Learn more about Lenovo Flex System |
Sample Customers | |
Aegean Motorway, Anilana Hotels and Resorts, Anonymous Banking Group, Artoni Transporti, Bellevue, BH Telecom, Bowling Green State University, Children's Hospital Colorado, City of Biel, Dimension Data, Dualtec Cloud Builders, Hertz, Houston Methodist, Kuwait Petroleum Italia, Lufthansa Systems GmbH & Co.KG, Outscale, Sony Corporation, Talbots | Information Not Available |
Top Industries | |
Financial Services Firm33% Manufacturing Company22% Marketing Services Firm11% Construction Company11% Software R&D Company29% Financial Services Firm17% Manufacturing Company8% Comms Service Provider8% | No Data Available |
See also Cisco UCS B-Series Reviews, Lenovo Flex System Reviews, and our list of Best Blade Servers Companies.