Compare Cisco UCS B-Series vs. NEC Sigmablade-H

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use NEC Sigmablade-H? Share your opinion.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
The price of this solution is a little bit higher, but given that this system is Cisco, it feels more secure and dependable.The type of service level purchase will determine the level of support response that you receive from Cisco.

More Cisco UCS B-Series Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Blade Servers solutions are best for your needs.
431,790 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
3rd
out of 25 in Blade Servers
Views
4,269
Comparisons
2,944
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
434
Avg. Rating
8.3
21st
out of 25 in Blade Servers
Views
54
Comparisons
23
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Compared 57% of the time.
Also Known As
UCS B-Series, Unified Computing System B-SeriesSigmablade-H
Learn
Cisco
NEC
Overview
Based on Intel Xeon processor E7 and E5 product families, Cisco UCS B-Series Blade Servers work with virtualized and non-virtualized applications to increase: Performance, Energy efficiency, Flexibility and Administrator productivity.

The NEC N8405-024F Blade Enclosure (SIGMABLADE-H) can integrate a maximum of 16 servers' functions into one blade enclosure by housing a maximum of 16 CPU blades and 8 pass-through cards or switch modules in a case of 10U (about 445mm). 

Offer
Learn more about Cisco UCS B-Series
Learn more about NEC Sigmablade-H
Sample Customers
Aegean Motorway, Anilana Hotels and Resorts, Anonymous Banking Group, Artoni Transporti, Bellevue, BH Telecom, Bowling Green State University, Children's Hospital Colorado, City of Biel, Dimension Data, Dualtec Cloud Builders, Hertz, Houston Methodist, Kuwait Petroleum Italia, Lufthansa Systems GmbH & Co.KG, Outscale, Sony Corporation, TalbotsMiyakonojo City Council
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm33%
Manufacturing Company22%
Comms Service Provider11%
Construction Company11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company34%
Comms Service Provider18%
Financial Services Firm9%
Manufacturing Company8%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco UCS B-Series vs. HPE BladeSystem and other solutions. Updated: July 2020.
431,790 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Cisco UCS B-Series is ranked 3rd in Blade Servers with 2 reviews while NEC Sigmablade-H is ranked 21st in Blade Servers. Cisco UCS B-Series is rated 8.6, while NEC Sigmablade-H is rated 0. The top reviewer of Cisco UCS B-Series writes "A highly available and flexible solution with a single point of administration". On the other hand, Cisco UCS B-Series is most compared with HPE Synergy, HPE BladeSystem, Dell PowerEdge M, Super Micro SuperBlade and Lenovo Flex System, whereas NEC Sigmablade-H is most compared with .

See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.

We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.