• Home
  • Cisco UCS B-Series vs. NEC Sigmablade-H

Cisco UCS B-Series vs NEC Sigmablade-H comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Cisco Logo

Cisco UCS B-Series

Read 64 Cisco UCS B-Series reviews
2,034 views|1,517 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
NEC Logo

NEC Sigmablade-H

55 views|32 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Blade Servers
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cisco UCS B-Series and NEC Sigmablade-H based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers.
To learn more, read our detailed Blade Servers Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
JohnDeavers
Modular, extendable, and high-density
Over the years, it's been it's come a long way from going from UCS manager to intersite managed solution. So we're doing a lot of cloud type... Read more →
Use NEC Sigmablade-H?
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It makes much more sense for individual licenses for distributed environments"
  • "Make sure you work with a vendor partner than can get you a substantial discount off of list pricing."
  • "The type of service level purchase will determine the level of support response that you receive from Cisco."
  • "The price of this solution is a little bit higher, but given that this system is Cisco, it feels more secure and dependable."
  • "Cisco products are at the high end in terms of cost, but everything is included with the licensing fees."
  • "The pricing for Cisco is less than for the HP Proliant series."
  • "The pricing for Cisco products is always high."
  • "Pricing with Cisco is very high."

    • More Cisco UCS B-Series Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Blade Servers solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    What do you like most about Cisco UCS B-Series?
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is easily scalable.
    Read all 36 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco UCS B-Series?
    Top Answer:It is not a yearly subscription but a yearly support renewal that you need to do for Cisco UCS B-Series.
    Read all 27 answers   →
    What needs improvement with Cisco UCS B-Series?
    Top Answer:There are some shortcomings in the product when you look at it from the perspective of the area involving multiple configurations, making it an aspect where improvements are required. The server… more »
    Read all 35 answers   →
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    3rd
    out of 22 in Blade Servers
    Views
    2,034
    Comparisons
    1,517
    Reviews
    19
    Average Words per Review
    422
    Rating
    8.6
    19th
    out of 22 in Blade Servers
    Views
    55
    Comparisons
    32
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    UCS B-Series, Unified Computing System B-Series
    Sigmablade-H
    Learn More
    Cisco
    Video Not Available
    NEC
    Overview
    Based on Intel Xeon processor E7 and E5 product families, Cisco UCS B-Series Blade Servers work with virtualized and non-virtualized applications to increase: Performance, Energy efficiency, Flexibility and Administrator productivity.

    The NEC N8405-024F Blade Enclosure (SIGMABLADE-H) can integrate a maximum of 16 servers' functions into one blade enclosure by housing a maximum of 16 CPU blades and 8 pass-through cards or switch modules in a case of 10U (about 445mm). 

    Sample Customers
    Aegean Motorway, Anilana Hotels and Resorts, Anonymous Banking Group, Artoni Transporti, Bellevue, BH Telecom, Bowling Green State University, Children's Hospital Colorado, City of Biel, Dimension Data, Dualtec Cloud Builders, Hertz, Houston Methodist, Kuwait Petroleum Italia, Lufthansa Systems GmbH & Co.KG, Outscale, Sony Corporation, Talbots
    Miyakonojo City Council
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm23%
    Manufacturing Company17%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    Computer Software Company13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company21%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Government9%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise58%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise68%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Blade Servers
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Cisco UCS B-Series is ranked 3rd in Blade Servers with 64 reviews while NEC Sigmablade-H is ranked 19th in Blade Servers. Cisco UCS B-Series is rated 8.6, while NEC Sigmablade-H is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Cisco UCS B-Series writes "Robust hardware and efficient management of hardware, creating group policies, such as scrub policies and maintenance policies". On the other hand, Cisco UCS B-Series is most compared with HPE Synergy, Dell PowerEdge M, HPE BladeSystem, Super Micro SuperBlade and Pure Storage FlashBlade, whereas NEC Sigmablade-H is most compared with .

    See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.

    We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.