We performed a comparison between Cisco UCS B-Series and PowerEdge C based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Blade Servers solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Cisco UCS B-Series is scalable."
"The hardware is easily swappable and, utilizing the boot from SAN option, you can always keep your server intact due to the service profiles."
"The Dashboard is quite impressive and is, so far, the best based on my experience."
"The stability provided by the product is its most valuable feature for our organization."
"I like that it's very manageable very easy to use and configure. I am not an expert, but the graphic user interface is quite simple very easy to use. It's a complete solution."
"Stateless Blade is the best feature."
"The most valuable feature is the service profile."
"The solution's most valuable feature is KVM Launch Manager."
"The performance is good."
"Every new version is better than the previous one."
"The hybrid solution is much more stable than other products."
"One of the main features that attract customers to buy their products is the great management tool and almost zero failure rate, making it easy to use."
"The scalability of the product is good since it offers high performance and capacity."
"I like the feature that allows for a backup and that is suitable for me."
"The product has high performance and no downtime."
"The product's initial setup phase was easy."
"The management interface needs a lot of improvement. As it is right now, it's a pain to use. It's not user-friendly."
"The price of the solution could improve."
"The monitoring features and integration with other products can be improved."
"It needs a better UI. Cisco makes a great product, but doesn't know how to make a UI."
"We have to have Java to manage the infrastructure. It would be great if we can manage the infrastructure through a web browser."
"Next generation support for VMware needs to be introduced as it does not support eighth-generation VMware."
"The price of this product is too high. They should work to make it more affordable."
"The high price of the solution is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The price must be improved."
"We had a few minor issues with compatibility on the latest version during the installation process."
"There could be some more ports added in the future."
"The VxRail should be opened to allow other virtualization platforms to be used."
"It would be better if the solution provided simplified storage and hardware with an integrated one-tier architecture."
"The product’s cost needs improvement."
"The product’s pricing could be a little cheaper."
"HP is a little bit lower in terms of price."
Cisco UCS B-Series is ranked 3rd in Blade Servers with 64 reviews while PowerEdge C is ranked 5th in Blade Servers with 23 reviews. Cisco UCS B-Series is rated 8.6, while PowerEdge C is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Cisco UCS B-Series writes "Robust hardware and efficient management of hardware, creating group policies, such as scrub policies and maintenance policies". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PowerEdge C writes "Easy to deploy and has high performance and no downtime". Cisco UCS B-Series is most compared with HPE Synergy, Dell PowerEdge M, HPE BladeSystem and Super Micro SuperBlade, whereas PowerEdge C is most compared with Huawei FusionServer X Series, HPE Apollo and Dell PowerEdge M. See our Cisco UCS B-Series vs. PowerEdge C report.
See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.
We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
