Compare Cisco UCS Director vs. CloudHealth

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Cisco UCS Director Logo
2,050 views|1,583 comparisons
CloudHealth Logo
4,471 views|3,594 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use CloudHealth? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco UCS Director vs. CloudHealth and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
457,459 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"UCS director enables us to be more productive and more agile, and also more self-sufficient because we don't have to depend on anybody else.""A product that really aids in systems management without complexity.""This is a user-friendly solution that is very good and easy to use.""The most valuable feature of this solution is the fabric sharing.""I can manage multiple workloads whether it's on AWS, Azure, or on-premises. They can be managed by using the UCS Director."

More Cisco UCS Director Pros »

"This solution is fast and very easy to understand, even if you are not a technician.""We are able to create an internal price of the product that we can then sell to clients. We get the cost plan at a good discount and then resell it with a mark up to our enterprise-level clients. This flexibility in pricing is one of the solution's best features."

More CloudHealth Pros »

Cons
"Simplifying the user interface would go a long way to making it more usable.""The product could allow more programmatic opportunities through better development of the API.""I would like to see more integration with other solutions.""We cannot depend on this solution to manage all of the data center's infrastructure.""Normally, UCS Director is used primarily for orchestration, but when we look at a non-Cisco data infrastructure components, the UCS Director needs a bit more improvement in terms of integration with third-party systems and with existing older systems."

More Cisco UCS Director Cons »

"If you are working with the OS you need help and other connectors to get more information.""The solution doesn't offer the best functionality, unfortunately. Some features just simply aren't on offer. The solution needs to offer more product milestones."

More CloudHealth Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The cost of this solution is significant."

More Cisco UCS Director Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The licensing fees depend on how big the company is. If you are a larger company then you have a better contract with a better price. The price is different for a small company."

More CloudHealth Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.
457,459 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: I can manage multiple workloads whether it's on AWS, Azure, or on-premises. They can be managed by using the UCS Director.
Top Answer: I would like to see more flexibility when it comes to managing other stacks, like VMware virtualization.
Top Answer: The typical use case is for web services. It is integrated with our database.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
6th
out of 71 in Cloud Management
Views
2,050
Comparisons
1,583
Reviews
6
Average Words per Review
534
Rating
7.5
5th
out of 71 in Cloud Management
Views
4,471
Comparisons
3,594
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
894
Rating
10.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 21% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Learn
Cisco
VMware
Overview

Cisco UCS Director enables automated delivery of physical and virtual data center resources, empowering data centers to move at the speed of business.

CloudHealth Technologies' cloud management platform aggregates, correlates, and analyzes data from disparate cloud data sets so that enterprises and service providers can align cloud operations with business objectives, reduce costs and ensure service levels are being met, based on an optimally performing cloud environment.

Offer
Learn more about Cisco UCS Director
Learn more about CloudHealth
Sample Customers
Entel, Data#3, Cegal, NESIC, LightEdgePinterest, Dow Jones, RhythmOne, Ziff Davis, Acquia, Mentor Graphics, Lookout, Veracode, SwiftKey, Amtrak, Shi, Imgur, SumoLogic, NewsUK, Cloudera, Canvas
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider52%
Computer Software Company18%
Media Company4%
Wholesaler/Distributor3%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company39%
Comms Service Provider16%
Media Company7%
Retailer7%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business14%
Midsize Enterprise14%
Large Enterprise71%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco UCS Director vs. CloudHealth and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
457,459 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Cisco UCS Director is ranked 6th in Cloud Management with 6 reviews while CloudHealth is ranked 5th in Cloud Management with 2 reviews. Cisco UCS Director is rated 7.6, while CloudHealth is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Cisco UCS Director writes "Brings agility to our organization, allowing for better manageability and faster deployment". On the other hand, the top reviewer of CloudHealth writes "Complete solution for managing operations, easy to use with a great dashboard, good technical support". Cisco UCS Director is most compared with Cisco Intersight, VMware vRealize Automation (vRA), Cisco CloudCenter, VMware vRealize Operations (vROps) and vCloud Director, whereas CloudHealth is most compared with Cloudability, CloudCheckr Cloud Management Platform, Turbonomic, VMware vRealize Automation (vRA) and VMware vRealize Operations (vROps). See our Cisco UCS Director vs. CloudHealth report.

See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.