Cisco UCS Director vs CloudM Manage comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cisco UCS Director and CloudM Manage based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, Nutanix, IBM and others in Cloud Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Management Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"A product that really aids in systems management without complexity.""Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.""The solution is helpful for centralized management.""The product is flexible and compact. It has a lot of features.""The reason we went with Cisco is that it comes at a very negligible cost as part of the BOQ. Compared to the competition's products, which are incredibly expensive, UCS Director is low-cost.""UCS director enables us to be more productive and more agile, and also more self-sufficient because we don't have to depend on anybody else.""I can manage multiple workloads whether it's on AWS, Azure, or on-premises. They can be managed by using the UCS Director.""This is a user-friendly solution that is very good and easy to use."

More Cisco UCS Director Pros →

"CloudM has good stability and scalability."

More CloudM Manage Pros →

Cons
"Currently, Cisco UCS Director is unable to integrate with another product or with a server from another brand.""We cannot depend on this solution to manage all of the data center's infrastructure.""I would like to see more integration with other solutions.""It is not easy to add or expand the product.""The tool should be a lot more intuitive and make it easy for us to understand and migrate.""The product's pricing needs to improve.""There could be an improvement with the integration with the newest solutions from other vendors' technologies.""Simplifying the user interface would go a long way to making it more usable."

More Cisco UCS Director Cons →

"CloudM is slow compared to other solutions."

More CloudM Manage Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The cost of this solution is significant."
  • "Cisco UCS Director is expensive...I rate the solution's pricing a three out of ten."
  • "I would rate the product's pricing an eight out of ten."
  • "On a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price and ten is a high price, I rate the pricing around five to six out of ten."
  • "The budget doesn’t work for the state and local governments."
  • "I rate Cisco UCS Director's price a three out of ten. Cisco UCS Director is not an affordable product. With Cisco UCS Director, there is a need to pay an overall price, which consists of the product, software, and support."
  • More Cisco UCS Director Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.
    Top Answer:I rate Cisco UCS Director's price a three out of ten. Cisco UCS Director is not an affordable product. With Cisco UCS Director, there is a need to pay an overall price, which consists of the product… more »
    Top Answer:Currently, Cisco UCS Director is unable to integrate with another product or with a server from another brand. If Cisco UCS Director is able to integrate with another product or with a server from… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    24th
    out of 75 in Cloud Management
    Views
    946
    Comparisons
    744
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    404
    Rating
    6.4
    70th
    out of 75 in Cloud Management
    Views
    55
    Comparisons
    33
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    CloudM CloudManager
    Learn More
    Overview

    Cisco UCS Director enables automated delivery of physical and virtual data center resources, empowering data centers to move at the speed of business.

    At CloudM we are on a mission to create the world’s leading migration and management platform that enables organizations of all sizes to get more out of the cloud. More productive people, more for your money and a more secure future.

    Sample Customers
    Entel, Data#3, Cegal, NESIC, LightEdge
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm25%
    Energy/Utilities Company25%
    Retailer13%
    Government13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company30%
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Government11%
    Healthcare Company9%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise64%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise68%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Cloud Management
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, Nutanix, IBM and others in Cloud Management. Updated: March 2024.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Cisco UCS Director is ranked 24th in Cloud Management with 13 reviews while CloudM Manage is ranked 70th in Cloud Management. Cisco UCS Director is rated 7.2, while CloudM Manage is rated 3.0. The top reviewer of Cisco UCS Director writes "A compact and flexible solution with a lot of features ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of CloudM Manage writes "Performance is relatively poor and speed needs improvement". Cisco UCS Director is most compared with Cisco Intersight, vCenter Orchestrator, VMware Aria Automation, VMware Aria Operations and vCloud Director, whereas CloudM Manage is most compared with .

    See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

    We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.